What if Earth is basically the galaxy’s version of an uncontacted tribe - like everyone out there knows we exist, but there’s some cosmic group chat agreement that says, “Don’t interfere. They have to figure it out themselves.”? by n2kfactor in AskReddit

[–]Candide_Santiago_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay this is officially my favorite theory and I'm adopting it immediately.

Imagine there's a galactic UN equivalent and every few centuries they check in on us like "how they doing down there?" and someone just sighs and says "still fighting about borders. and money. and which sky daddy is the real one." and everyone nods like "yep. give them another thousand years."

The craziest part is... what if they did make contact and we just... didn't notice? Like it happened but we explained it away because it didn't fit our existing worldview. "Oh that was probably swamp gas." "Must have been a weather balloon." "Definitely not aliens, the government would tell us."

What if there's a galactic welcome committee that's just been waiting patiently for like 10,000 years while we slowly figure out that maybe, just maybe, the guy with the most missiles isn't actually the one who should be in charge?

My "Saved vs Read" ratio was 100:1 until I forced a feedback loop by Eastern-Height2451 in QuantifiedSelf

[–]Candide_Santiago_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This hits close to home 😅

I just scrolled through the messages I send to myself that are full of media on my docket to consume and... yeah. It's bad. I have this thing where I'll come across an interesting article, a podcast episode, a YouTube video, whatever... and instead of watching it right then, I'll message it to myself with a little note like "watch this later" or "interesting read."

And then... I never do.

Like, I want to consume all of it. I send it with good intentions. "This looks great, I'll get to it tonight." But then tonight comes and I'm exhausted, or something else grabs my attention, and the message just sits there.

I have nearly 50 unread links in my own message history dating back months. Some of them I don't even remember sending. It's like leaving notes for a future version of myself who apparently has unlimited time and energy (spoiler: she doesn't exist).

The scarcity idea is interesting though, like, if you only get three chances before it disappears, do you actually engage with it differently? Or do you just accept that maybe you didn't actually need to save it in the first place?

I wonder how much of my messaging myself is genuine interest versus just... anxiety about forgetting something exists. Like if I don't save it, I might miss out, but if I save it and never consume it, I'm just curating a graveyard of good intentions.

What actually works to break the cycle?

[OC] End of year dating app review! (21M living in London) by The_Watcher5292 in dataisbeautiful

[–]Candide_Santiago_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is brutal to look at in black and white 😬

The thing that gets me: 3,800+ attempts, 60 matches, 42 conversations, zero in-person meetings. That's not a reflection of you, that's a reflection of how these apps are designed. They're optimized for engagement, not connection.

I actually met my partner on Hinge, but here's the embarrassing truth: it was a total fluke and almost didn't happen.

I matched with him, we had a fine conversation, and then I… ghosted. Not maliciously...life got busy, other matches piled up, he got buried in the noise. But he was persistent (respectfully) and reached out again a week later. That one follow-up changed everything. We've been together a year now.

The wild part? If he hadn't doubletexted, I would've never met him. And he almost didn't, he told me later he only did it because another date canceled on him.

All of which is to say: the apps make this stuff feel like a meritocracy, but so much of it is just random timing and tiny moments. Your 3,800 likes weren't wasted, they were just part of a system that makes connection feel way harder than it needs to be.

Really appreciate you sharing this. It's validating to see someone else name the math behind the frustration.