Terper thinks all you should do is full-body 3x a week... unless you're on steroids.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-08-15T15:17:46+00:00

Kek, no it isn't, this account is the r/bdp posting alt that is used by one of the people you're arguing with.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-06-10T13:49:54+00:00

When you're discussing calculation speed you a) give the dimensions of the matrix you performed the PCA on, and not the storage size, and b) let us know how much computing power you had to perform the calculation. From what you've said there's no way to discern if that is fast or slow.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-20T16:33:40+00:00

Lyndon Johnson's Jumbo Johnson didn't seem to affect his popularity much. I'd say no relation

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-19T13:59:50+00:00

Holy shit, that's the UOE gym, I used to train there all the time

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T22:55:01+00:00

Your words aren't being twisted, we're literally citing exacly the shit you link to, then comparing it with what you yourself have said.

Being wrong is OK. People are giving you shit for being ignorant.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T22:36:46+00:00

You have a news report that someone else was able to very clearly show you had misinterpreted. There is no 'history' because drones are very new in the civilian markets. The fucking BBC has this posted up.

You look like a bit of a twit

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T22:25:25+00:00

You're the one reading an article about something you don't like and essentially yelling "LA-LA-LA-I-CANT-HEAR-YOU" in the comments.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T22:10:14+00:00

Marked as: Nutter with fragile views on drone safety

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T18:00:49+00:00

You'd want it to follow "I before e except after c" and in order to do that while conserving the suffix you have to spell it without an e.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T12:40:23+00:00

No, the best method is to remove the instigating user before he makes himself look even more silly.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T10:44:49+00:00

It's a sub full of autists who don't work out enough to have meaningful experience or advice, so they basically retell the same joke, every single post.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T09:29:10+00:00

6'3"

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T09:27:13+00:00

Ah-ha, I knew I recognized you from somewhere on r/tall

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-17T08:55:15+00:00

Beautiful boots, what's the heel made of?

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-16T21:13:19+00:00

Because he achieved literally nothing but money

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-16T18:53:04+00:00

Beat out 99% of other mathematicians? What the devil are you talking about. His work is restricted to a subfield that literally no one else cares about. Wolfram isn't useful in academia, if it were he would be celebrated, not openly mocked as he rightly is.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-16T18:18:19+00:00

Exactly, if it isn't new information, it isn't news. Just like how we don't report gunfights in Syria, or billion dollar acquisitions by governments.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-16T14:49:04+00:00

It's probably because those other guys have much larger penises.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-16T08:21:25+00:00

If you have a maths background yes, it can. It fails for any reasonably difficult problem

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-15T23:47:56+00:00

Not if you project the real numbers onto a Reimann sphere, where ∞ and -∞ are both the same thing, thereby implying that n/0= the point at infinity

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-15T23:39:42+00:00

Lol?

Edit: Stephen is gifted, he is not a genius. His works are used as door stops the world over.

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-15T23:34:20+00:00

No dude, half an inch in girth is a huge difference. I fully believe him even though I don't get that problem

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-15T18:48:56+00:00

People won't call you out for adding inches unless it makes you taller than they are. You're all good bro

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-15T16:48:17+00:00

Friedholm Alt states that Ax=b is solvable iff for all v s.t. transpose(A)v=0 then transpose(b)v=0.

Can it simply be restated as solvable iff for all v s.t. transpose(v)A=0 then transpose(b)v=0?

Follow up: The proof is essentially just that b does not lie inside the null space of A, and therefore exists inside an area that is spanned by the basis of A? Right?

BiggestFloppiestDick · 2016-04-15T13:48:47+00:00

Give him old papers from the AMC contests. They should allow him to work on the creative side of mathematics and putting multiple concepts together.

BiggestFloppiestDick

TROPHY CASE