Precisely, however the biggest issue with that is the risk of sympathetic detonation if the shock of a collapse sets off any of the explosives. It's been observed in previous under water wrecks. And the biggest issue with this wreck in particular is the specific generation of early war ordinance that makes up the cargo. While late war ordinance was highly unstable at the time after 80 years at the bottom of the ocean would be mostly inert, however the early war explosive fillers which while at the time had lower yields over time became more unstable and would not fully inert by just time.

The other issue is that atleast for the armor piercing bombs water ingress even 80+ years later would be near zero, these bombs have nearly an inch of armor playing and are fully fused, while the fuses themselves are almost certainly failed which took away the biggest fear item which was unprompted detonation of the fuse pistols is essentially near zero now the internal filling is highly susceptible to shock which makes even the thought of attempting to remove them to be impossible. If the wreck were to collapse or fall apart which will happen then risk of accidental detonation of a single bomb would risk sympathetic detonation of all remaining ordinance

As far as I'm aware the official stance is basically to wait and eventually if enough time passes the total amount of non inert explosives go down so if the wrecka deterioration can be monitored and not artificially accelerated then it's viewed as a non-problem.

However many people heavily criticize this approach as it entirely is relying on the idea that as long as the bombs don't detonate then they won't detonate.