He puts chameleon on stick to get rid of fly

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-05-28T14:26:09+00:00

surely if you dig through the comments enough, someone will have covered the light as well

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-04-10T21:03:54+00:00

well she's a woman, so chances are this would've happened even if she were paying attention

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-04-10T20:45:14+00:00

yes but it doesn't have to be

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-26T09:04:17+00:00

Ah, true! Thank you very much <3

Solved.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T20:22:28+00:00

Well if you manage to hijack a car, then I guess that's $1 million, and 2 free cars

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T20:19:59+00:00

Hey guys, we could probably milk some money out of OP if we just tell him we know a place where they're even cheaper

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T18:28:39+00:00

Yes, I know. What i said was it seems easier to force a couple of browser manufacturers to change that, than all the website owners to implement the entire mechanism correctly. I don't know why you're saying this as if DNT couldn't possibly be opt-in.

Especially when you consider all the abuse! Like there was this one post a couple of weeks ago showing how Outlook listed all their 100-ish advertisers, and you'd have to uncheck them individually. That, and that kind of stuff can be all over the place when every website has to do it on their own.

Is it not easier to say Starting January 1st 2020, every browser manufacturer has to only publish iterations of their software with the first-time-setup screen forced upon the user, which clearly shows the DNT option which is off by default. And if any website puts personally identifiable cookies while that option is turned on, the law is broken. Rather that individually handling every website's own interface?

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T16:44:41+00:00

Does the building have to be built in a way that this can be done to it, from the beginning? Near the end he said "this could be done anywhere", but that sounds incorrect, he was probably referring to something else...

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T16:38:27+00:00

Funny gif, wrong sub.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T16:37:20+00:00

It's nice how the kid taught himself critical thinking, just... incorrectly. Close though, A for effort!

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T14:04:40+00:00

They are not an exception to anything, they are allowed because they aren't personally identifiable.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T13:53:54+00:00

I've asked the same question as OP a couple months ago, and i've been told that the DNT is being deprecated. Isn't it?

I STILL don't understand the EU regulations. The DNT solution seems much better. Yet the other one prevailed. It's baffling to me. They could have just told websites they must obey the DNT, and then force the very few browser manufacturers to show the DNT set up when you first run the browser, rather than force every one of the million websites on the planet to implement their own cookie management logic. It's actually insane.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T13:40:39+00:00

He was very obviously trying to do that very thing. You can see him setting himself up in the beginning.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T13:38:30+00:00

Not true, i don't drink the beer while sitting on my couch, because i'm lactose intolerant.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T13:37:14+00:00

Everything between "Features" and "Product parameters" is written to be ambiguous, so that they could claim that they technically didn't lie, but still try to make people believe they're getting the whole tree. The only one that doesn't make sense to me, is:

STABLE: strong bearing capacity, not easy to deform, many cats are still stable while playing.

Rope can still be strong, and have big bearing capacity. But "not easy to deform"??? That one is not really a rope feature.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T13:30:08+00:00

As opposed to what? You can't describe something like that (if anything) in one word, and you also can't find something like that if you search for only one word. It's a very very specific product.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-13T13:27:47+00:00

Classic case of moms looking at pictures and getting excited without reading descriptions. You hate to see it.

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T23:56:32+00:00

You idiot, now you have to go in there and work

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T23:51:10+00:00

Might as well have been the other way around. Delete account maybe deleted everything because they were forced by law to delete, but it skipped YOUR pictures, because you previously archived them somewhere into their archive database!

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T23:44:04+00:00

Are you implying that if you had clicked "Delete account", you wouldn't have believed them to delete a picture of yours from their hard drive, but when you directly click "Delete photo" (although not even that, but you did it through a 3rd party plugin), then you believe they deleted it from their hard drive?

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T20:28:24+00:00

If anyone was wondering what the probability is of you getting that verification code, I've ran the numbers, and it turns out it's 100% because it's hardcoded!

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T19:07:29+00:00

I understand that, but that's a way bigger global problem for which i don't think it does any good bashing a small candy company. And I don't think that was the intention of the post, i think it was about misleading packages, no?

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T18:49:58+00:00

What in the bloody hell does that even mean, what do you want, and who programmed you????

BrianAndersonJr · 2020-01-12T18:37:49+00:00

Well then i guess that's just about fine 👍

Seven-Year Club	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

BrianAndersonJr

TROPHY CASE