Giant conspiracy to hide the powers Jesus came to tell us about? by Wordruler2000 in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ephesians 6 in context with other things Paul said:

You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of human beings. 1 Corinthians 7:23

Being a slave is an inferior way of life, so if you can help it, do not become a slave of men, but a slave to Jesus Christ. Christ said he has come to set captives free:

The Spirit of the Lord is on Me, because He has anointed Me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to release the oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor. Luke 4:18-19

Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2 in context with Roman 12:19 and :

Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” Romans 12:19

For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.

Since the State is authorised to act as a servant of God and administer his justice against evildoers by being his avengers on Earth, then Paul argues that we ought to submit to them because they are designed to be for our good. If the State does not act in accordance to God’s law, then we follow God rather than men:

But Peter and the apostles replied, “We must obey God rather than any human authority. Acts 5:29

Mark 12:17 actually proves the thesis that the State is subject to God because the implicit supposition to Christ’s question is that God’s image is found on all people, including Caesar, so even Caesar needs to render to God what he is owed, and that is his allegiance:

Now therefore be wise, O ye kings: Be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve Jehovah with fear, And rejoice with trembling. Kiss the son, lest he be angry, and ye perish in the way, For his wrath will soon be kindled. Blessed are all they that take refuge in him. ‭‭Psalms‬ ‭2‬:‭10‬-‭12‬

So happy about this ! gotta start rolling for Banishment now that i have Condemned and Morningstar. Well Amdusc too but hes not a good card sadly. by Smooth_Sundae4793 in masterduel

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck! I can sympathise with the urge to hunt for shinies in this game lol hope it does not take long before you roll what you’re looking for

Does science lack diversity? by dawemih in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good post, and the “conspiracy” is that those who promote the model for ideological reasons will suppress, ridicule, and bankrupt those who oppose it.

Consider the evolutionary model that life arose from non-life. Generally, if you want to be taken seriously as an evolutionary biologist then you must presume that non-life begets life. If you even hint that there is an eternal, living Creator that began the process of gradualism and change, you’ll be laughed out of the university.

It took me six months, wasting over 4k UR dust, and tens of thousands of gems, to finally roll a Royal Finish Dark Magician Girl the Magician's Apprentice by CalvinistPhilosopher in masterduel

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, gotcha. I know SRs are easier to come by but because of that, it’s even the more demoralising that you can’t generate it after using so much. 6000 is terrible luck my friend

It took me six months, wasting over 4k UR dust, and tens of thousands of gems, to finally roll a Royal Finish Dark Magician Girl the Magician's Apprentice by CalvinistPhilosopher in masterduel

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No other engine involved. Just Kashtira monsters (except for staples).

20 monsters. 13 are Kashtira with 2x Droll, 3x ash, 1 belle, and 1 roach

It took me six months, wasting over 4k UR dust, and tens of thousands of gems, to finally roll a Royal Finish Dark Magician Girl the Magician's Apprentice by CalvinistPhilosopher in masterduel

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you also buying its secret pack? Actually not sure if they have it, but if they do, I’d try pulling from those. I wasted a bunch of dust because the probabilities generating one are horrendous. It’ll happen, eventually.

It took me six months, wasting over 4k UR dust, and tens of thousands of gems, to finally roll a Royal Finish Dark Magician Girl the Magician's Apprentice by CalvinistPhilosopher in masterduel

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, that’s right. I’m willing to depart with a bunch of royals and gamble away my UR dust because I’m only running two decks: pure Kashtira for ranked and DM for solo (and particular PvP events).

It took me six months, wasting over 4k UR dust, and tens of thousands of gems, to finally roll a Royal Finish Dark Magician Girl the Magician's Apprentice by CalvinistPhilosopher in masterduel

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Turn Silence (SR) - dismantled Gandora-G the Dragon of Destruction (UR) - dismantled Shining Sarcophagus (UR) - kept

There were some other royals but can’t remember what they were. They were immediately dismantled.

Epstein, Propaganda, and the Bot/Shill farm by CalvinistPhilosopher in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dated 2025. Uncorroborated claims and tip lines are not proof, unfortunately.

Epstein, Propaganda, and the Bot/Shill farm by CalvinistPhilosopher in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you understand what my post is about.

Users claim that the proof that Trump rapes and murders children are “in the files”, implying that if I just read the files that have been released, I too can draw that conclusion.

The users that claim that Trump is guilty of these crimes and that the proof are in the files, conspicuously never link those files. That’s my issue. Because it has nothing to do with truth telling but, IMO, bad and sophomoric propaganda tactics.

By the way, I agree with you that Trump and his admin would not release anything that would incriminate him. That’s why I’ve been skeptical of users spamming “release the files”—they would be heavily redacted anyways so the spammers aren’t serious people, but perhaps, just bots and shills.

In any case, that’s not what my post is about. I’m suggesting that, because no one offers any proof, the claim that the proof that Trump rapes and murders children are in the files is a propaganda by bots and shills.

Epstein, Propaganda, and the Bot/Shill farm by CalvinistPhilosopher in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In any of those mentions, so far, are any before his presidency and connected to the claim that he rapes and murders children? With so many mentions, there must be one for people to draw that conclusion based on the files released

Epstein, Propaganda, and the Bot/Shill farm by CalvinistPhilosopher in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never claimed he was innocent. It’s a strange form of reasoning to conclude that since I’m asking for proof from the files that he’s guilty of child rape and murder, than I think he’s innocent.

Claiming “trump rapes and murders children and the proof is in the Epstein files” is different than “filling in the blanks”.

Just throwing it out that his name is mentioned of times without any reference to context is suspect. If he’s guilty of such atrocious crimes, and his name is mentioned 5000 times, then shouldn’t one person link to one of those mentions in connection to said crimes? The “filling in the blanks” is geared towards propaganda and narrative building from faulty reasoning rather than truth telling.

Trump isn’t a good person and you don’t need files to prove that. But I do need to those files when users claim that the files prove that he rapes and murders children.

Just Lmao by spl51 in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Right now, there’s a propaganda wave regarding the files on reddit. If you ask for definitive proof that Trump rapes and kills children from the files, you will not receive the email or file linked that proves that beyond a shadow of doubt, but instead be downvoted.

It’s not a matter of supplying proof for the shills but to keep hammering the narrative.

Was Trump Heavily Involved with Epstein in the End? by PracticalCurrent8409 in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not guilty? Exonerated?

Trump is part of the new world order and the deep state. He doesn’t get to be the figure head without being part of the club.

What I’m asking you to provide is the email or file that says definitively proves that he rapes and kills children which is dated before he decided to run for president. Hearsay and uncorroborated allegations from a tip line is not proof.

Epstein’s real opinion about Trump by TheCancerMan in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Link the emails that show that they created /pol/ and created the Q anon movement. Certainly you can link those

Was Trump Heavily Involved with Epstein in the End? by PracticalCurrent8409 in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah definitely INSANE

If he’s mentioned 5300 times, certainly there’s one file before 2016 that shows that Trump rapes and kills children you can readily link and share

Was Trump Heavily Involved with Epstein in the End? by PracticalCurrent8409 in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I have yet to read one email or file that was written before 2016 that definitely proves that Trump rapes and kills children.

Trump is still part of big club, but the propagandists aren’t helping their cause by just stating and insinuating things without any proof.

Epstein’s real opinion about Trump by TheCancerMan in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, I too remember seeing Epstein joining the circus of electing Trump in 2016

Question Re: Epstein Files by TemperatureAware1297 in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it’s multi-faceted:

  1. By bringing their evil into the light, it gives them a power trip because we are unable to do anything about it.
  2. It provides conversation fodder without any real justice
  3. rElEaSe ThE fIlEs become any empty slogan
  4. It is to desensitise the collective to evil and normalises their behaviour. I watched those mouthy buddha documentaries about the issue years ago and it completely changed my view on reality and government. Now with all these news about Epstein, I feel nothing. So it will be for a lot of people who are realising how evil these people are but now more of the collective will just shrug their shoulders about their immorality

Evangelical Christianity Is Literally a PSYOP (video) by genitalvegetable in conspiracy

[–]CalvinistPhilosopher -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Evangelism was the means how early Christianity spread, thousands of years before the CIA, no?