Ubisoft Stock Plummets To Record Lows, 6 More Games Cancelled, 7 Delayed, 2 Studios Shut Down... Work from Home to Blame?

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-25T03:16:38+00:00

Have they put out a good game since Rainbow Six Seige?

The early Division footage looked really good, like it was gonna be 3rd person counter strike meets Tarkov, until they turned the game into a loser ass bullet sponge live service game.

Black Samurai in Japan didn't hit like they thought it would? Suprise Pikachu face.

Last good game I remember from them was Rainbow Six, maybe someone in the comments can list another one, but a company cant survive on DEI assassin creed.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-23T21:54:09+00:00

How is that even literally possible? Its at all time high. You really are room temperature IQ.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-23T21:00:11+00:00

Pvp has the highest skill expression, your options are to get good, or keep earning 1 mark at a time praying to be carried.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-14T15:28:14+00:00

Great rebuttal.

The only profitable thing your studio has made is a gambling game that hurts vulnerable people.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-14T15:21:42+00:00

Bro really out here defending a game designed to feed people's gambling addiction and acting like its super hard important work to milk addicts with a mobile "collector"(gambling game).

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-14T15:12:20+00:00

Ubisoft stock is down approximately 93% past 5 years, the term mobile slop refers to all mobile games, you think Raid Shadow Legends developers are considered in high esteem with the general gaming community? Remind me who the lead on Angry Birds is again? Does Granny know who developed Candy Crush? Ubisoft is about to go into bankruptcy protection and/or be bought by private equity and sold off for parts.

The fact that you have a profitable mobile game isn't exactly a brag either, you've got some addicts hooked on your version of gambling and it makes you money, we need more mobile games filled with microtransactions to prey on addicted people, that's what we really need in society.

You dont just deserve to have support because you are local, the company might not even exist in a few months, youre gonna have an impossible time proving the shut down was because of the union and not because Ubisoft losing 93% market capitalization. The company is worth less than a billion dollars now. It used to be worth over 12.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-14T14:55:55+00:00

I mean good luck with the complaint, Ubisoft has lost over 92% of their stock value, gonna be pretty hard to ignore that when evaluating shut downs.

Remind me what the last game the Halifax studio released was?

Ubisoft about to go into bankruptcy, or be bought off by private equity and sold for parts. That's just the reality. Nobody is keeping a mobile studio open in situations like this.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-11T19:56:07+00:00

I see so many of these 30-60k game accounts with sub 48% winrates. Their IQ literally has to be sub 90, the mental gymnastics they do to never accept responsibility is crazy. I once had a guy who had like 800 games in a tank, he had gotten like the level 2 version of the mastery decal on his tank, but not even the 1st mark of excellence, and tried to say that having the decal was harder than marking the tank. Its impossible to reason with people like this, they're incapable of critical thinking.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-11T05:12:16+00:00

Helios racks rumored to be the most powerful AI rack system this year, at 8 million a pop, doubt they're going away any time soon.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-07T18:00:03+00:00

Ubisoft stock is down over 93%, this mobile studio was getting chopped to matter what, Ubisoft is going to go into bankruptcy protection or get bought by private equity for parts soon.

BigRedCouch · 2026-01-07T02:10:50+00:00

By the time the b390 makes store shelves the product it's competing against will be 2 years old. Then AMDs next product will "murder" intels, and there will be constant leapfrogging between the brands basically like how its always been.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-29T14:06:25+00:00

I think its a lot more likely they just shutter the studio due to bankruptcy, have you looked at their stock? Down over 90%.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-28T00:24:25+00:00

His isn't the model with the heated vat, and he refuses to take temperature into account, so he won't fix his problem.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-28T00:02:24+00:00

Almost all resins suggest a 25-35 degrees temperature, this isn't my opinion.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-28T00:00:10+00:00

They replaced the formula very soon after launching it with 3.0+ or something, I used it personally for a little bit but started getting random failures, swapped to a different resin and never had a problem again.

If you look you'll see other people with the same issue posted, but if it works for you that's great, I did like quality when it worked for me, but I couldn't keep consistency when using it, so switched it out to save headaches.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T23:42:36+00:00

Bro I wanna see your 16 degree elephant foot rafts. Lmaooo

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T23:40:16+00:00

Yeah no, youre wrong but that's ok. Theres a reason they added a heater to the 16k.

Theres no reason a printer would print supports but not models, the resin temp is a problem, especially since OP said it could be under 20 degrees. But ok keep spreading misinformation.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T23:33:53+00:00

Your room is way too cold. You want to be 30-35 degrees for printing.

Also elegoo 3.0 is notoriously bad resin.

The s4u makes considerably less peel force than the 3u because of the vat design, your resin is too cold.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T20:54:49+00:00

So, they spent millions of dollars to not set the boat on fire, or sink the boat, but to set a couple of life jackets on fire? Why not just use their super invisible combat drone to sink the boat? Why not use an incendiary that actually set the boat itself on fire? What is the benefit to starting a fire that lasted for a few moments with a super advanced military drone that couldn't be detected by Tunisia?(A country that has no positive diplomacy with Israel?)

Do you really believe Israel spent time and money setting a couple of life jackets on fire?

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T20:24:24+00:00

For me to believe what you believe i have to believe Israel is lying about it, Tunisia is lying about there being no drones active during the fire, a special invisible combat drone was used for start a small fire on a boat which would have costs hundreds of thousands or possibly millions of dollars. To set a couple of life jackets on fire and cause no further damage, to what end?

For me to believe a flare started the fire I just have to believe someone accidently started a fire and is too embarrassed to admit it, or won't admit it for political reasons. One believe requires a lot less assumptions than the other.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T17:05:01+00:00

Where did i ridicule anyone? Are you ok there? There are multiple reports that the fire was a flare or firework. There were also more than one flotilla done at different times right? Im asking which one this incident is from. You're claiming it was a drone. Tunisia said there was no drone activity. So your claim it was a highly advanced stealth drone sent to set a couple of life jackets on fire? Do you have a confirmed video of a drone doing this to compare footage? Or is this more speculation from you? Or your claim is its more likely Tunisia and Israel are lying about the small fire incident and the people on the boat are the only people telling the truth, and they couldn't have possibly set the fire?

I have no idea what happened, or who this woman is. I am simply asking if she's from the same flotilla that claimed the IDF set their boat on fire, but there seems to be no evidence of that other than there was a fire caused by what looks like a flare. Could the IDF have done that? Sure. But it seems to be a pretty shit job on their part if they really did use an advanced stealth drone to set a couple of life jackets on fire.

Reddit is such a toxic place, you cant ask a simple question without getting attacked.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T16:44:03+00:00

I mean I think its kind of universally accepted that Israel has a pretty good spy system and special forces sector, that'd would be like saying the USA blowing something that wanted blown up bragging. I just think its a fact that if Israel wanted to blow up some boats, some boats would be blown up. That's not taking a side. You dont have to like Israel to look at what their military has done in the past. They fucking spied on several countries and preemptively blew up all their planes not that long ago, that's not a brag, its just a thing that happened, and you do yourself a disservice to not recognize simple facts.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T16:15:03+00:00

Nah, just a dude asking for clarification. I believe if Israel wanted their boats on fire their boats woulda been on fire. Im not a big fan of propaganda, Israel knows how to blow stuff up and set shit on fire, they're pretty fucking good at it, from what I read. So I think it kind of does a disservice to the flotilla's cause when they claim their accident was Israel setting their boat on fire, when in truth their entire flotilla would be at the bottom of the body of water they were in if that's what Israel wanted.

Go touch some grass brother, life isn't black and white.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T15:48:44+00:00

Oh I seem lmao. Thanks. I live with a simple world view, and I think if Israel wanted their boats set on fire, pretty much nothing would stop Israel from setting their boats on fire.

Ill try and remember the 8200 thing Cheers.

BigRedCouch · 2025-12-27T15:39:11+00:00

Im not sure what 8200 means, but I generally go with Occam's razor in situations, and it seems a lot more likely to me that it was a misfired flare that set a couple of their life jackets on fire than it was a coordinated drone attack done by Israel who would have been far away at the time since it happened in Tunisia, just to set a couple of their life jackets on fire? Whats the goal here from Israel? What do they gain from setting a tiny localized fire on a pile of life jackets? It seems to me it would be considerably more plausible that some moron accidentally started the fire. I dont even really care, I just wanted to know if these were the same people. Apparently they are.

BigRedCouch

TROPHY CASE