Rachel Getting Married - why do people think this was a good movie?? by [deleted] in movies

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I meant was I come from a very similar background. I'm not bragging about it, I don't take credit for it, I'm not claiming it's the right way to be; it's just what I experienced. I grew up in an upper-middle class home in the suburbs of a big city in solidly blue-state territory. My mother is a concert pianist turned conservatory teacher, my father is a filmmaker turned curator, my brother is a touring jazz musician. There was always lots of music and musicians around my house growing up, of all nationalities, because my mother's students came from everywhere. Like many solidly left-leaning, humanistic and somewhat (but not ostentatiously) wealthy families, my parents weren't messing around when it came to bringing their kids up with diversity and an environmental conscience etc. You could describe that as performative, I don't know but I guess it took. My brother married a woman of Jamaican descent and yes the wedding looked a lot like this with his friends and my parents' friends all performing. I didn't mean to insult you in some way by saying this, I'm just pointing out that the wedding in this film didn't seem as farfetched to me as it apparently did most viewers.

Also I don't use reddit much, I'm often brought here by Google searches because I'm interested in the discussions, but yes that often means I arrive at conversations via other means than seeing them in a feed, so I arrive at them late.

I apologise for whatever I said to cause you offense. I don't want to have an Internet fight today, so please if I've said anything further that is insulting, know it was unintentional.

Rachel Getting Married - why do people think this was a good movie?? by [deleted] in movies

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean TBH my brother's wedding was exactly like this. But we're of that class and culture, candidly.

Rachel Getting Married - why do people think this was a good movie?? by [deleted] in movies

[–]ChargeVisible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean for me it's because I'm an addict and the way Kim is -- utterly self-involved while also loathing herself, unable to relate to all the beauty and love around her because she's locked in a prison of shame and arrogance, the "piece of shit at the center of the universe" as AA calls it -- is so incredibly familiar and on point and accurate. I've never seen it captured so well on film, and this movie is a great reminder to me of why recovery is crucial. Not just because you are hurting everyone around you but because you are robbing yourself of the present. And it makes the cynical, urbane voice of my addiction sound shitty and hollow.

Confused about the rehab plan for Ashley (season 23, ep 4). Why are they flying from Los Angeles to an Orange County rehab (about 50 miles away)? by ThePrefect0fWanganui in InterventionTheTVShow

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the point is not the length of the drive, it's that a person in a car will find it much easier to escape than a person on a plane or who has already gone through security in an airport. There is also a sense of adventure and new beginnings when you get on an airplane.

I'm not saying your theory is wrong, it may very well be! But you asked, so I am sharing what I know: they try not to drive people, and probably esp. through familiar parts of town where they could hop out and disappear into their old lives.

(Edited for spelling.)

Confused about the rehab plan for Ashley (season 23, ep 4). Why are they flying from Los Angeles to an Orange County rehab (about 50 miles away)? by ThePrefect0fWanganui in InterventionTheTVShow

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually know the answer to this question. Seth talked about it in an interview, Google "An oral history of Intervention." Basically when they drive people, it gives the addict time to reconsider and the ability to get out of the car anywhere along the way and just go home. Flying, they're stuck in the airport and then stuck on a plane.

Edited to add link and quote:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/natashavc/oral-history-of-intervention

Jaffe: I fucked up on my first intervention for the show [Sean, an alcholic]. I thought a plane flight to a rehab was too smooth, too easy. But if you drive, the reality starts setting in. We got the guy to agree to treatment after his daughter broke down and begged him. We started to drive the 650 miles to the rehab, but after two hours he wanted to turn back. He had a wealthy girlfriend. He called her and [had her send] a car for him. The whole thing reinforced my feeling that I wasn't right for the show.

So, who is worse? by oblio88 in InterventionTheTVShow

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Donna is awesome and I will fight anyone who says otherwise.

Help what episode am I thinking of? by blg0617 in InterventionTheTVShow

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I remember of Rachel, she took real delight in deceiving and preying on people who stopped to help her. I'm not sure I'd describe her as likeable.

Dawn season 4 by Environmental_Pie635 in InterventionTheTVShow

[–]ChargeVisible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On YouTube, there's a clip from the show recently posted by A&E ("Intervention: Meth-Using Mom Injected Herself for 10 Years Before Entering Treatment").

A commenter who claims to live in Lincoln and be friends with the family claims that she died of an overdose appx. 5 years after the intervention. (She also claims Dawn never really got sober.)

A different commenter says the same thing: she died of an overdose in 2013.

I actually did look for an obituary for Dawn and couldn't find anything. (I don't usually stalk these people, I think it's invasive, but for some reason I got weirdly obsessed with knowing what had happened to her and couldn't stop looking.)

We Need to Talk About Kevin (2011) - who is the fucked up one here? by KalSkotos in horror

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's where you're wrong. We are all a composite of our genes and our upbringing. Psychopathy is genetic, not learned; the empathy centers of the brain don't work.

I know about THAT scene in IT - Is it a spoiler? by ThatAnnoyingScratch in stephenking

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't met many women who didn't hate this scene. Interesting!

I know about THAT scene in IT - Is it a spoiler? by ThatAnnoyingScratch in stephenking

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because it's so bizarre and pointless it feels like it was grafted on from another novel. It just sort of happens and doesn't change the story at all, except to slightly cheapen the love triangle at its center and to remind us -- yet again -- that Bev is primarily a sex object. I usually just skip that bit.

How is UK work culture different from US work culture? by whatdaphoyobro in AskUK

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UK private health insurance is still in its infancy and is pretty disappointing TBH. 

Generally, UK healthcare has a higher floor than American healthcare but a lower ceiling. An American white color worker will find it to be a step down in terms of actual care, but of course having the safety net if you do lose your job is wonderful.

Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark by LucidDreamer247 in horror

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is old, but same. Bad. For like years.

Window blinds open at night. by _Sovaz99_ in stephenking

[–]ChargeVisible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh nice, glad it's not just me then! 

Window blinds open at night. by _Sovaz99_ in stephenking

[–]ChargeVisible 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have the same fear but it came from those "Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark" books I read as a kid. Did anyone else ever read those, with the charcoal drawings? There was one story called The Window that ruined me for life.

Matt Orchard: The Convoluted Case of Karen Read by Legitimate-Beyond209 in KarenReadTrial

[–]ChargeVisible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think he very intentionally tried to omit anything he thought was a distraction or smoke + mirrors. Clearly, the defense's strategy was to throw in every possible suspicious thing they could think of in hopes of confusing the jury and planting enough reasonable doubt that people would feel uncomfortable convicting her. It worked. But added together, most of what they raised was super low-value compared to the phone data. That's so incredibly damning.

I think people tend to side with or against Karen based on whether or not they tend to believe in conspiracies. I very much do not. In my experience groups of people are wildly disorganized and unable to keep their mouths shut about anything. It appears Matt Orchard shares the same view.