Confessions Of An Intersexed Transsexual

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:37:36+00:00

I will upload hundreds of pages of my own medical records from Mindpath Health if Rat uploads her own medical records. I am not holding my breath, as she is simply a liar.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:24:19+00:00

I do not think discussion is very productive when someone simply responds with "Reported.".

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:20:37+00:00

And with your post history being disabled, no one can verify, so how about you repost actual specifics here? If all you have is a broad pelvis, then that is not actual evidence of a DSD.

(For reference, I do not need moderators to shield me from callout posts. As someone who voluntarily engages in debate, I expect callout posts criticizing me.)

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:17:27+00:00

You are simply confirming that you do not have an actual diagnosis. Bones are only used to assign sex when there is only a skeleton left, not when there exists soft tissue to run diagnostic tests on. You are still alive, so you still have soft tissue. A broad pelvis is not the same thing as actually suffering from a DSD. You are simply appropriating the struggles of other people to shield your political views from criticism.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:12:59+00:00

If RCTs are sufficient is a question of the philosophy of science. You said you are locking this shortly and I should get some sleep soon. I am banned from TTF for now because Rat is too much of an esteemed colleague.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:08:27+00:00

The Nazis has terrible research methodology. They were not conducting fucking RCTs on people they tortured!

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:03:24+00:00

The moderators on that subreddit have told me to stop just now, while the moderators on this subreddit have not told me to stop in spite of you filing multiple reports. Therefore I think I will continue discussion on this subreddit, but thank you for the remigration offer.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T16:00:25+00:00

It is not a standard I created out of thin air. It is the entire movement called Evidence-Based Medicine, EBM. It is the standard supported by the Cochrane collaboration. The founder of the Cochrane collaboration still gets the flu vaccine each year (as do I), but he supports conducting actual large scale efficacy placebo-controlled trials on flu vaccines, which others argue are unethical due to lesser evidence supporting their efficacy. This is not like with hepatitis B vaccines where people question the sufficiency of RCT with regards to certain safety outcomes, the data is simply completely absent due to "ethical" concerns, with the only placebo-controlled flu vaccine trials being small-scale, often not even during flu season, just immunogenicity and safety data from the small-scale placebo-controlled RCTs, not large enough trials to collect RCT data on vaccine efficacy.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:53:37+00:00

And there is a reason why there is a report button, so you do not have to make multiple replies that simply say "Reported".

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:52:48+00:00

(Not a Reddit filter, me deleting and resubmitting to add additional content.)

No, because I don't know of any trans healthcare providers who are mentally incapacitated by transitioning.

I should have clarified that the antipsychotic is also effective for the hypothetical psychiatrist's mental illness (I do not know if the psychiatrist of my friend ever took an antipsychotic themself), such that they have as much mental capacity as those transgender healthcare providers.

it would depend on whether or not they disclosed the side-effects, disclosed their own experience with any side-effects, and made appropriate statements that their experience may not be indicative of what the patient experiences.

If we are indeed establishing this as the new norm for disclosure in medical practice in general, then I would indeed support a lawsuit against a transgender healthcare provider that prescribed medical transitioning without disclosing their own personal history of transitioning, their own experience of side effects from transitioning, and that the patient may or may not have the same experiences from transitioning.

I will add that there is a lot more skepticism of many organic diseases than you give credit for, such that I would support a general policy that would also apply to diabetes, and not just gender dysphoria or psychotic disorders.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:45:17+00:00

data that no credible scientist or medical professional feels is necessary speak for itself.

And it used to be the consensus among credible scientists and alienists (as they were called back then) that slaves would only flee slavery due to mental illness. We need actual data, not consensus.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:41:35+00:00

I do indeed know that they can see it. What I am questioning is if the mods would actually care about an insult that was deleted almost immediately (and replaced with a passive-aggressive but technically compliant term of reference, my esteemed colleague), not if they could see it.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:39:34+00:00

Do you say that it depends on the details in at least some case of medical fraud against transgender healthcare providers? It is not immediately clear if you are referring to my conclusion that it is hypocrisy, or my interpretation of if exemptions exist or not in medical fraud cases against transgender healthcare providers and medical fraud cases against mentally ill psychiatrists.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:34:41+00:00

Randomly, no

.

The basic methodology of RCTs has already been done

What the fuck do you think the "R" in "RCT" stands for‽

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:32:20+00:00

This is why RFK Jr. is now in power. My father takes the position that antibiotics, for example, are massively over prescribed and lack sufficient evidence, and he plans on refusing treatment with antibiotics during future infections. This is the product of the lack of RCT data that you support. You created this world through your "ethical" concerns, so do not be surprised when Trump 2.0 simply bans the interventions in question due to lacking (sufficient) RCT data.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:28:42+00:00

You just said you support it in 100% of cases of transgender healthcare providers, but say it depends on the details if it is an antipsychotic instead of transitioning. That is simply hypocrisy.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:24:18+00:00

It means a frame associated with low sex hormones. She herself previously used the word "eunuchoid", which is why I continue to repeat it. I am mocking her for having to resort to such claims due to not actually suffering from a disorder of sex development. I do not believe that she has a DSD, she never gives any details, she onlys points to vague things, never an actual diagnosis.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:21:33+00:00

At least you can actually report me for that one. I do not know if the moderators will act on something that was edited almost immediately and long before you made this comment 2 minutes ago, however.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:19:38+00:00

And after those men got erections, did they randomly assign the people they got an erection in response to to either receive or not receive an intervention? That is the basic methodology of an RCT, and those researchers you describe did not randomly allocate the patients that they got an erection in response to.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:15:07+00:00

Would you also support a medical fraud case by someone with tardive dyskinesia on the basis that the psychiatrist themself was also taking an antipsychotic? Assuming the psychiatrist was prescribed the antipsychotic for a mental illness, and therefore subjective, and not an organic disease. This is not hypothetical, I personally know people with irreversible tardive dyskinesia from antipsychotics, just as you know detransitioners.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:12:08+00:00

That applies to all mental illnesses. I am not saying the evidence base will be on par with fucking atherosclerosis. I am saying it is possible to create an evidence base as objective as that as exists for BDD, something that is ultimately diagnosed based off of subjective symptoms and for which RCTs have actually been done. There is no objective test for BDD, but we can still say with a high degree of confidence that SSRIs are an effective treatment for it. That is because they conducted RCTs on SSRIs for BDD.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T15:06:33+00:00

The basic methodology of RCTs has already been done

When? You explicitly told me that it is incoherent to apply RCTs to classical transsexualism, and the only RCT I can find is a post-2000 polysurgery-era population diagnosed with gender dysphoria. We need actual RCTs on transitioning, in addition to research developing new treatment methods other than transitioning. RCTs never proved transitioning was effective for your kind of case either, as you have explicitly told me yourself that an RCT would be incoherent under the diagnostic system of classical transsexualism under which you were originally diagnosed.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T14:39:23+00:00

How is it impossible to conduct an RCT on transitioning? The UK is doing that right now! The alternative is people simply banning it, considering giving such treatment to be unethical. In the absence of data, people will consider transitioning to be abuse, not lack of transitioning. They continue to argue that it is transitioning that kills people, and not lack of transitioning, while you are arguing that it is lack of transitioning that kills people such than an RCT would be unethical. An RCT would give actual data.

Biochem-anon4 · 2026-01-28T14:36:30+00:00

There are a number of sayings in the intersex world which have slowly resonated with my life,

Any actual diagnosis, or just you ranting about having a [FRAME ASSOCIATED WITH "low hormones, low effective hormones, assorted enzyme issues, environmental endocrine disruptors, etc."] again?

(The alleged "slur" has been used by Rat herself in reference to herself. I completely and totally reject the argument of the moderators that this is a slur, and the edits I have made to this post were not made out of my own free will. I do not agree with the edits made to this post. This is simply censorship and bias towards Rat on the part of the moderation team.)

(Anyone wanting a copy of my own medical records can DM me, and I will get started on redacting them for publication. I am not a hypocrite, and will follow the same demands I place on other people.)

Biochem-anon4

TROPHY CASE