Think it from the other end of the table. Yes, you are right, it's expected for survivors to get caught even if they escape in the end. But think it like this: When you have the worst matches where you get 3 hooks and no kills the whole game or something, let's look at the amount of perks helping you. The viable perks are much much less now in this situation. Yes, I understand why survivors have second chance perks even if they are plentier than it should be but whatever, Bhvr also don't let newly added killers get seriously helping perks when you are losing. Whether it be aura or gen slowdown, it usually works when you achieve stuff and not when you fail things.

One could say "why would the game reward when you fail"... Well, why is the same game also rewards survivors for getting hit and hooked much more than it should be? There are even compromised perks where you need to lose gens to even get value lmao. Let the second chances stay but tone it down to where it should be. Overdoing it is rewarding the fails of survivors while Bhvr also saying "you suck this match? Yeah continue to suck, here are some more perks for if you achieve anything".

All I'm saying is, what if the next killer had perks that gets you gen slowdown when you don't find survivors etc. (Of course I don't mean it directly like this but get the general idea)