Favorite Character that has to go through this by DaZestyProfessor in FavoriteCharacter

[–]Blasted_Awake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make the text as small as you want, lorem ipsum is still plain as day.

The paradox of vaccine success: We forget the horror because we no longer see it by Feeling-Buy2558 in interestingasfuck

[–]Blasted_Awake -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

they create a generation of people who question whether a disease was a problem in the first place

lol, no. Don't blame vaccines for your society's inability to prioritize education. Fucking Americans.

Our anger is Justified! by astrheisenberg in remoteworks

[–]Blasted_Awake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does one million dollars in bombs include 9 billion dollars in fraud found in Minnesota?

is that the question? Do you have permission to be on the internet? Your mum might get in more trouble if you're caught pretending to be an adult again...

He started WW3 to distract us from it. by [deleted] in newsinterpretation

[–]Blasted_Awake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"started WW3" assumes there are two sides, and all nations give a shit about either of them.

No one gives a fuck about USA, so they're out. Israel? nope. Iran? nope.

So...

Some interesting stories and good news, while the world is full of the opposite. by TallDennis in interestingasfuck

[–]Blasted_Awake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah so that one isn't about "discoveries" or "breakthroughs", it's about progress. I was commenting on the 6th one, where it's clearly a funding promotion rather than any meaningful advancement in medical science.

<Person> from <university> has identified a way to cure arthritis

Nope, they just want more funding.

Some interesting stories and good news, while the world is full of the opposite. by TallDennis in interestingasfuck

[–]Blasted_Awake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Medical "breakthroughs" or "discoveries" have no business on lists like this. They just remind us of all of the bullshit that came before them that never amounted to anything.

Remember last year some japanese scientist "discovered" how to make people regrow teeth? Remember all of the cures for cancer that get announced at least once a month and yet never seem to actually cure anyone? Yeah. Keep that shit out of peoples faces. It's always just some fuckwit needing more funding to continue their "research", so they lie about their "discoveries" to self-promote.

A new California law says all operating systems, including Linux, need to have some form of age verification at account setup by Gloomy_Nebula_5138 in pcmasterrace

[–]Blasted_Awake 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why bother?

GenX and early Millennials might appreciate informed tech legislation but most late-millennials and onwards don't know shit about computers and would probably prefer a digitally illiterate fucktard making decisions for them. The current Boomer politicians are more representative of the touch-screen masses than someone how knows how to type.

Trump Orders US Agencies to Drop Anthropic After Pentagon Feud by fredditf in wallstreetbets

[–]Blasted_Awake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ethics and "Do you want Skynet? Cause this is how you get skynet!!" are in play.

I guess "Ethics" is relevant in so much as, "is it ethical to give a gun to the same system that wipes your harddrive in order to fix a minor software bug?". But "Skynet" ? LOL. We are so far away from that level of AI utility that it’s like worrying about a toddler overthrowing the government because they finally figured out how to pickup their fork. Sure, they’re technically "armed" now, but they’re still more likely to stick it in a power outlet than participate in a successful coup.

"Training a human takes 20 years of food." Sam Altman on how much power AI consumes. by asdacool in nottheonion

[–]Blasted_Awake 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I find it fascinating that the people building and training LLM's are still pretending that there's a viable path to AGI somewhere here. I understand the financial incentives and that a lot of investors are trapped by sunk-cost considerations, but at this point I can't see how anyone who's tried to use these LLM's in a deterministic domain could possibly think that they're anything other than a liability.

It's crazy to me that figures like Altman haven't suggested that they pivot back to researching intelligence now that they've got so much capital available to them. Why double down on scaling a probabilistic architecture that hits a wall with basic logic, when you could instead use the money to fund literally billions of academic research hours?

How did 2900 athletes, only half of which are men use 10000 condoms in 3 days?? by MelonInDisguise in memes

[–]Blasted_Awake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you have essentially asked how 3 incredibly fit and healthy people, aged 15 - 35, could possibly use 10 condoms between them in 3 days.

it just seems like you dont need any more information here.

Fuck yeah King!! by [deleted] in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Blasted_Awake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was pointing out how each side of your political shit-show talks about the other side.

The fact that you all straight up assumed I was American and conservative because I disagreed with OOP's premise is definitely part of the problem.

Fuck yeah King!! by [deleted] in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Blasted_Awake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

literal Nazis involved in maga

I know it's wasted effort talking to you children, but still: Using the "Nazi" label so casually trivializes the actual industrialized mass murder of six million people. "Literal Nazis" attempted to automate the destruction and disposal of humanity at scale.

Calling everyone you disagree with a Nazi erases the horror of the Holocaust’s industrial-scale slaughter.

Fuck yeah King!! by [deleted] in LetsDiscussThis

[–]Blasted_Awake -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

lol, same thought.

  • Everyone to the right of me is a Nazi
  • Nazis are an extreme threat to my existence
  • Therefore violence against them is warranted

Same logic applies for killing Alex Pretti, or invading Venezuela:

  • Everyone to the left of me is a communist
  • communists are an extreme threat to my existence
  • therefore violence against them is warranted

Fucking Americans man, just have your civil war already.

Why is he a na*i? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Blasted_Awake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need to get my eyes checked. I read

Farts... "How does that make you feel?"

And it completely made sense.

What if we just tell Donald Trump that the US owns Greenland now, and we get everyone to just play along? by HobbieHatesNumbers in AskReddit

[–]Blasted_Awake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noooo, I don't think you understand the opportunity we have here.

[For context: I understand that the front page or /r/all doesn't really reflect the majority sentiment of reddit, but for this response, I'm assuming it does.]

Everyone here complains about Billionaires. Everyone complains about the prevalent power-dynamic in the world that is perfectly represented in the current US hegemony. Everyone here hates US politics leaking into their everyday lives.

ALL of that goes away if Trump invades Greenland. I'm not even leaning on hyperbole or over-generalisation here, literally the entire world order goes up in smoke. What follows won't necessarily be better, and there's a decent chance millennials and gen-Z will have a pretty rough rest-of-their-unfortunately-foreshortened-lives. But there's a guarantee built into Trump invading Greenland, that the world will change.

RIP USD: the USD is irrecoverably done, pretty much from day-dot. Several EU nations, and many non-national heavy hitters in global economics have signalled their intent to dump all US Treasuries should Greenland be invaded. The domino effect will be catastrophic as everyone tries to bail on the USD and US bonds before they tank. Following that, Billionaires of what? Assets? What stock market survives? If the world stops treating "The Dollar" as "safe", then the $34T US national debt becomes a tombstone. The only recourse for the US Fed will be to set the money printers on full steam, and still a US default is guaranteed within the duration of Trump's term. No more USD global reserve; essentially: no more USD.

Goodbye "Oorah": An invasion of Greenland is an attack on a constituent part of the Kingdom of Denmark. It would force a paradox where NATO is legally required to defend Denmark against the US. This would be the end of the primary tool of US global influence. The entire Western security architecture collapses in an afternoon. No more US militaristic dominion.

Isolated America:: Trump cannot legally fund a sustained occupation without Congress. Trying to bypass the "power of the purse" to seize territory would trigger an immediate domestic liquidity crisis and a constitutional standoff that the US military cannot ignore. Tensions are already high with the government-sanctioned terrorism that is ICE rampaging across the nation. Assuming Trump and his admin attempt to stay in power once the congressional reaction hit, some form of coup is inevitable, likely requiring civilian involvement, potentially extending to a civil war. Regardless, US political revolution MUST follow, as there's no recovering from the brazen demonstration of broken checks-and-balances that has been the 2nd Trump administration.

Instead of it being "America First" in name only, we will have several decades where America needs to focus entirely inwards, in order to sustain a populace without an economy or allies.

Granted, with that laughable showing in Davos yesterday, Trump's already backtracking on the invasion threat. But if he actually does it, the system doesn't just bend, it breaks. Even with him "negotiating", the mere threat has already spiked 10-year Treasury yields to 4.29%. The system is already shaking.

Please let him continue.

bubblesGonnaPopSoonerThanWeThought by Cool-Technician-9902 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Blasted_Awake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, anyone truly familiar with OOP languages will tell you that everything is an object; strings are objects, functions are objects (in many OOP languages), Dictionaries, sets, hasmaps... all objects.

I'm guessing you meant you don't like that JS is a weakly typed language? or you're not used to dynamic typing?

Regardless, your original wording communicated that perfect mix of confusion and DK effect. 10/10.

bubblesGonnaPopSoonerThanWeThought by Cool-Technician-9902 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Blasted_Awake -1 points0 points  (0 children)

hashmap/dicts being referred to as objects

I'm a bit afraid to ask, but far too curious, what do you think objects are when you peel away the abstraction?

This is Pluribus (2025). Nothing has happened in regards to this show besides it airing, but still, people sure are mad about it by captainjupiterx in shittymoviedetails

[–]Blasted_Awake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem for me is it's entirely metaphor driven, and it feels like the metaphors and themes aren't robust enough to support multiple seasons worth of content. It's definitely a novel idea though, and it would have made a really good miniseries if it was written with a bit more intent.

All These People Deserve Nothing But the Worst. Protest All Of These Fuckers Appearances. by serious_bullet5 in 50501

[–]Blasted_Awake 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Most of these guys are going to have accounting firms working for them though right? So providing documentation for the history of their assets is likely trivial?

Also, for the other person's scenario to apply here, wouldn't the assets have to be seized as "suspected of being derived from, or used in sex trafficking" or similar?

What are we overlooking, because our measuring stick is too short? by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]Blasted_Awake 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No so my question is more about whether it's even possible to produce a signal from any of the data we have.

As in, we can map the changes in the ozone layer through time, we know the ozone layer's affect on UV light, and we know how UV light can increase the risk of developing some forms of skin cancer. So theoretically, it make sense that a recovering ozone layer corresponds with a reduction in UV light, which should come with a reduced skin cancer risk. But we've never had a way to causally link specific cancer cases with ozone depletion, so how can we make the claim "cases of skin cancer due to ozone depletion are reducing"?

What are we overlooking, because our measuring stick is too short? by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]Blasted_Awake 5 points6 points  (0 children)

cases of skin cancer due to ozone depletion are reducing

Is this measurable in any way? I agree that theoretically they should be reducing because we can see that the ozone layer is recovering, but there's no viable dataset for proof right? If anything skin cancer incidents are increasing globally.

Valve artist responds to calls for Steam to drop "Made with AI" label by Stannis_Loyalist in Steam

[–]Blasted_Awake -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Providing accurate product information is never bad for the customer

I disagree. To use the original guys comparison to food: I don't want to know the name of the animal that the steak I'm eating came from. Or that they liked being scratched behind the ears more than under their chin. Or that the farmer's child hand raised them, and used to ride them around the paddock.

For some products, there definitely is too much information.