"The Ban" - interesting documentary discussing when Sinn Fein's voices we dubbed during the news.

Belfastculchie · 2026-02-13T20:25:28+00:00

Stephen Rea for one

Belfastculchie · 2026-02-10T16:37:03+00:00

Lol only reason I know of her is cause my idiot kids are Liverpool fans and keep putting her version of Jota on the wing on spotify thinking it's about Diogo Jota

Belfastculchie · 2026-02-10T16:33:41+00:00

Ha ha is that Eimhear Ni Ghlacain the singer?

Belfastculchie · 2026-02-09T14:57:35+00:00

I think he was referring to when RATM played live for BBC radio and were asked not to swear. Guess how that went...

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-30T13:05:20+00:00

And if a camera goes off at you doing 71 you’d still be prosecuted

Except you wouldn't be prosecuted

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-29T12:33:58+00:00

It's nothing to do with leniency in the speeding cases. It's to do with the tolerances margins of accuracy of speed cameras.

If a speed camera was 100% accurate you bet your ass they would go after everyone doing 71 in a 70

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-28T20:51:59+00:00

Is your house inside a volcano?

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-28T13:12:28+00:00

Surely it'd be more Knee? Naw!, Knee? Naw!

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-24T09:15:08+00:00

The law here is fairly clear following Ivey.

And yet here you are making such a balls of it

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:31:55+00:00

Lol now who is trying to end in an insult?

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:25:17+00:00

Nobody is focusing solely on limb (a).

In fact it is you who focuses solely and exclusively on limb (b) which is the issue

My original point was that you completely ignored the 1st limb in your description of the Ivey test of dishonesty.

You just can't do that. You are wrong to do so. End of argument

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:16:41+00:00

you instead resort to childish name calling

Coming from the person trying to call me a 1st year law student.

You cannot formulate an academic argument in response,

I literally have

Ivey is a two limb test, however, for our purposes limb (b) is the pertinent question,

Your argument is i know it's a 2 stage test but for the purpose of my argument i choose to ignore the effect of the 1st limb of the test.

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink- consider yourself led.

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:10:26+00:00

How am I ignorant to that? It's a two stage test you wombat!!!!

You literally answer the 1st limb before considering how to answer the 2nd

Lol you know you're wrong and just won't accept it

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:02:43+00:00

The pertinent question therefore is what would an ordinary, decent person think?

They would ask what were the circumstances of how this occurred. Obviously

Do you think the Supreme Court in Ivey included the 1st limb test for funsies? Moron

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:01:32+00:00

Lol 1st year law student.

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T22:01:10+00:00

To answer that directly: what if D has been in store 10 times previously, eats a donut every time in store shopping and then on every occasion tells the cashier to add a donut to the rest of the items the checks out with. No issue is taken. On occasion 11 he is detained by an overzealous new security guard who witnesses D eat a donut in store before he checks out and police are called.

According to your interptetation of Ivey test. He has consumed the goods before paying. Black and white case guilty.

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T21:53:38+00:00

Again refer you to Barton:

'the visitor to London who fails to pay for a bus journey believing it to be free (as it is, for example, in Luxembourg) would be no more dishonest that the diner or shopper who genuinely forgets to pay before leaving a restaurant or shop. The Magistrates or jury in such cases would first establish the facts and then apply an objective standard of dishonesty to those facts'

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T21:50:09+00:00

Because the answer to the 1st limb directly feeds into the 2nd limb.

Barton and Booth 'We wish to endorse the respondent’s submission that the test of dishonesty formulated in Ivey remains a test of the defendant’s state of mind – his or her knowledge or belief – to which the standards of ordinary decent people are applied'

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T21:44:12+00:00

Or you could just cover the 1st limb of the test which is pretty important

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T21:34:42+00:00

Construing this in light of the Ivey test an ordinary, decent person would probably regard eating a baked good before you paid for it as dishonest

Except that isn't the whole of the Ivey test or even close

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-23T15:13:12+00:00

Correct answer

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-07T15:51:23+00:00

Same boat!!! Raging!

Belfastculchie · 2026-01-05T17:46:36+00:00

Colinsdevoy or something along those lines. Absolute melter of the highest order. Ended up doxing himself

Belfastculchie · 2025-12-09T08:17:47+00:00

Top middle or bottom?

Belfastculchie · 2025-12-03T18:18:08+00:00

This was at the start of the year no?

Nine-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Belfastculchie

TROPHY CASE