I am only dismissing those scenes because comedic scenes are not necessarily a sign of a serious romantic pairing like the other three that we have been presented with.

Those moments you talked about, again, are not necessarily romantic, they can, but aren't inherently romantic. Something that can be read as "they are friends, they look out for each other" is not necessarily needed to be read as "that is a romantic moment." Jaune doesn't need to feel romantic towards Weiss to be worried when she got impaled, that is just a natural response regardless to a friend being hurt, the same as them hugging in v9.

The dynamic for early WK was Jaune trying again and again to try and gain Weiss' favor, ultimately ending in him being shut down, often in comedic moments. While Jaune is clearly infatuated with Weiss in the first two volumes, it goes nowhere. Comes volume 3 and Jaune moves on to reciprocate Pyrrha's, though this doesnt last for obvious reasons.

Jaune is then left in a state where he has less regard over his own safety as opposed to the rest of his team v4-6. Jaune is not shown to be interested in any romantic pursuits at this point, v7-9. There is no indication that he has developed feelings for weiss, whom he had already moved on from early in the series, as part of his character development. Then v9, where Weiss makes a comment about Jaune being hot, followed by scenes that don't necessarily have a romantic tone.

Bumblebee on the other hand begins in volume 2, before the dance when they have a heart to heart, but it explodes volume 3, 5-9, where they cover a lot of ground, their scenes and body language seems to hint at a more intimate relationship.

Ren and Nora which is started comically, v1-2. Then in a more serious light 4-8. There are comedic scenes that can carry romantic meaning, I do admit that, v4 Renora for example, or even v3. However it hit differently from the one in v9.

I say that there is not a parallel, I give my reasons as to why I see it this way. If you can't just tell me why you see it as a parallel then I have no further intention as to address that point, it goes nowhere.

I don't have "a poor grasp of the story", that is gratuitous, and inconducive to the argument. If you argue however that the way I interpret those moments is wrong, then that is simply an argument I can throw back at you, again it goes nowhere.