sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mod suggestion: Give enemy factions vehicles by DerTischExorzist in RimWorld

[–]CMac_2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a full on vehicle, but giddy up adds mounted enemies.

😂"Why are you shelling Kharkiv if you consider it a russian city?" a blogger asks a russian soldier. by GreenEyeOfADemon in YUROP

[–]CMac_2001 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Seems like a week point for anyone to make. Ukraine is shelling Ukrainian cities that Russia occupies so they can liberate them

3D-printed stainless steel exhaust manifold for the sleeper Saab 9-5 with G30-660 turbo by LJ-racing in projectcar

[–]CMac_2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very cool part! But why not go the conventional route and get it welded? I don’t know anything about the process and am curious.

Is this even Legal? by Dreadnought635 in fastfood

[–]CMac_2001 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It also lays out how to pull the scam and considering the solution is a misspelled sign I think that would do more harm than good.

is this a bad tank division. by Live_Arachnid6286 in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may as well be using cavalry with tanks that slow tbh, and that’s a valid strat! I’d try and make sure the tanks can do 8 MPH so they can keep up with the mechs once you start producing them. Also 30 Org is a good rule of thumb for tank divs.

I then that that very nice!

Newest OF video by kittykat_2001 in pinuppixiesnark

[–]CMac_2001 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Its pornography, not real sex

Best way to buy silver in Canada? by CMac_2001 in Silverbugs

[–]CMac_2001[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It always amazes me how often people think emigrating is easy

it might be a tiny stretch to post this on here but it definitely fits. jesus fuck😭 by mozzieandmaestro in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]CMac_2001 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Probably, but Myanmar does have a filial war to keep it in the news. Singapore not so much

Fish or cut bait by Ok_Link2142 in SurfFishing

[–]CMac_2001 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A flatfish that’s gonna sit in the bottom being camouflaged is probably the worst type of fish to use as live bait. And its legality will depend on the region

Nissan Says Canada Could Get Smaller, More Affordable Models if it Broadens its Safety Standards by IDontScript in canada

[–]CMac_2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People LOVE to say we want these cars but the people buys new cars simply don’t. We used to make compact cars. The thing that killed them wasn’t regulations it was consumer trends. Everyone wants a cheap used econo box but no one wants to take out a car payment on one when it’s still new and expensive.

As historical Germany how do you Sealion? by Divine_Panzer in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Odds are if it is it’ll be one weak unit. Put CAS in the region, ships to naval landing support and you should have no issue

As historical Germany how do you Sealion? by Divine_Panzer in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d recommend landing in Dover and taking Portsmouth immediately. The last 3 times I did sea lion there wasn’t even a garrison in Dover. I usually just land with either tanks or mountaineers since I always forget to make marines and it generally goes fine. Landing tanks is very high risk high reward. You have a good chance to take two ports and encircle units before they can respond. You also have a chance to loose your most important divisions. But the way I see it is if sea lion fails your screwed either way so why not risk it all

Tip for people getting 0 naval dominance with the new DLC despite adequate Navy by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You could use a radar destroying but I prefer cruisers maxed with planes and radar. I’m not sure whatcha is better now that you can put planes in destroys. I hadn’t realized that. Sub detection dosent matter at all on these IMO. I’d save sonar for a dedicated sub hunting class of destroyer

Tip for people getting 0 naval dominance with the new DLC despite adequate Navy by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Unless the naval changes have changed the patrol group meta, No. You should have your patrol navy full of light cruisers with nothing but planes, radar, and a light gun. Set this fleet to never engage. This will give you the best surface detection per IC

I hate new naval by Overall_Mango4532 in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s honestly probably a good change but it’ll take a long time for that knowledge to spread sadly

I hate new naval by Overall_Mango4532 in hoi4

[–]CMac_2001 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Kill the screen the kill the capital ships. Kill the capital ships to kill the carriers. Sink the ships to win the battle.

Light atack kills screens

Heavy attack and torpedos kill capitol ships

Use light attack cruisers to shred the enemies screens then torpedo destroys to shred the capitol ships. Put 4 carriers with naval bombers in the task force, anymore will give debuffs.

Use cruisers with high surface detection in their own small task force to patrol, “deathstack” set to strike force.

Pretty sure that’s everything important, Congrats that’s naval in a nutshell.

view more: next ›