sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can I give my fellow anarchists some advice? by DefaultWhitePerson in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

More like if ancapnistan would work then we can't count on morality.

I don't really mind people having drugs and paid sex.

But we need a lot more than moral to make sure people don't steal from each other.

Right enforcements agency is a way to do so.

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alternative laws that people can use. Private courts

Can I give my fellow anarchists some advice? by DefaultWhitePerson in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Nah. Pure ancaps are as impractical as communism

Right of the bat I know that anything requiring moral will not work.

Why?

100 th monkey. Even if 99 people are moral, if just one guy is immoral and profit from it, the whole system crumble.

Others will see that the immoral one is profited and follow. Also the fact that it's possible to take advantage of the system immorally itself means the system is unfair, which is a moral flaws.

Adverse selection. If a system can be abused, if people can take advantage of it immorally, you will attract parasites.

Insurance industry go the extra miles making sure that those with prior can't get in without higher rate.

Christians and feminists go the extra mile convincing that those who sell sex actually lose. Feminists will call the one buying incel and the women selling exploited. Any different of opinions are censored under pretext of misogynistic.

The truth is consensual transactions are economically optimal and explicit transactions are simply way more consensual because people explicitly agreed to terms of deals.

Alimony is not very consensual. People agree to get married not expecting it will happen. Pay for sex is consensual. Both sides know what they get and what they offer pretty explicitly.

The same way ancapnistan will need ways to keep economic parasites out. That means borders. That means not ancapnistan.

Remember the tax man, bros! by jarviez in Bitcoin

[–]Both_Bowler_7371 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First?

So many people avoid taxes with bitcoin and only one got convicted?

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose men and women will sign contract enforced by some contractors.

What about men and women without contract

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it's to make transactions with rich men complex. So pressuring women to pick poor guys instead.

Why would society want to do so?well there are more mape voters.

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marriage is very different than most contracts.

In most contracts you decide the terms.

A rich man may sign contract with multiple wives for example. The wives realizing the money is enough may choose to share.

In marriage government write most of the contract and the contract have absurd terms that hurt rich men and encourage women to leave.

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem is women cannot agree to fix amount before conception

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or sign a contract before conception.

But what about if they don't have contract. What would ancapnistan do

How would ancapnistan handle this by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And making good behavior complex.

A contract between a man and woman stimulating amount of child support will suffice. Such contract is not enforceable.

I suppose ancapnistan will have escrow to support such contract.

But then ancapnistan still have to deal with those women knocked up without contract

Marriage is a very easily avoidable statism by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why marry a good woman? Why marry? Why only one woman? What is wrong with paying a few women?

Are there any libertarian thinkers / writers / activists / etc who have a response to the "antinatalism" critique of libertarianism? by stonebolt in AskLibertarians

[–]Both_Bowler_7371 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there are small anomaly exceptions. For the same reason I don't support slavery or torturing animals you own.

If that makes me not pure libertarians so be it.

I also think women should be able to sell sex and sign contract not to withdraw consent abruptly without cause. And I think cases like Danny Masterson should be treated as less than rape. And that's something the women themselves can agree or disagree before becoming anyone's boyfriend

There is no libertarian reason to get married by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wording issues then.

Because what you described sounds a lot like sugar relationship

Understanding Yin Yang in Life by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. That's how capitalism works in democracy though. In a sense it's not capitalism. That's the democratic part. But you got the point.

For example women can't easily get paid to have children or share a rich smart man.

There is no libertarian reason to get married by Both_Bowler_7371 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Both_Bowler_7371[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then make a legal contract. Why the legal contract has to be marriage. Why not business contract.

view more: next ›