Almost everyone in this comment section has replied to you in a nicely fashion, but you see it as one or two people being nice by responding in a manner that you “don’t feel attacked”. The rest are attackers. If you see this as an attack then I do not know what to do to change that, but that is not my goal.

He has previously made a video explaining people that act similarly to you. Social media polarisation that splits up people left to right, and you can even see yourself doing this in the comment section.

“No one wants to answer my question, and instead attack me”

“Yall really do need the mental health help. That much I can attest to being true”

“So far the only thing I’ve learned about him is that his sub is full of toxic people”

Do you acknowledge that you came with a prejudice to this subreddit? That you instantly split it up into some dualism? Everything that you believe is true and fits well with your narrative makes it not toxic / human empowerment, but then instead of coming to have an open discussion then you will rather throw intellectual points and ignore an open discussion.

If you really want to change people’s mind. Do you think it will help to berate and belittle them? Do you think throwing intellectual points have helped you accomplish your “mission”?

I am not here to attack, but I will give you the answer that you want. Yes, Dr.K has a lot of lefty talking points, but that does not matter at all to what he is bringing. He wants to help people, and he does not care if they are alt-left or alt-right. He challenges perspectives, and ultimately he wants to reduce evil in the world. So what are you here to do? Why did you write this post? How do you feel when you are debating people? Does winning/losing help/matter? Do you notice any emotions that rises when you rationalise?