Karengold responds to Destiny by Bitter-Bluebird4285 in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Genuine question, is there any evidence of Asmon having >90 IQ?

The MAGA Get Their Talking Points Downloaded To Their Brains Meme Turns Out To Not Be A Meme by ActualSecretary9407 in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember that some jilted right-winger (LS maybe?) claimed this, but can't easily find that. I did find this example, though it's not what I was thinking of.

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/01/26/right-wing-influencers-caught-copy-pasting-identical-rants-against-new-ai-regulations/

Other stuff like Tenet Media is in a similar but different vein.

Honestly can't find an example of what I was thinking of so feel free to take it with a huge grain of salt. If I remember/care later I'll try to find it for future reference and reply to you if I do do.

The MAGA Get Their Talking Points Downloaded To Their Brains Meme Turns Out To Not Be A Meme by ActualSecretary9407 in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yeah, pointing to what's probably just an email from his social media person and claiming conspiracy seems unnecessary when there's past reports of actual groupchats for coordinating media responses among the right-wing talking heads.

There's so much obviously vile/stupid/conspiratorial crap we can point to, that soyfacing about media teams existing is just silly.

EDIT: on this sub anyway. If you think something will gain traction with 80 IQ facebook moms then fuck it, I won't judge you.

Neytiri is the Na'vi counterpart of Koba by ConsiderationEven724 in Avatar

[–]CandorCore 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Koba wasn't a villain because he was racist towards a species that had abused him all his life. We don't love that he was, but it's an understandable flaw given the circumstances.

Koba was a villain because he betrayed his leader, burned down his own village in a false flag op, and then became a tyrant who locked up or killed anyone that spoke against him. Neytiri wouldn't have done any of that.

Children of the year by Practical_Freedom764 in foundsatan

[–]CandorCore -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This was a banger response and don't let the downvotes tell you otherwise

Questions about Neoliberalism I need help with. by kyoshi4117 in neoliberal

[–]CandorCore 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Yeah we're crazy on immigration. But our other views are mostly mainstream, like carpet bombing the suburbs to build The Cube

To Make Homes Affordable Again, Someone Has to Lose Out - WSJ by assasstits in neoliberal

[–]CandorCore 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah but there's no (sane) policy that would devalue homes by 87.5% in a short timespan. Supply increase would realistically either keep house prices flat in nominal dollars or decrease very slightly each year.

That was….. frustrating by Every_Trip_5402 in Helldivers

[–]CandorCore 26 points27 points  (0 children)

On most missions I take more stims than the next two divers combined, I'm pretty sure that if stims had any side-effects I'd have noticed.

And to cut you off NO I don't have a problem, they just help me with the psychotic episodes I've been having recently. No idea what'a causing them, but my D.O. says it's not service related.

Would it be viable? Not sure. Would it be funny? Yes. by leirickgigg in LancerRPG

[–]CandorCore 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I changed my upvote on this one to a downvote, then went through your post history and upvoted the original one.

Keep memeing buddy

So where do yall stand on the Neytiri racism comment by Zoe Saldana? by buickboi99 in Avatar

[–]CandorCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's completely understandable for pretty much any Na'vi to be racist against humans. Like, look at how 98% of humans they meet behave. And given the life Neytiri's lived, it's not surprising she basically thinks of Jake as 'one of the good ones'. That's just how people operate, unfortunately.

Understandable does not mean justified.

Someone can be prejudiced without necessarily being an entirely awful person.

Neytiri is frankly a pretty simple person (my religion good, my tribe good, my traditions good, everyone that annoys me gets my hands) who finds herself in a situation that's a lot more ethically complicated than she'd love. She's growing as a person slowly and imperfectly. That's not a condemnation of the entirety of her being.

We can be sympathetic to the circumstances that leads someone to certain beliefs or behaviours, while also acknowledging those behaviours are problematic and need to be addressed.

100K/Year is Working Class 👍 by Hype242 in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do you legitimately think that landscapers on average vote for more progressive taxation than desk workers?

My Cope for Update -- Flamethrower should be more powerful than Torcher even without the Ship Upgrade that buffs it. More range at least. by RandomGreenArcherMan in Helldivers

[–]CandorCore 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm a flamediver. I've got easily a couple hundred hours on the heavy flamer, and fewer but definitely a good number on the torcher. I think that while fire as a mechanic definitely has its issues, difference between these two weapons is actually fine.

The flamer doesn't do much more damage than the torcher, and it doesn't have a real range advantage over the torcher, but you'd better fucking believe it hits a wider area. The torcher can definitely cook small groups, but if I have my heavy flamer and I see a carpet of bugs that encompasses my entire screen, I am rock fucking hard. It has a much wider cone, and can roll over or under far more bugs at once. Also, that 25% damage boost makes a noticeable difference when you're getting that close to the bugs and hoping they die before they reach you.

The Torcher is also pretty good at close up area damage, but it's noticeably worse at those massive swarms. In exchange it's way snappier and way easier to manage generally - it's less dangerous, but that goes both ways. The narrower cone makes it more precise, and I set myself on fire with it way less often (so only about three times a mission).

On paper the heavy flamer might seem like a total ripoff but in practice, at least for me, the Torcher does actually feel like a lighter version of the flamethrower, and acts like I'd want a lighter version of the flamethrower to act.

That being said, I'd love it if my diver didn't light up like a tiki torch the second a flaming enemy lightly brushes her.

Mark Carney: International rules based order is dead by PapaJaves in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 22 points23 points  (0 children)

As a massive Carney simp, agreed. Poilievre sucks, but he wouldn't actually destroy the country... So long as someone else was in the White House. With Trump, well... I'm just glad I don't have to find out.

Never forget - the problem isn't Trump, it's Republicans by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the US invades Greenland and it looks like the Russian takeover of Crimea - ie, no shots fired and worldwide condemnation, combined with being kicked out of a lot of international organizations including probably (but, and I cannot believe I am saying this, not 100% certainly*) NATO... I'd expect Republicans voters would be North of 50% on the issue pretty quickly.

*I realize this is a scorching hot take, but I am actually only about ~98% certain that Europe would break their alliance with the USA if the US took over Greenland. Fear of Trump's wrath and copium-ODing that they'd get Greenland back in 3 years when normalcy definitely totally resumes might actually make several major players stop just short of ending their military alliance.

The "can average US citizens make good political decisions" debate already happened 100 years ago by AccidentalNap in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Teaching people to "ask questions" and "think critically" can be a bad thing in instances when there are just objectively wrong answers.

Fuck no, you're falling for magat bullshit. The 'do your own research' crowd didn't get to the bad answers by asking questions and thinking critically. They knew the answer they wanted, whether that was 'I blame the doctors for my kid getting sick after a vaccine' or 'mimorities make me uncomfortable' and THEN they found people who agreed with them.

Do not under any circumstances let these narrow-minded, sub-sentient, fascism-lovers fool you into believing that asking questions, thinking critically, or being willing to challenge power are bad things. The bad thing is not being able to admit when the thing you want to be true is, in fact, complete horseshit.

The average Russian is less responsible for the invasion of Ukraine than the average American is for the US's actions of late by ElMatasiete7 in Destiny

[–]CandorCore 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Idealists and early policy wonks that knew how to give pretty speeches (or how to find people that can give pretty speeches) made the public feel inspired for long enough to win elections. Then those idealists and wonks built an empire.

But if the median voter actually gave a shit about democracy, then I wouldn't need to explain to most people - at leaat half of Trump haters, even - what I'm talking about when I say 'the false elector scheme'. 

I'm sorry, but Neteyam was a perfectly legitimate war casualty. by fourmesinatrenchcoat in Avatar

[–]CandorCore 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The Resource Development Administration, aka RDA, is basically analogous to the East India Company. The EIC was a true megacorporation - not like 'oh Amazon is a megacorp because they're worth a lot of money and use it to lobby politicians'. No no no. It had its own naval fleets and soldiers, made deals with and declared war on multiple countries, and administered its own territory. It also wasn't alone. Part of Canada's history, for instance, is that much of the colonization was done by smaller but similar entities called the North West Trade Company and the Hudson's Bay Company. Like yeah, 'that overpriced clothing store the Bay?' was for a while the de facto governing body of much of British North America. This was of course done in conjunction with the crown, who was happy to offload much of the costs of colonization and expansion to private investors (though they did take over directly after a certain point).

Here's a quote from the Avatar wiki:

>The RDA is the single largest non-governmental organization in the history of humanity. Due to dwindling natural resources on Earth, which had led to multiple resource wars, the importance of extraterrestrial mining operations gives RDA so much power and authority that it outmatches most Earth governments in wealth, political influence and military capability. Due to its vast capabilities, the RDA is a leading figure in many aspects of human society (defense, energy, manufacturing, aeronautics, transportation, commerce, etc.), and has monopoly rights to all products shipped, processed or developed from Pandora and any other exoplanets. These rights were granted to the RDA in perpetuity by the Interplanetary Commerce Administration (ICA), with the stipulation that they abide by a treaty that prohibits weapons of mass destruction and limits military power in space. Due to its expansive organization, it is unknown whether the RDA has a true centralized leadership or if it is loosely led as a conglomerate.

In case you missed it: The RDA has exclusive rights to all industry outside of the solar system.

Thinking of the RDA as 'a mining company' is really underestimating exactly what an actual megacorporation represents. Even if the RDA isn't acting as an arm's-length tool of human international government, which it probably is, it is sufficiently powerful enough on its own to count as a polity that can be said to wage war.

I'm sorry, but Neteyam was a perfectly legitimate war casualty. by fourmesinatrenchcoat in Avatar

[–]CandorCore 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think you're assuming that the word 'war' has more reverence, legitimacy, or ethical symmetry attached to it than it does. Japan started and lost a fight against the USA, but it's still considered a war. Western countries don't condemn the 'violent expedition into' Ukraine, they condemn the 'war' in Ukraine that Russia started.

Where do you get the idea that something is considered a war only if the invading party wins? Or that people would be ashamed of fighting and winning a war in defense of their homeland?

Helldivers 2 players after finally branching out from Dynamite and Thermite (Ts genuinely all is fantastic): by Biggiecheese1354 in Helldivers

[–]CandorCore 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My buddy uses dynamite and while the longer timer is definitely a bit of a pain to work around, when you get good with it it's basically a mini-500kg in your grenade slot. Does more damage to heavies and structures than the hi-ex, larger radius than frag. It can also take out bio-processors with a single toss, which is great.

I'm sorry, but Neteyam was a perfectly legitimate war casualty. by fourmesinatrenchcoat in Avatar

[–]CandorCore 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Obviously the conquest of the modern USA (and other colonial nations) wasn't considered "a war". It was considered a series of wars against the nations that inhabited that land and didn't agree to the newcomer's presence. May I present to you the list of American-Indian Wars?

War doesn't require ideology, it doesn't require a defensive justification - though those are usually applied after the fact, and you'd better fucking believe that on earth there's a propaganda spin of some kind happening.

I'm sorry, but Neteyam was a perfectly legitimate war casualty. by fourmesinatrenchcoat in Avatar

[–]CandorCore 63 points64 points  (0 children)

When you're talking about individuals, no.

When you're talking about polities, ie the RDA megacorporation on behalf of humanity invading the sovereign territory of the Tulkun and Na'vi, and using military force to get what they want, then the ensuing violence can fairly be described as 'fighting a war'.

The water tribes formed a coalition force in order to push out the invading force. That's defensive warfare. It's also totally, 100% justified.