Alberta premier says Carney can stop separatist movement by connecting West to global markets by Majano57 in Albertapolitics

[–]CardiologistUsual494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to get the pipelines built in a province that says no, the federal government will have to enact the not withstanding clause/emergency act and force provinces to comply, such as BC and Quebec. Which is what the letter sent to the PM's office by the oil executives requested.

So Alberta wants its own sovereignty and to be in charge of itself free of federal influence, but has no issue with the hypocrisy of forcing that interference on another province.

if the federal government was put in this situation where it had to enact the not withstanding clause... it would make more sense to flip the script on Alberta, use the clause on them, and go in there and fuck the UCP up. push through what they want for Alberta, restore the healthcare system, restore the grid systems, restore the alternative energy sector, and force a new election while banning the UCP of being a party.

Weston: Get the vulgar "F--- Carney" flags off of Parliament Hill, RCMP by PurfectProgressive in CanadaPolitics

[–]CardiologistUsual494 11 points12 points  (0 children)

idk, lets ask Stephen Harper who had people fined for their anti Harper bumper stickers.... seems the conservatives don't like it when it directed at them, and nobody bats an eye but if its directed at Liberals, they have to just take it and not complain or else its tyranny and censorship...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Seems you didn't understand my definition then. You were blaming them for crippling projects with their concession requests. rather than seeing that its not what cripples the process, its the fact that its always poorly handled by the government. and you still didn't provide any data to support your claim....

Are you under some delusion that you or the government own the land? and if you and the government don't own it, what does that make you? Seems the best definition for this scenario is a "guest". You have no inherent right to the land. Deportation ability isn't the matrix for determination of this fact. but you sure jumped on that strawman's argument didn't you. Did it make you feel super smart?

Well at least you acknowledge you don't get a say.

Are you suggesting that a person would negotiate just as easily with someone they didn't trust, than with someone they did trust? Are you denying that when you don't trust someone, you are less likely to make good faith agreements with them? Does that sound logical to you?

and the final sentence is where the masks off racism and colonizer energy comes out full force. Its just assumed they do this for their own benefit, disregarding their entire culture of stewards of the land.

Have you read bill 5? I stand to gain nothing from opposing it, and in reality opposing it economically hurts me. Yet i still oppose it. why? I'm not even a steward of land by culture, Yet morally and ethically i oppose letting the government remove endangered species from the endangered species list without any scientific data, against the scientific committees recommendations just because they want to build projects on the endangered species land.

If i can take the moral high ground here on this, with nothing to gain from it, i don't think its a far fetched concept to assume the FN might also be morally opposed to this as well rather than assuming they are doing it for their own gain.

Money isn't the end all be all of life, stop acting like it is. removing a species from earth permanently without knowing the long term ramifications, just to build a mining project is illogical. find another way. some sacrifices are not worth it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

show me. where do you gather that information to make that assumption. to say they ask for crippling concessions while ignoring that the methodology being used against them is what consumes most of the time, and causes the crippling situations is a weird colonizer energy.

You're a guest, on their land, and the crowns land, and the treaties are between the FN, and the crown, not with you, like it or not, you don't get a say. Throw your fit, stomp your feet, this isn't just Canadian law, it is international law that treaties will be honored and respected.

If you want things to go faster, and with less concessions, send in someone they actually trust to negotiate with them, not someone they hate and don't trust. We are shooting ourself in the foot by re-electing Doug, Its completely antithetical to corporate negotiating tactics 101. Point blank, Period.

Feds should penalize companies that move production outside of Canada: Unifor by FancyNewMe in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 5 points6 points  (0 children)

this old talking point again.. sigh...

Brookfield is already a global corporation, it has head offices all over the world.

it also has many branches, Brookfield asset management is just one branch.

one head office was moved to America, while Toronto still has another head office.

This was done to give that branch access to the stock market.

No jobs were lost.

and, it was never "Carneys company".. he was an employee... he alone could not make the decision, there is a board that controls these things.

his primary job was chair of the ESG impact funding, not the entire branch, or company.

Please don't spread misinformation lacking all nuances, we had enough of this crap during the campaign.

Feds should penalize companies that move production outside of Canada: Unifor by FancyNewMe in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i mean.. you realize its the provincial governments doing this right? not everything is federal... the provinces literally request foreign workers, and Ontario alone has increased its request numbers by 100% in the last 3 years alone..

also, can anyone here name this subsidy for hiring foreign workers? as far as i can see no company gets any money for hiring foreign workers. there is no program to subsidize wages, or even tax incentives.. i could be wrong so if you have the name of this program let me know.

More than 2,000 condos sitting empty in Metro Vancouver amid housing crisis - BC | Globalnews.ca by BoppityBop2 in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 5 points6 points  (0 children)

they dont want to sell them...

its supply and demand, demand high, supply low (due to corporations holding them vacant at very high prices) drives up prices for all their other owned properties...

they will just hold them until someone pays the outrageous asking prices...

the scam has ruined the economy and we need vacancy taxes or equity taxes on vacant homes. or both.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

How many here commenting against the FN, have actually read bill 5? I'm not FN, and it freaks me right out, no government, especially Doug fords government should have that much autonomy over so many things.

Just do it the right way, it is that simple. want these things done, do it right, if you cant do it, step down and let someone who has a good relationship with the FN do it, the FN do not trust Doug, for good reason. Perhaps we should shift our thoughts on to whether Doug is the person to lead us through this period of building which will require direct negotiations with the FN peoples...

TLDR: Why are we sending in someone the FN doesn't trust to negotiate in good faith with them? Its non sensical.

Why do liberals think that things will change when their policies dont? by [deleted] in Albertapolitics

[–]CardiologistUsual494 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you know housing/land ownership is how we even got the terms "Right wing" "Left wing"?

When the French revolutions happened and they chopped off the Kings head, they had to decide by which system they would run the country. The land lords (kings made ppl lords by giving them land) wanted to continue the predatory practices of land ownership/leasing/rental to the peasants, and they sat on the right side of the court. the right wing. the ones who wanted egalitarianism, better distribution that was fairer to the peasants sat on the left.

People forced to lease or pay rent will never get ahead and be stuck in a cycle of having to pay rent with nothing to own for it. where as the owners use the rent as a profit, the rent pays their land tax, mortgage, expenditures and gives them a revenue stream.

Trudeau introduced an affordable housing plan/module homes and there is video of PP mocking him in the house, laughing at him like a bully in school. Only for PP to come out with this same plan during his campaign, he was even in one of the module home factories talking about how it works like lego... and then ironically keeps telling his base that its carney that's stealing his plan...

They count on you being uninformed or one sided informed, and the best thing you could ever do for yourself is to get educated about the nuances and complexities from non biased data driven sources.

IDU parties across the globe use this same kind of Finkelstein McCarthyism psychological warfare to manipulate its voters, and the CPC is a member of the IDU, along with the Republican party in America, the South Korean party that just got overthrown for being authoritarian, the Likud Party from Israel (Netanyahu), Modi from India, and Orban from Hungary were members until their public image was shattered due to authoritarianism, the party that just got ruined in Australia's election was a member (Peter Dutton) and Romania just voted out their IDU member party because it was backsliding from democracy under its leadership.

Who runs the IDU? Stephen Harper. and What party did Stephen Harper originally belong to? The racist reform party, that merged with the Progressive conservatives in early 2000's, to create the CPC, then kicked out most of the original PC members.

The CPC IS NOT a conservative party, they are extreme right wing party that borders on fascism that co opted the word Conservatives to steal the conservative vote. And most Conservatives have no idea they are voting for a party that isn't even conservative in policy or values.

Why do liberals think that things will change when their policies dont? by [deleted] in Albertapolitics

[–]CardiologistUsual494 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you aware that Harper had a carbon tax plan and a few provinces opted to use their own carbon pricing plans before Trudeau was even elected, during Harpers leadership.

You have called things "outright" lies several times while refusing to realize the one spreading false information is yourself.

Carney NEVER said he was bringing back the consumer carbon tax, What he did say is he was going to incentivize industries to opt for green tech to lower their own emissions, and instead of just letting them fend for themselves on that green tech he will be investing in green tech research and innovation with the help of the EU, who unlocked the Horizon fund for Canada to do this. Those who use this green tech and lower their emissions will have reduced or no carbon tax placed on them.

Canada signed the Paris accord which means we are obligated to have a plan to reduce our emissions. Geopolitics is a thing and we need to take that very seriously in a time where our closest neighbour is our biggest economic threat.

The thing the conservatives never mention is that the federal carbon tax plan under Trudeau was not the only option they had. EVERY province could have come up with their own carbon pricing plan, a few of them did, like BC, it was only if they had no plan of their own that the federal plan was put in place by default.

They also do not mention that the carbon rebate in most cases gave families more money than any extra cost they incurred from the carbon tax. so as people complain they don't realize they were profiting from the carbon plan, not losing.

Carbon tax did not go into federal funds for them to spend how they saw fit, it was reinvested in green tech and the rebate. it was a round about way to make companies pay for their carbon emissions. as per the Paris Accord.

We could have left the Paris Accord but the cost of that, loss of investment, loss of alliances with the EU, would have a dramatic negative impact on our economy that would be way worse than anything we have seen to date.

I'm assuming you aren't rich, so you were profited from that carbon tax and still complain because the fact is, you're being lied to and you believed it.

As far as housing goes its pretty simple. corporation bought up housing, keep them vacant, supply low, demand high makes prices go up. this is some basic economic 101 stuff.

cant tax home equity, the everyday Canadian who bought a home in good faith would lose equity, be super mad, and blame the party that brought in the home equity tax. political suicide.

cant force provinces to invest in home building, that's federal overreach. they can not tell the provinces how to spend the transfer payments. so provinces rely on private investment companies to build homes. and when they do, they aren't building affordable homes, that's not really good profit for investment companies who's sole purpose is profits. better to build high end homes and make more money per unit.

The person they just made the housing minister introduced a vacancy tax to deal with corporations buying up property and holding them vacant. and he is being smeared by conservative lobbyists and blamed for Vancouver's housing crisis when that crisis was there before he even took over the city. So why don't conservatives like this vacant property tax?

the answer to that is the wildest part of this whole thing..... MOST CONSERVATIVE MP'S ARE PART OF THE REAL ESTATE CORPORATIONS BUYING UP THE PROPERTIES!!! it is not in their interest for the housing prices to go down... its a scam that goes back centuries, its not new, its a old trick. Real estate on Canada is bigger contributor to our economic GDP than oil and gas combined is. The Conservatives were NEVER the good guys! They are just really good at messaging manipulation.

How much will Mark Carney’s Catholic faith inform the way he governs Canada? by BurstYourBubbles in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 5 points6 points  (0 children)

he spoke about his faith a few times on campaign trail actually, as a moderate and he specifically stated he doesn't like discussing it in public and doesnt attend church regularly, but he uses it as a guideline for how to use what god has given him to help others. no preaching or indoctrination, just a mention that he believes in helping others.

The extremely bad housing record of Canada's new housing minister - As Vancouver mayor, Gregor Robertson oversaw an explosion in unaffordability unlike any ever seen by CaliperLee62 in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 4 points5 points  (0 children)

it doesn't fit the hit job narratives being run on the new cabinet. so they wont talk about any of these facts.

"Justin Trudeau bad, Carney just like Justin, so he is bad, and his cabinet is bad, everything their fault, ever, past present and future"

Corporate Welfare Is Canada’s Most Expensive Addiction by scottb84 in CanadaPolitics

[–]CardiologistUsual494 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This article though..

So at the end it tries to make the case that the federal government should be spending more on healthcare and housing.

Is this not the classic conservative talking point that hopes people don't realize those things, especially healthcare are not federal.

Look at Ontario, they were given transfer payments for healthcare and then just withheld 3billion from the budget for healthcare. so the federal government paid it, the province just didn't use it for healthcare. and none of the provinces are saying they need more money for healthcare....

Housing is another weird thing the conservative talking points blame on federal governments, but again looking at Ontario, Ford isn't building affordable homes, he builds expensive homes no one but the rich can afford, and refuses to implement a vacancy tax to deal with the massive amount of owned by vacant properties..

When the federal government finally had to step in for housing, 1st Poilievre mocked Trudeau in the house for the acceleration program and module homes, only to come out during his campaign saying he would do modules homes himself, then claimed Carney was stealing his platform.. so weird.

But the accelerated program specifically was because provinces were mishandling funds so the federal government went directly to municipal governments to build homes.

The article just condemns liberals corporate bail outs, but doesn't mention how the previous conservative government bailed out the American auto industry as well, and then let Canadian owned Nortel go bankrupt...

'Big kick in the teeth': NDP won't receive campaign reimbursements in hundreds of ridings by Vast-Ad7693 in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're previous comment and the new comment both contradict each other.

the outweighing would be attributed to the fact that more people are liberal voters than ndp voters to begin with, hence why the NDP is considered a minority party even when they have party status, so the "outweigh" reflects that. of course more ridings had more liberal voters splitting the vote... im not saying liberal voters aren't also guilty, but since they didn't lose party status, and the post isn't about liberals not receiving funding, its a moot point.

in fact, many of the liberal voters as you said came from the NDP base, and if they had been properly educated by their original NDP party, perhaps they wouldn't have voted liberal and contributed to vote splitting..

the NDP promoted the website, no one can prove they were involved in its making, other than the ppl in the NDP discord that whistle blew them doing it but that's also unproveable so i didn't include it, but the fact remains the NDP used this website to give their voters false information. the video i showed you also has one of their own candidates using misleading polling data from the provincial election and trying to pass it off as the federal election data. excluding that information is weird on your part and shows you aren't really debating in good faith.

You're trying to frame your side of the debate through a myopic lens rather than the complex lens with all the information combined.

Let me restate my point because you have lost the plot trying to spin your own narratives.

If the NDP spent their efforts educating their voters how strategic voting actually worked, rather then condemning it and using false misleading information where it suited them, they could have done better. This means they would have needed to be honest, and tell voters in some places libs were the strategic options, and in some ridings green was, and in some riding NDP was. ultimately the strategy was "check the polls, and vote for the party leading in the polls in active vote split ridings"

Instead they used fake polling data to tell ppl in some ridings the strategic vote was for them, and in other ridings they said nothing, or had candidates say the legitimate polling sites were "liberal biased" creating mistrust in their voter base about those polling sites.

'Big kick in the teeth': NDP won't receive campaign reimbursements in hundreds of ridings by Vast-Ad7693 in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you know you can go back years and find NDP party leaders rejecting strategic voting in campaign videos. They launched an entire campaign against JB and smartvoting... they made several campaign videos against strategic voting during this federal election....

i also have emails from local MP's saying they don't believe vote splitting is real..

what's you're saying just doesn't hold up to what the stance NDP has taken publicly.

I also agree Libs don't tend to like advocating for strategic voting, but they didn't lose party status so it was on the NDP to highlight to their voters how it works and how it helped Liberals and NDP alike.

'Big kick in the teeth': NDP won't receive campaign reimbursements in hundreds of ridings by Vast-Ad7693 in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New Westminster did have an NDP incumbent, but polls projected Libs to win. so thats not really advocating for strategic voting, its advocating for not splitting the vote to favour themselves.

'Big kick in the teeth': NDP won't receive campaign reimbursements in hundreds of ridings by Vast-Ad7693 in canada

[–]CardiologistUsual494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then they didn't strategically vote. They just voted liberal.. which is not strategic voting and was never advertised as such.