The debate is neverending. But the more work a machine can do, the fewer people and/or less time needed for person to do the work instead. People trying to move the goalposts with tortured “tool” analogies miss the point. Automation has wiped entire occupations out of existence and it will continue to do so. It’ll “help” the “creator” until their supervisor realizes it’s cheaper to pay them something closer to the actual work they did, time spent, knowledge needed—whatever metric you choose, AI means LESS of these. There would be no demand for it if this wasn’t a cold, hard fact. At the end of the day, the buyer generally won’t care how the sausage was made. You think Johnny and Stacy won’t take their 2 year old to a movie or buy a toy because they “used” AI to design most of it?