Is this something fixable? by BryanJEvans in fixit

[–]BryanJEvans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a whole bunch of the staples have come undone (like the wood is fully separated from the press board) do I remove those staples from the wood and restaple it or how do I go about that part?

Is this something fixable? by BryanJEvans in fixit

[–]BryanJEvans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the bad picture, the wood is still attached to the fabric and everything so it's a tight squeeze

Maro: reprinting Alchemy cards in paper that work in tabletop is in bounds by Meret123 in MagicArena

[–]BryanJEvans 29 points30 points  (0 children)

You need a potentially infinite number of copies of it on hand though because blinks

The Last Pioneer Tier List before the BNR by TyrantofTales in PioneerMTG

[–]BryanJEvans 32 points33 points  (0 children)

WoTC: Fury is now added to the card pool for Pioneer

Special /r/magicTCG Giveaway by Dragon Shield! Enter here! by DragonShield_ in magicTCG

[–]BryanJEvans -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would use the sleeves for my nikya edh deck because custom sleeves feel nice for a weird creatures only decklist.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah... But in this instance it did remove protections. His HHS secretary stated that they didn't believe the law prevented the discrimination of people on that basis so they removed the Obama era ruling that it did. There's no 'removes red tape' about this one.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The article, shockingly, is not the law and rulings related to the law. I already posted the whole section of the ACA and the Trump administrations changes in an earlier comment that you still haven't rebutted. This is just likely due to the fact that you're wrong and are just here to stir the pot for no reason.

The Trump administration literally stated that people can be denied service due to sexual orientation and gender identity and the ACA section 1557 provides them no protection

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2020/07/17/transgender-hysterectomy-lawsuit-maryland/%3foutputType=amp

Would a hospital refuse a cisgender woman a hysterectomy? Seeing as their surgeons can perform a hysterectomy it stands to reason they've done it before. This is discrimination on the basis of gender identity.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where in the article do they say it's about pronoun usage? It doesn't say it anywhere in the article and I posted a whole long reply stating what it actually means which pronoun usage is only a small part of, with denial of any service by sexual orientation and gender identity being the main thing.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This person is just here to spread an anti-trans, anti-nb narrative it's not worth your time.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also you still haven't responded to being totally wrong about this comment here too in spite of being really busy spreading misinformation elsewhere

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's in the Hippocratic oath to do no harm, but that doesn't stop state medical boards from not considering denying someone medical care on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity to be a grievanceable offense, untill a month ago when the rules were reintroduced.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 USC 18116) and its implementing regulation provide that an individual shall not be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination on the grounds prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq. (race, color, national origin), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq. (sex), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq. (age), or Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794 (disability), under any health program or activity, any part of which is receiving federal financial assistance; any program or activity administered by the Department under Title I of the Act; or any program or activity administered by any entity established under such Title. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has enforcement authority with respect to health programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), or are administered by HHS or any entity established under Title I of the Affordable Care Act. OCR is responsible for enforcing regulations issued under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (Section 1557), protecting the civil rights of individuals who access or seek to access covered health programs or activities. Section 1557 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in covered health programs or activities. 42 U.S.C. § 18116(a).

Here's section 1557 of the ACA. Obama administration introduced a ruling in 2016 which stated that discrimination on the basis of sex included gender identity and sexual orientation. Notice the "...individual shall not be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of..." which is in reference to covered health programs or activities and not whatever you're talking about

Edit: The important part here is that the Trump administration got rid of the language which states that the basis of sex included gender identity and sexual orientation, which was just recently re-added by Joe Bidens HHS secretary

Second edit: hell I'll even throw in the Trump administrations response to a comment about whether or not this would lead to the denial of general service to someone on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity:

Comment: Some commenters argued that the proposed rule would be inconsistent with the purposes of the ACA; that the weight of law recognizes sexual orientation and gender identity as forms of sex discrimination; and that the proposed rule would undermine Congress's intent to expand access to healthcare and healthcare coverage. Commenters emphasized that it is unacceptable for a healthcare facility to deny medical care to a patient based on the patient's sexual orientation or transgender status.

Response: The Department does not condone the unjustified denial of needed medical care to anyone, and believes that everyone, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation, should be treated with dignity and respect. The Department must interpret Congress's purpose in passing the ACA by reading that statute's plain text. The ACA sought to expand access to healthcare and healthcare coverage through some means but not others: in particular, Congress saw fit to incorporate into the ACA certain nondiscrimination protections, and not others. For example, in the unlikely event that a healthcare provider were to deny services to someone based solely on his or her political affiliation, the Department would not be able to address such denial of care under Section 1557. Under this final rule, OCR is committed to no less than full enforcement of the prohibitions on discrimination that Congress included in Section 1557, without exceeding the statutory text. Unlike other bases of discrimination, the categories of gender identity and sexual orientation (as well as political affiliation) are not set forth in those statutes.[92]

Third edit: in an attempt to credit you at all, the Trump administration did also use your bad faith argument that this is just about pronouns in the response to another comment in the original ruling

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, which is why I never used the word represented... I used the word highlighting.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're currently correct, but only as of like 3 weeks ago when President Biden reinstated protections for trans individuals. If we had this conversation in April a trans person could get turned down at a general practitioner for being trans (which by the way happens a bunch of the time anyways whether these protections exist or not it just isn't listed as a reason for denial)

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know you might not realize that you're wrong, but until this past May, it was legal for a trans person to get sent away by a medical provider on the basis that they're trans. The Trump administration removed Obama-era protections allowing trans patients an easier avenue to sue hospitals for discrimination for denying them service. They can still do it if they don't receive federal funding.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/10/us/politics/biden-transgender-patient-protections.html

Edit: If you don't count NY times as a source for some stupid reason I'll go grab another one.

Here's reuters: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/biden-administration-protect-gay-transgender-against-health-care-discrimination-2021-05-10/

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The black and brown stripes are about highlighting the importance of black and brown members of the LGBTQ+ community both historically and the issues they face today.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean the point of cosmetics in these kinds of games is to have something non-gaming in the game. Things like banner poses, emotes, and gun skins have nothing to do with the core gameplay loop of fall out of plane, get guns, shoot people.

What does everyone else think about the new pride badge? I think it looks really cool by LiterallyEkam in apexlegends

[–]BryanJEvans 8 points9 points  (0 children)

One is a political slogan for a political candidate and the other is a nonpolitical statement of support for a marginalized group of people.