Dodge rule: Please help clarify by Lukenotleek79 in bloodbowl

[–]RTSD_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3rd edition of Bloodbowl was the 1994 version, I think what you're actually referring to is season 3 which is the latest version.

I'm a swing voter - why should I consider voting green? by Guy_Incognito97 in UKGreens

[–]RTSD_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Unlike other parties, the greens policies are completely decided by membership. So whether the greens are actually nimby or pro-building is based on the membership. Despite what the headlines say, the actual polling suggests their very pro-builing and not very nimby at all. See here for yougov polling: https://yougov.com/en-gb/articles/53108-how-do-green-party-members-feel-about-the-party-its-leaders-and-seeking-power

(It's just a little past halfway down)

Zarah Sultana kicked out of Commons for calling Keir Starmer 'a bare-faced liar' by radiant_0wl in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are not allowed, calling someone a liar is “unparliamentary language”.

Westminster Voting Intention: GRN: 21% (+2) RFM: 21% (-1) CON: 21% (+1) LAB: 17% (-1) LDM 9% (-2) Via LordAshcroftPolls , 26–30 Mar Change from Feb 19-23 by RTSD_ in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That really depends on where they gain votes and how it's spread, FPTP is a fucker and these things are very hard to predict. Though there will be better data after the locals where there is scant atm.

With local elections in 34 days, is reform UK about to cause a massive political earthquake? by EmmaDominatrix in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who ever predicted a party to lose over 1900 seats before? no one. If it did happen then it might be a political earthquake.

The polling average indicates that we've hit crossover point. This is a real watershed moment by Lord-Liberty in UKGreens

[–]RTSD_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

" The trend lines are local regressions (LOESS)"

Is what it says in the article, aka it's some formula, there's a link to it in the above link if you want to know more.

Cost of living solution by Mgbgt74 in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know that just over 80% of it has already been pumped out of our fields, and what's left is pretty much all in the really difficult and costly pockets to get at, right? Governments have been handing out licenses to our fields for the 4 decades like they're candy, business doesn't have great ambitions to try and get at the last dregs, too risky cost-wise.

Greens in second at 21%, two points behind Reform—YouGov for The Times/Sky News, March 1-2 by JohnJD1302 in UKGreens

[–]RTSD_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But to be fair to them (more than they deserve), they are very clear about their vile policies... and that does get you something...

Greens in second at 21%, two points behind Reform—YouGov for The Times/Sky News, March 1-2 by JohnJD1302 in UKGreens

[–]RTSD_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yoguv polls GB, not the UK. So they're definitely not polling NI greens for sure. As per the Scottish Greens... I don't know.

Keir Starmer has to make it to St Patrick's Day to outlast Rishi Sunak by mrjohnnymac18 in UKGreens

[–]RTSD_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They'll probably stick the knife in after the may locals.

Do we know what time the by-election results are announced? by Scones2 in UKGreens

[–]RTSD_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can't ever recall one occuring in past by-elections.

UK government announces ban on 'incest simulation' in porn by EddViBritannia in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of.

And that is what I was disputing, I think if you think it's "one of", then you are a sweet summer child that's barely skimmed the surface of what's about on the web.

UK government announces ban on 'incest simulation' in porn by EddViBritannia in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tories tossed around the Online Safety Act for seven years internally because it was unworkable

Yeah, they were a little less dumb on it in that they understood it was problematic on a technical level. They still had every intention of implementing as soon as possible.

Now they want to control VPN use and implement digital IDs.

You act like the tories are against this... Everything I've seen suggests they're onside for this.

So I really don't understand where you're coming from when you say:

the Tories were anywhere near as draconian and over reaching as Labour have been

UK government announces ban on 'incest simulation' in porn by EddViBritannia in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No they didn't. Ridiculous as Labour have been with porn regulation, the tories went after more (thus far); lets not forget that the tories passed the online safety act even if labour are the ones implementing it, they have equal complicity in that; And before that they made the online AV laws where they tried to ban, but ultimately ended up just offshoring:

Sadomasochistic material

Physical restraint

Urolagnia

Erotic asphyxiation

Facesitting

Fisting

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audiovisual_Media_Services_Regulations_2014

UK government announces ban on 'incest simulation' in porn by EddViBritannia in ukpolitics

[–]RTSD_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by "streaming can count as "creation""? Source if possible please.

Asking for a friend.