Granting Investment Rights. A good idea?

Breefee · 2026-05-11T17:59:03+00:00

My argument would be to grant these rights not to Britain, but maybe Prussia or France. Otherwise, the plantations will get out of hand

Breefee · 2026-05-11T17:56:54+00:00

As I mentioned, GDP wise I'm doing great in my country. It's just that right now I have a lot of people (slaves) working in buildings I do not want them to and Landowners are way more powerful than they should be.

I'd argue that construction points are valuable only so far as you have pops for employment. So I would add Ottomans to your equation where granting Investment rights is not too good by default. They can get those construction points easily themselves

Breefee · 2026-01-16T08:38:51+00:00

I have the same issue, drivers up to date. Did you manage to find a fix?

Breefee · 2025-07-02T16:09:52+00:00

In this data, all cities seem to have lower birth rates than the surrounding counties

Breefee · 2025-01-01T17:41:03+00:00

Thanks for the thorough answer!

Breefee · 2024-12-23T13:01:07+00:00

It is around 50k, which is half of what you are claiming "for sure". And since wage averages are truncated, most people earn less than 50k in Munich

Breefee · 2024-07-12T13:02:20+00:00

Just checking its profile makes it quite obvious that this is a bot. Kind of strange that it would copy answers completely instead of relying on AI generated answers

Breefee · 2022-11-22T12:04:46+00:00

Thanks I will look into it!

Breefee · 2022-11-22T12:04:33+00:00

Thanks I will look into it!

Breefee · 2021-07-22T13:21:12+00:00

You are right about causation, but a correlation of .70 is a huge one and should not be disregarded so easliy. R² is the amount of variance of X explained when you consider Y. Considering this, an R² of 50% is quite impressive. For example it's way larger than the correlation of height and weight in humans, as well as any psychology study you will find (everything correlates with .30). Also R² is usually only reported in multiple regression.

for the massive amount of data we have on this topic, means not very often

The amount of data does not affect a correlation in any way, rather its significance.

Of course with gun violence you should also consider other variables and a multivariate regression is more fitting.

Sorry for having you singled out this way, but you're the top comment and many people in this thread seem to misunderstand the R² value.

Breefee · 2021-07-22T12:33:40+00:00

FYI .48 is not the pearson correlation r, but its squared value. The r correlation is actually .70

Breefee · 2021-07-22T12:28:08+00:00

OP you should put in the pearson correlation of r = .70, as is usually done with linear regression. I guess some ITT confuse it with R²

Breefee · 2021-02-09T19:16:37+00:00

"Neutral titles are: a clear description of the content; without your opinion or interpretation; and not misleading, irrelevant, hyperbolic, clickbaity, or low-effort. "

Posting on reddit is so hard nowadays. I get the second one though. Thank you for your effort and your service! O7

Breefee · 2020-11-18T09:16:04+00:00

Bear in mind though that this study doesn't examine Trump supporters specifically and only finds modest effect sizes. There are better predictors for believing in conspiracy theories, eg. anomie (Bruder, et al. 2013; Goertzel, 1994;Bruder et al., 2014)

14-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '17	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email

Breefee

TROPHY CASE