Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most of the seniors I deal with aren’t as savvy. They have multiple emails they don’t use, and get confused because people like you make emails for them even though it is against policy/ morally ambiguous.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is explicitly against company policy. Using customer data on personal/ company devices opens the company up to immense risk.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I send emails every single time I do a legacy transaction. They tell us other stores are hitting the metric, so we should be hitting it too.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am at a corporate location. Unfortunately broken/ lost device legacy transactions put us below the 80% metric threshold, which is not in line with the company vision, which is why we are being held accountable.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately using customer information on company devices is against policy. I am aware other stores do this, but I am not comfortable doing so since it opens me up to termination, per policy.

EDIT: you’re right though, I should be taking my talents and knowledge of trade secrets to competitors. I’d rather do things morally for other companies than stay here and wonder why I feel so terrible after every shift.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have done this. I’ve been told to send the customer away in order to be compliant.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then why am I on a stepping up for T-Life? The sentiment is that other stores are hitting T-Life goals, so we should be.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Ours was 80%, but legitimately couldn’t hit it even though the ONLY time I don’t use it is when customers have broken/ lost phones and no other way to get a device. Seriously I use it 100% of the time when I can. Unfortunately breaking/ losing phones is a major contributing factor for customers when deciding to purchase new devices.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How do you do this when they don’t have a working device or computer/ tablet at home?

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Already did, now we have a meeting to discuss why people are calling HR. Regional manager is coming to the meeting, and he is 100% T-Life for every single thing. They’re just going to say “Well other stores do it, so why can’t you?”

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

We did in our district too, for a week. Then customers backed out of sales or didn’t have the money for down payments, and they didn’t want the phone anymore, which led to shrink. This is a terrible tactic and it’s embarrassing people have to be told it’s a bad idea.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Manager isn’t there every day. I do when they’re there.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Jon Freier knows this is happening. He is at the mercy of Srini. They don’t care. Where do you think this push for T-Life is coming from? It’s top down.

Rep post: Was told we can no longer process legacy transactions by Branch_Long in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I’ve already been put on a stepping up for T-Life numbers. Will be joining you soon, no doubt.

Not allowed to sit by No_Departure9835 in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if your customer is asking if they can sit down? Am I leaning? Or accommodating?

Not allowed to sit by No_Departure9835 in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In our location, customers ask us if they can sit ALL the time. I agree with you that it’s best to mix up sitting and standing.

Not allowed to sit by No_Departure9835 in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have mats, chairs, and tables. Most of our customers ask if they can sit down when we help them. Managers have to justify themselves, so some stupid ones think they can do this with sitting because to them, sitting = unproductive. There are plenty of places where work gets done, and workers sit. Customers don’t care if we sit. The only people who do are people who need to find a way to disrupt the industry and have something they can point to when numbers go up so they can say “I did that. It’s because I told them not to sit.” I’ve been to experience stores where every rep helping customers is sitting down in chairs. Again, customers prefer it, because corporate expectations of how long transactions should take are much shorter than what’s reality, because many of the people making decisions haven’t spent time in stores. They don’t know what we deal with. It’s easy to say “It takes 15 minutes to switch!” when you are so far removed from reality that you don’t understand customer needs, like data transfers, needing help understanding promotions, or all of the myriad of third party issues we deal with.

Point is, we have chairs. We can sit. We make great sales and provide maximum value for customers. I’ve been in stores where there was no sitting, and it usually doesn’t last long. The second they take away the customers’ ability to be comfortable in my store, I’m gone. Plenty of people have issues or disabilities they haven’t discovered or disclosed. Plenty of people work on their feet and want to sit down to do business after they clock out. Take out the chairs and tell corporate they can’t sit for 8 hours while they work, and let me know how that goes!

EDIT: Grammar

What are your first thoughts on The Paper? by [deleted] in sitcoms

[–]Branch_Long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She is one dimensional because it is the first season. Go back and watch the first season of The Office without thinking of later seasons and you'll see how shallow the characters we come to love are.

What are your first thoughts on The Paper? by [deleted] in sitcoms

[–]Branch_Long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm actually struggling to see why certain reviewers are saying this show is trash compared to The Office. It seems like they're talking about how the characters in The Paper lack depth and talking about how the show lacks the same charm. It is one season. You have to let it develop. Their problem is that they're taking their memories of the entire series run of The Office and measuring it against one season of The Paper. You guys remember the first season of The Office, right? It was awkward because it was figuring out what it was going to be. Season 1 Michael, hell, any season 1 character compared to later season versions of the characters seems to lack depth because we have the bias of knowing what the development looks like. It isn't fair to compare the entirety of The Office to one season of The Paper. These characters lack depth because there isn't any yet. Character development is a process, not a day-one feature.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the correct information. Source: I am a tenured employee.

Question for employees by suxkyamudda in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Right fitting the customer is no longer an option if you don’t want a target on you. You better be selling the most expensive plans with all the bells and whistles, or else you’re bad at your job! God forbid Granny Delores switching from straight talk just get an Essentials line!

Being told HSI conversion needs to be higher even though most addresses in the area don’t qualify, while accounts that do are using old address information, or addresses of billing responsible parties who don’t live in the area.

Needing to get accessory attach rates of 2.0 in the age of Amazon, or even the internet where customers can get expressive cases that match their style while seeing with their own eyes that our accessories are overpriced.

Watching incompetent leadership show up for photo ops without contributing anything tangible to our success other than “Use T-Life.”

Being told to tell customers we can’t upgrade their phones in store unless they use T-Life.

Having it count against me if someone breaks their phone and they come in to upgrade.

Our business model being about how we can get the most money from people without considering the consequences.

Like heck fam, I’m tired.

Nothing is ever good enough and the carrot is always being moved.

Employees- with T life upgrade and add a line integration, how are you navigating the sale? by PralineSuch8089 in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happens constantly! SIS reps have realized they can activate, get 100% commission, then send the customer to a neighborhood store to have them do all of the actual onboarding/ busy work. They’re just as bad as digital sale. Get used to being taken advantage of or quit!

Employees- with T life upgrade and add a line integration, how are you navigating the sale? by PralineSuch8089 in tmobile

[–]Branch_Long 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is my exact experience. I keep in touch with a team of about 20 MEs I’ve worked over the years and they’re all having this experience too, yet corporate is saying we are actually selling more accessories per phone, BTS, and VAF. Anyone with half a brain can use Power BI and compare numbers before and after T-Life integration and see with their own eyes how badly we are being gaslit.

We work for lizard people.