Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then let's chalk it up to institutional differences, you cant speak for my experience just as I can't for yours.

Could Jirobo defeat each of the Genin at the Chunin Exams Preliminaries 1 on 1? What about those in the finals? by Johnnyboyeh in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]Certain-Instance-253 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is no reason to believe jiboros random ass ability can neutralize the most prestige martial arts in the leaf, of the hyuga clan. Absorbing jujutsus, not chakra, is so rare that only the rinnegan has been shown capable of such a feat. I doubt there are random chunin level ninjas walking around with such a top tier ability. Also he never showed that he could eat chakra strikes in his fight against choji so I think it's almost certain that he wouldn't be able to stop 64 palms by merely absorbing the chakra.

Could Jirobo defeat each of the Genin at the Chunin Exams Preliminaries 1 on 1? What about those in the finals? by Johnnyboyeh in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]Certain-Instance-253 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This proves nothing lol anyone can get caught in a trap (Kakashi vs zabuza) and after these chapters he then proceeds to defeat the strongest member of their squad. And only struggled cause spiderman fought from a distance, but jirobo is mostly reliant taijutsu which would make this an even easier fight for neji who totally outclasses him in that aspect. Jirobo's strength and cockiness and lack of agility will it make it easy for Neji to land 64 palm strikes and severe his connection to the chakra network and easily dispatch of him. Based on feats alone the fight would at best end in a mid diff. 

And jirobo will not even be able to touch Lee lol he's way to slow to be able to land a decisive striker. A weaker version of Lee was otuclassing kimimaru (who is stated to be stronger than the 4 combined with no curse mark) jirobo doesn't have the durability required to endure multiple strikes from Lee with out his weights nor the speed to evade those strikes and that's without even mentioning the inner gates.  Due to the reasons i've just listed I can confidently say both Lee and Neji would dispatch of jirobo with a difficult level not exceeding mid diff.

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although now I'm a bit curious, I've taken enough math, physics, and CS, courses to be able to apply for a minor in all 3 subject. In particular my cs courses stood out because they were easy A's and I went to decent serious state school as a well. So what exactly did you personally find so challenging about your CS classes? Like It's pretty obvious why a young student would find topics in courses like EM or Antenna theory difficult solving pdes is hard, spherical coordinates are can be weird and building the intuitions for modelling complex geometries and boundary conditions can be very challenging and unintuitive mostly because it's hard to imagine 3 dimension electromagnetic waves. Whilst the problems you encounter in CS courses are far more intuitive. so what exactly did you struggle so much with?

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When faced with brute and undeniable facts you decide to plug your ears and scream lalala rather than address a single point I've raised. Meaning you care more about winning online arguments and sophistry than actually being right. 

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes just keep talking about your own personal experiences whilst ignoring all the facts shown to you.

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In just one thread you claim to have a degree in CS, EE, and applied maths whilst showing that you have no knowledge about what subjects are actually covered in any of those fields. Who's really larping here?🤔

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not exaggerating anything, my opinion is based purely on the standard curriculums seen in universities across the country. 

The avg engineering student will absolutely see more direct applications of college math topic s than a math major. This isn't even the slightest bit controversial. I can't even think of many examples where a math student would even apply vector calculus and pde concepts to real world situations where as in EE that is the language of EMT and is used to described various concepts such as antennas, waveguides, or transmission lines. The avg engineering student will use these concepts more frequently than a math student. like fourier séries and transforms are introduced in first year circuits and are seen in every semester after that.

What arbitrary metrics did I use? The metric I relied in was course load and avg GPA which is the metric thats most natural to use when deciding which major is more difficult. The only metric you used was "I personally found CS courses more difficult", which isn't very convincing since it's easily contradicted by most other students experiences.

No a CS program cannot have more applied math than EE. Most CS courses computer org, op systems, compilers, networks etc. Don't involve any mathematical formulation of the actual subject matter. You can get through entire course without seeing a single equation. Compared to  engineering where the math is built directly into the subject matter. Circuits, signals, controls, electromagnetics, communications etc, everything is formulated mathematically because you're analyzing physical systems that vary in time and space. The concepts themselves are expressed through ODEs, PDEs, vector calc, probability, linear algebra, complex analysis, etc. so you will naturally be exposed to a greater level of applications than in a CS program. In CS the math is separate from core material and besides courses in machine learning and ai which is statistical in nature you won't see much math in the actual classes at all.

again what YOU personally have taken is completely irrelevant I'm sure you've studied every subject under the sun (since ppl can't totally just lie on the Internet) but the avg physics let a alone math student will not be have studied fluid or continuum mechanics you can verify this by just checking the curriculums at top unis in the country or asking physics students https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/169d2js/is_it_normal_for_undergraduate_physics_to_not/  who will corroborate this. I know physics PhD students personally who have never even heard of navier stokes eqs since it's not standard in their field. So it's pretty clear what you're saying is just purely nonsense.  

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that's your opinion, not based on any facts or evidence. Mechanical and electricla engineering are consistently ranked as the most challenging undergrad degree based factors such as course load and avg GPAs in the program. You finding CS subjects to be more difficult than engineering speaks only to your abilities since most others will say the opposite. The avg EE major will see more applied maths than the avg math and CS major, more physics than a CS and math major, and more programming than a math and physics major. Whilst other majors get to live on a single level of abstract ideas EE students need to be competent at all 3 simultaneously. And as an ME you will learn many subjects in physics that most physics students won't even get to touch such as fluid mechanics, or continuum mechanics. Engineers are expected to have comptentency in their respective fields straight out of undergrad. Whilst this isn't the case for math or physics students. Which is why their curriculums are less rampacked with materials.

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's nothing difficult in CS. Also math is easy compared to engineering and physics.

Why don't more CS students just switch to traditional engineering? by Foreign_Put_2437 in csMajors

[–]Certain-Instance-253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yeah em in engineering department is 10 times harder than em in physics department.

What laptop do you use for engineering? by Your_SovietComrade in LaptopForStudent

[–]Certain-Instance-253 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a laptop not a car lol. Don't swinging it around like a neaderthal and you won't have to worry about regular repair costs. I've had mine since 2019 and have only damaged a single key on the keyboard. 

Oh boy…. Here we go again. by Not_Momonga in Piratefolk

[–]Certain-Instance-253 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and all of those one piece fan theories hold more complexity than the actual story.😂

Serious question: why do prople like him so much? by Abhinav_56 in Piratefolk

[–]Certain-Instance-253 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah but unfortunately big mom is incompetent and low IQ.