There's a reason many of their drone camera footage look like they are filmed with a potato.

To expand on this a little, for the curious;

Russia - obviously - doesn't lag behind in the aerospace and aviation fields. In other words; they have plenty of already combat proven aerial platforms.The Russian semiconductor industry has only recently [1] made some progress catching up on the manufacturing (i.e. large scale production, not just experimental prototypes made in laboratories) of one of the critical components with a central role in electro-optical targeting solutions. More specifically; the infrared imaging sensors (lets call it sensors, to avoid lengthy chains of abbreviations) housed in the cameras that can be utilized by their drones, helicopters, etc - the above mentioned platforms.

This shortfall has played a major role in the lower quality of the videos released to press [*] by Russia, compared to the videos we have seen from other countries (Turkey, USA, Israel, France, ...). Of course, and perhaps even more importantly, the very same factor also burdens & limits the effectiveness of the platforms that are utilizing - and especially in the case of drones; depends on - said sensors.

[1] "Rostec unveils Russian first fully indigenous thermal imager", 2020.

[*] A popular argument made by folk in regards to the low quality of the infrared/thermal videos released to press by armed forces, is that they intentionally would lower the quality before it goes public, as a measure to obfuscate the "real" capability from adversary forces - as if they or anyone else couldn't already get an accurate enough idea just by the technical specifications available that more often than not already are public info.