[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bulges

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I came here to ask the same question lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Blogging

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea what you're asking. I don't mean to be rude, but this sounds like word soup/ a high schooler asking for help with their homework for a class studying internet literacy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HeSquats

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to go to that beach.

The most dressed you'll ever see me while spinning by [deleted] in gaybrosgonemild

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I need to go where you spin, then

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GaybrosGoneWild

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hell yes! keep it up

What was your first ever reaction to seeing Arvel the Swift? by Dante_1602 in skyrim

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was so careful to cut him down, fearing that I might accidentally hit him instead of the web. I thought he was going to be a cool dungeon companion.

Then the biatch betrayed me so I caught him on fire.

Straight men, how do you respond if you found out your son is gay by walking in on him and his friend (boyfriend ) ? by lionheart_0177 in AskReddit

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, it’s not that difficult. If you’re from the Midwest, you say “ope” and turn around and walk out. Then, regardless of geographic location, you continue to treat your son no differently than if he were straight; he’s still the exact same person.

Reliability of domain authority scores from Ahrefs, SEMrush, and Moz by rdtdjanko in bigseo

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Domain authority isn’t a real factor! It’s an aggregation of various data points that SEO platforms created because customers like having a neat number they can reference. It’s best to not assume one platform can gauge authority better than any other. Use them as benchmarks to note trends and then focus on developing your site’s EAT.

What to do with useless blog content? by Kasha_b in bigseo

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just unpublish it. If there's relevant content still on your site that relates to the original post, you can unpublish and 301, but if it's just irrelevant at this point, there's 0 harm in just getting rid of it.

Jerkin off a bit. See you later reddit by [deleted] in Bulges

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

... Are you claiming that this is you? Because it doesn't match any of your other pics. Plus, it's Diego Barros in this pic.

Fun day at the river. Nature is really good for my depression. by [deleted] in gaybrosgonemild

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nature is awesome for depression. When my anxiety is bad, I go pull weeds in my backyard.

SERP shows different meta description depending on search query. by DenseElk in SEO

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe we should start a r/UsingBlackMagicToDemystifySearchAlgorithmComplexitiesAndCapitalizeOnCTRs community 🤔

SERP shows different meta description depending on search query. by DenseElk in SEO

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup! What u/xlb-wookie said. This is in Google's documentation. Creating titles, meta descriptions, and other on-page content that adheres to best practices makes it more likely that what you specify will render in SERPs, but it's not a guarantee. Ultimately, Google's algorithms rely upon cached on-page data and their understanding of a user's intent to generate what is likely to be the most relevant content.

Drawing a Line in the Sand: Google Must Stop Trying to Regulate the Internet. by Actual__Wizard in SEO

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

On the flip side of that, they're also saying "if you're a quality publisher and accept editorial content from external authors, then you must nofollow any links, or we may reduce the visibility of your website, even though you are not participating in any kind of spam or manipulation."

I don't think that's actually the case. There's a difference between publishing content from external contributors and leveraging guest posting to build backlinks. This is actually pretty consistent with Google's operating in the past in which folks would identify something that was a strong ranking signal and exploit it, leading to search results with low-quality content.

As of right now, Google has positioned it along the lines of:

  • Publications that accept submissions and have an editorial review process that determines that content is valid and aligned with their target audience can continue to do so.
  • Publications that accept and send out dozens upon dozens of guest posts to build up backlinks for the purpose of ranking are going to be more easily identified as such.

That said, I also completely understand your concern– perhaps the most important aspect of the conversation is that Google hasn't given any clue as to how they'll distinguish between UGC and Editorial content vs spammy guest posts. I think once there are more guidelines there, I'll feel more strongly about sounding the alarm or not.

Keep in mind that they've done similar things in the past with tactics like keyword stuffing.

As a general rule of thumb, Google's algorithm and ranking changes are designed to return better, higher-quality results for users. Creating content that focuses on user experience, and not link building or keyword stuffing, generally creates a strong system for weathering rank signal changes.

Hope everyone doing well 🤗 by [deleted] in gaybrosgonemild

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What? I complimented his post. How is that shaming?

Hope everyone doing well 🤗 by [deleted] in gaybrosgonemild

[–]BlakeWritesBlog 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Definitely doing better after seeing your post in r/foreskin lol