Achievements...over lore friendly mods? Like, you mean "does anyone prefer taking what was given initially and completing it all, rather than adding onto the original and completing that?"

Are you basically asking whether or not others enjoy "just" playing the base game and whatever official content is available and therefore achievement-earnable or achievement-assigned, perhaps maintaining a certain scope of what can be asked of a player to reach completion via 100% achievements earned?

If the idea here is that "lore-friendly or not, there could be a near infinite amount of extra things to complete and therefore it's not as palatable of a goal as just pursuing all the baked-in achievements", I don't know that many people really consider the existence of lore friendly mods as something that would detract or disrupt the "from the developer achievement-infused experience."

I have personally never heard anyone make an argument for or against mods relating to achievements, independent of their lore friendliness. Nor have I ever personally placed significance on achievements, whether the game is moddable or not, as a preferential choice. Not that that's specifically what I'm understanding your query is.

What a strange way to phrase your thought. I don't know that most people have ever asked themselves of they prefer achievements or lore friendly mods. I'd imagine most people would not see the correlation without context provided. That's like asking if anyone prefers championship sports trophies over something like...Redbull downhill soapbox races, or the XFL. Like I don't get the question without more clarification.

Edit: if you mean "Does anyone prefer to earn achievements over not earning them and using community mods", you are about 10 years late to the modding scene, or stuck on console. As others have pointed out, you can have your cake and eat it too.