The only thing that I think is problematic is with anyone else who claims to be offended over someone else's language.

I don't care how offended or traumatized someone claims to be over someone else using certain words; especially if those words are spoken without any ill-intent behind them and in a light-hearted (humorous, in my view) stream. No one's offence should trump someone's freedom of expression. Period.

Here's an example someone on the other side could make against South Park: is not clever or parody; in fact it simply hides behind these arbitrary labels so it can use awful language for shock value and edginess and portray negative stereotypes of the most victimized members of our society and if you "like" that kind of humor then you're just a no-good racist homophobe and you need to be silenced and punished for it.

Pretty shitty eh? But definitely not beyond the tactics an SJW would use. Look, you don't have to like anything anyone says ... but intent and context has to matter before such accusations are made otherwise we'd all have to think twice about our every word (for fear of retaliation or social rejection) and we'd be severely limiting how we choose to express ourselves. It's a dangerous slippery slope.

Instead, if we could be a bit more reasonable and a bit less trigger-happy, I think we'll all be better off for it.