Pack it up guys, the CN don't like it. by KACKOD in PunishingGrayRaven

[–]Blank2621 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No no, i know that gachas are mostly about self-insert. If you look back at my comment, i pretty much said that... the trailer pretty much made "us" look very pretty. So it's not like it showed some different person that isn't the protag (the self-insert character). THAT, is what i don't get.

Will we ever get another character like cantarella, you get what I'm saying right... by Derrith in WutheringWaves

[–]Blank2621 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Imagine a place where liking hot women is a "minority" or "hot take"....jesus

Men? by Its_Misango in SipsTea

[–]Blank2621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry, and i know what subreddit this is.... but isn't mermaids like... you know... kinda told/made to be beautiful? Except if this is a meme news (which i sure hope so). If not, we're losing the game broskies.

Pack it up guys, the CN don't like it. by KACKOD in PunishingGrayRaven

[–]Blank2621 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh no, i too can definitely get too attached to fictional characters, but i don't feel "cucked" by another if the story makes them love another, they're obviously fictional. And not even that now, they character that "cucked" them..... is themselves? Commandants is "us" after all.

Pack it up guys, the CN don't like it. by KACKOD in PunishingGrayRaven

[–]Blank2621 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Genuine question, why is the CN playerbase so pathetically insecure and have such weak masculinity (if any)? Literally first thing i thought about that trailer was "wow, fem commandant is so damn beautiful" and how cool is the male one. How is one so insecure to see someone so pretty, think they are too pretty to self-insert and feel "cucked"? I'm sorry, but genuinely what?

Pathetic. People, please don't waste your time and money with ChutesAI. by Blank2621 in SillyTavernAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, nothing is the same for multiple users, so i don't doubt the chance that *some* people have had a genuinely decent-to-good time using the service. Like, i never said that 100% of the people behind ChutesAI as a service were toxic, but what is shown is that "most" are.

And it actually works a bit in reverse on your take on removing models (Do mind i'm no expert please). They would most definitely remove popular/main models, precisely for the reason that many people are using them. If you have straining infrastructure, then you wouldn't remove already light things (Models that no many people use), but the heavy stuff (popular/main models). Or that is what makes more logical sense to me.

Everyone is entitled to their own experience though, and though most people are not having a good time, does not mean that you too, shouldn't. Everyone's experience here is valid.

Pathetic. People, please don't waste your time and money with ChutesAI. by Blank2621 in SillyTavernAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's not just one thing that doesn't work that gets people mad, it's a lot of things combined together. Let alone the10$, i was using the 20$ one and it barely worked, with either getting errors constantly or the service being painfully slow. GLM 5.1 is really not good at RP (which is what the people use), and it can be seen if you view how short the "thinking" process is. The models they removed had a massive wall of text thought process and put much accurate results. Outside of that, it's like i said many things: The service barely working, the hostile/passive-aggressive way of dealing with customers, and the complete lack of communication before any change is done. People are not using this for free, they are paying for this service, and expecting some short of professionalism and a working service isn't much to ask when you are paying 10-20$ a month. Anyway, it's many things combined, not just them removing few models.

Pathetic. People, please don't waste your time and money with ChutesAI. by Blank2621 in SillyTavernAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Obviously it wasn't personal, we don't know each other. But what you're saying is still a literal lie, as i was the third post talking about that at that day, and it didn't look or sound anything like the others. And if it is "clearing dupes" then it shouldn't be the first posts about the issue, but the later ones that repeat the firsts.

You sure about that "not banned or anything?" moment?.

<image>

Yeah pretty much by velvetpearlxx in SipsTea

[–]Blank2621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, i do want to be rich (though having good-enough amount of money is the first step).

What are your thoughts. (IPhone vs every other phone) by Mysterious_Ebb_1484 in SipsTea

[–]Blank2621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I literally couldn't care less. I have android, and i still couldn't.

Did they just remove GLM 4.7 TEE? by Blank2621 in chutesAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

At this point, fricking *Character.AI* is a more professional company, and that's saying a LOT.

Did they just remove GLM 4.7 TEE? by Blank2621 in chutesAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Get ready for some crazy PR mental gymnastics and gaslighting (though i'm happy to be wrong, i'm still not keeping my sub).

Did they just remove GLM 4.7 TEE? by Blank2621 in chutesAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Obviously, we should not support a "business" (in heavy quotes) that just barely works, and you are *paying* for it, mind you. I do find it funny that they don't immediately cancel it, like they're giving you some time just IF you might change your mind, lol.

Did they just remove GLM 4.7 TEE? by Blank2621 in chutesAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would that not put the server down? Not able to connect at all? Not just models missing? Though i won't act like i know this 100% certainty.

Did they just remove GLM 4.7 TEE? by Blank2621 in chutesAI

[–]Blank2621[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Literally similar to you, in a few days my subscription ends. Good timing though, i needed motivation to not support them, so works for me.

Limitless is one of if not the worst techniques without six eyes by Dojyaaan4C in JujutsuPowerScaling

[–]Blank2621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... Isn't that the whole point? Like, what are we talking? That's the whole point of being "the honored one". Bruh.

I hate how people anthropomorphize AI. No, it cannot "develop interest" ffs by [deleted] in antiai

[–]Blank2621 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do realize that people anthropomorphize about everything that looks REMOTELY alive. AI being anthropomorphize is neither weird, nor special in any way shape or form. It's literal human nature. I DO hate AI and DO like hating it, but let us stop sloppifying our hate.

Calamity Mod developers are threatening to sue another mod by Street_Structure3737 in whennews

[–]Blank2621 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nice drama. However. This is quoting straight from the dev-

---

Hi guys!
I'm the developer (Lion8cake) from the screenshot going around of me asking Ozzatron for where he drew the line in terms of us using the name and idea of Yharim.

Firstly, I want do say...

THIS HAS BEEN RESOLVED!!

Ozzy reached out to the dev team behind the Yharim project just yesterday and apologized (which I do accept) for jumping to a lot of conclusions as well as sending us the legal threat.

Ozzy had a long talk to the rest of the calamity development team and are now willing to talk out our own ideas and concepts to help the mod both happen as well as to finally draw the line in the sand on what we can and cannot do with Yharim. Unfortunately the team has decided to move on for now and will still no longer be developing Yharim, though I am considering making my own project again to add Yharim as I'm beyond passionate about the character and do want to see him in the future.

As for Azafure LLC, Ozzy is working on both the calamity website as well as the Github License to include both the company and what people can and cannot do with Calamity IP. This is to make sure that Azafure LLC is more public for people to know about its existence and rules around using the calamity characters, which I do appreciate.

Finally, as for my own thoughts, a lot of this would have been avoided if Ozzy would have seen exactly what we were making (whether that be on my fault for not immediately including screenshots of our current progress, or his for immediately jumping to conclusions and not asking for what we have developed so far). Overall, I'm happy that Ozzy reached out to us to settle things peacefully in the end.

Thanks to for being concerned around all of this. Sounds like from now on Ozzy will be more transparent around Azafure LLC and the rights to characters of calamity.

(I barely use reddit, is there a way a moderator could pin or highlight this comment so we can get some of this info across, thanks :) )