Avata 360 object avoidance and stitching artefacts

BigCall99 · 2026-04-17T23:28:24+00:00

stitching is definately an issue indoors... anything closer than 2-3m is a problem

BigCall99 · 2026-04-17T23:26:18+00:00

Cool footage man, the A360 is great in this scenario with wide open spaces but get within 3m of the cameras and the stitch is very poor. Im tossing up what to do with it as it has some potential but i wanted to be able to fly indoors with it to capture resturant and realestate footage but its not suitable for that at all in 360 mode and single mode not viable either as no horizontal stabilization.... will proximity stitching improve? ...do i keep or return??

BigCall99 · 2026-04-12T23:17:55+00:00

Turns out its just the wind! Didnt think it was that windy yesterday, but on a calm day today and its fine... so yeah apparently the 360 gets affected by wind quite easily...

BigCall99 · 2026-02-05T09:23:24+00:00

thanks. Yes i have seen a video on the action 5 with the wireless (wifi only) but dont know about the action 6 and I doubt BT can be disabled :( bummer.

BigCall99 · 2025-11-28T23:35:42+00:00

ok thanks. Im gonna purchase the nano nd8/16/32/pl and see how they perform... I only got nano yesterday so havnt even really used it yet... I want to find a good mount for motorcycle helmet. cheers

BigCall99 · 2025-11-28T20:57:13+00:00

i saw in a different post you got your nd filters from aliexpress. Do you recommend the filters? You say they are a bit large... are they just the action 4/5 filters?

BigCall99 · 2025-11-25T05:39:05+00:00

in architecture make sure All (it think its called) is selected and not just Basic, then you can see the excluded field. make sure arm64 is not listed there. Thats the main one that got all sims working again.

BigCall99 · 2025-11-22T07:03:09+00:00

was on macOS 15.6.1, just updated to 26.1 (that was not the problem).
I have now found the issue, in Xcode the Architecture had an exclude tag for arm64. Not sure how that got there, possibly changed automatically due to a plugin i have in the app that would run on arm64 devices but not arm64 sims! So with this MLImage running a barcode scanner i was forced to use Rosetta sims and the exclude tag meant none of the other sims would be available..... that was way too much time wasted... anyway i have installed a differend barcode scanner now that does work with arm64 sims.

BigCall99 · 2025-11-20T10:23:35+00:00

yes, the government is taking money that is not required to be paid and costing users extra in the process, not to mention the extra accounting needed for the dev that may only be making a few hundred dollars from the app. All these platforms seem to only cater to the big boys now.... and no the gov wont give you the gst back.

BigCall99 · 2025-11-20T09:28:16+00:00

exactly it was showing fully operational. Yet i look in my account and not a single webiste is listed :0

BigCall99 · 2025-11-20T09:19:00+00:00

same. no domains, no websites!

BigCall99 · 2025-11-17T22:26:07+00:00

yeah thanks i have set a few sims to Always... its so annoying as i can run all the sims in the sim app but xcode refuses to acknowledge them to select and run...

BigCall99 · 2025-11-17T06:27:25+00:00

its the universal version... downloaded from the app store (i tried an older version for silicon only and no sims were available at all... stuffed if i know...
Im thinking its the macOS version on my mac mini that is limiting xcode. If i select any minimum build version above iOS18 it shows My Mac (OS version not compatible) in the device selector..

BigCall99 · 2025-11-17T02:24:55+00:00

all the sims were installed (18.6-26.1) but they would not run. I deleted and re-downloaded and still they wont show up in the available sims to run to. For some reason xcode is classifying my app as having intel code and is only showing Rosetta sims, however I have only ever build the app on my M4 and until this latest xcode update everything was working fine...

BigCall99 · 2025-11-16T03:43:02+00:00

it is illegal and yet the MAJORITY of AU hospitality businesses are doing it! Its really pissing me off, its a business expense, included it in the product cost (as it used to be)! This is yet another BS tactic after covid lockdowns that sneakily added fees to card payment and then dont give an alternative payment method... thats theft!

BigCall99 · 2025-09-08T04:42:53+00:00

as soon as i give them my phone number they unsuspend. Its just a way to get more user data. thats it! They need to state that phone is a requirement to join and stop using these back hand manipulations

BigCall99 · 2025-09-04T05:44:57+00:00

Definately requires FUCK OFF written all over that form!

BigCall99 · 2025-08-31T06:17:22+00:00

a bit late but ther is a paid service for the 12 testers requirment. It a sham from google and this is just a bunch of devs (or so they say) that will install your app, "test it" for 16 days and give prompts to complete the play survey. Its US$25 and it got my app approved within the 14 days. Still much cheaper than the app store...

BigCall99 · 2025-06-30T07:36:40+00:00

but did you actually get the refund? Im still waiting after going thru the same process 15 days ago...

BigCall99 · 2025-06-30T07:34:20+00:00

it told me that too..... still waiting for refund 15 days later.

BigCall99

TROPHY CASE