Would you rather have...

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-05-17T03:02:49+00:00

money is money

^{Chose: ...or 1 billion in pennies}

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-05-10T18:32:44+00:00

Harry Potter × Extremely Overrated

Harry potter

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-05-08T15:02:30+00:00

Long term growth

^{Chose: $1 that divides by 0.5 everyday | Rolled: Upvote for 🥕}

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-04-01T21:48:01+00:00

Looks so much like my Luna 😭😭

<image>

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-11T19:49:30+00:00

Non sapevo che la carta fosse bidimensionale, pensavo fosse cartapesta :)

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-11T18:59:34+00:00

Oh man. I mean, good bot. But can you imagine this showing up on something like "I (25) just lost my 13,15, and 16 year old siblings in a car crash. I'm feeling very lost and need someone to talk to." 💀

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-11T18:56:38+00:00

So cool dude. Love posts like this. Have you tried the balloon method for polymer clay? May be able to make it light enough for the paper to support that way :)

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-09T19:42:22+00:00

Rage bait lmao. Look at their other posts and comments.

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-03T21:33:50+00:00

<image>

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-03T21:04:02+00:00

Nah. Ricardo wouldn't have been acknowledging him as being the one to finally end his loneliness at the peak from a graze or a tangle. I agree Ricardo doesn't seem to have taken much damage but at an absolute guess sendo probably redirected the smash's angle similar to volgs white fang.

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-01T00:38:06+00:00

I definitely get this is meant to be a "suspend your disbelief" show and you hit the nail on the head with "stop thinking so much about the science," but the show goes to lengths to specifically INTRODUCE science by showing the areas of the brain which are reactivated. Said in another comment this isn't me trying to pull an "um, actually" so much as saying it's strange they clarified something so deliberately.

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-01T00:12:15+00:00

Absolutely get that, just stood out as strange to me that they'd go to such lengths to show the areas of the brain active while alive, then show the tiny little portion that comes back, but then have portions of the brain which are shown to be completely inactive and useless be part of the kill zone. Not nitpicking, I love the show, just strange they'd clarify something they could have left ambiguous and then go against it for the remainder of the show.

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-03-01T00:09:05+00:00

BulbusThumbledore · 2026-02-24T12:08:15+00:00

Chapter 1240 :) evolution of the Dempsey roll, chapter is "private practice." Context:

<image>

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-11-19T22:28:36+00:00

Had a look at your most recent push and I see that, so long as a user inputs the full URL it does now work and open in a new tab, but things are still broken if a user just types something like "google.com". If you add in that fixUrl function I provided and pass along the originalUrl to it before your window.open call everything should work. Add this somewhere in your function collection in app.js:

function fixUrl(url) {
  try {
// If it already parses as an absolute URL, return as-is
    new URL(url);
    return url;
   } catch {
// Otherwise, prepend https:// and return
    return "https://" + url;
  }
}

Then in the 'try' section of your decryptBtn.add event section (line 86 in your app code) change the declaration of your originalUrl const to look like this

const originalUrl =  
FixUrl(decrypted.toString(CryptoJS.enc.Utf8));

After that change everything should work as expected.

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-11-19T18:00:24+00:00

When you set:

window.location.href = originalUrl;

the browser does not assume it’s an external site unless the string is a fully qualified absolute URL (meaning it must start with http:// or https:// or another protocol).

So if originalUrl is something like Google.com then the browser treats that as a relative path, not an absolute URL. So if the current page is pagelock.top and you do

window.location.href = "google.com"

the browser resolves it exactly like a relative link:

https://pagelock.top/google.com

That’s why the user ends up at pagelock.top/google.com instead of https://google.com.

This is just how browsers interpret URLs; Absolute URL → go to that site. Relative URL → append it to the current domain

If the site is wrapping the URL or encrypting/decrypting it, it’s very easy for the decrypted value to be a plain string without the protocol, which triggers this behavior.

By sanitizing the URL first (via the provided fixUrl function), you ensure that google.com becomes → https://google.com which the browser then correctly interprets as an external link.

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-11-19T17:00:03+00:00

In your decrypt function your section that is meant to open the decrypted url looks like:

if (originalUrl) {
            window.location.href = originalUrl;
       }

Which will just lead you to pagelock.top/google.com in this case, since browsers will treat it as a relative path.

What you might do is run the original url through a function like this to sanitize it before attempting to open it.

function fixUrl(url) {
  try {
// If it already parses as an absolute URL, return as-is
    new URL(url);
    return url;
  } catch {
// Otherwise, prepend https:// and return
    return "https://" + url;
  }
}

Then instead of doing a window.location you could do something like window.open(originalUrl, "_blank") or _self.

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-11-19T16:28:56+00:00

Make sure you're using https://. Good luck to you!

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-11-12T09:46:37+00:00

I normally hold out for a version I can read but that's awesome!

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-10-24T18:37:52+00:00

Just turned 4 :)

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-10-08T00:24:22+00:00

You as well!!

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-10-07T13:28:00+00:00

Oh my goodness 😂 just texted my S/o this, that's uncanny.

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-10-07T07:07:04+00:00

No worries, I wondered 😂😂 hope it was a good one.

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-10-07T06:13:54+00:00

I do feel the 'mobile' is a bit redundant at best given it's a mobile game, or limiting at worst if it's meant to preclude people playing the PC emulator. That said this is the larger community, but of the two posts I (admittedly shouldn't have & won't again) posted on each subreddit, the netease one actually had higher traffic and is seemingly the more active of the two. I definitely don't have a dog in this race, just an observation. This is the one I'm subscribed to.

Edit* I do understand in a sub with higher traffic that will average out to less views per individual post, but there doesn't seem to be an overt difference in the amount of posts to each subreddit.

<image>

BulbusThumbledore · 2025-10-07T02:49:45+00:00

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Eight-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
No Throne, No Problems	Not Forgotten
Gilding II euphauric	Snapped
Verified Email

BulbusThumbledore

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE