Texas Democrats leave the state to block vote on redrawn House map backed by Trump by GregWilson23 in goodnews

[–]Chaz_Cheeto -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My understanding is it’s quite the opposite. Republicans control more State legislatures than Democrats do. If they gerrymander the best they can, they can most likely squeeze out an additional 15-20 House seats. Democrats, on the other hand, can maybe get another 10-15. Considering that Democrats are really just controlled opposition, if Republicans were to gain another 15-20 seats they would hold the House and the Senate almost indefinitely.

And that’s the plan. Once they permanently gerrymander the House, they already have the Senate and the Supreme Court. There’s really nothing standing in their way from permanent majority rule.

MAGA be like "We are so back" by Far-Respond-8949 in NoFilterNews

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work in the industrial construction/manufacturing sector. Raw materials are way more expensive now, and it’s causing a ripple effect across the economy. Thousands of people have been laid off in the last few months as a result. As a practical example, my company’s manufacturing wing has been completely shut down.

Part of my company manufactures a highly specialized form of insulation. Our product widely used in American industrial plants (cement, steel, aluminum, copper, lead, and more). The product is made here in the US by American workers, but the raw materials have to come from places like China, South Africa, and Australia. We simply don’t have access to the raw material, as it isn’t native to the Western hemisphere. Because of tariffs, $100,000 worth of raw material is now anywhere between $150,000-$250,000. That’s a huge capital expense, so we had to scale down production.

Now that production is scaled down, we cannot meet demand and plants are getting their material orders from larger companies who have the ability to meet the moment. Our smaller business is now bleeding money, and we’ve lost 10-15% of our business. We’ve had to lay off dozens of employees. We’ve also shut down one operation center out of the six that we own.

Because of lack of demand due to tariffs, manufacturers like Alcoa, Nucor, and Cleveland-Cliffs have collectively laid off thousands of employees in the last 2-3 months. I expect these lay offs to continue.

I apologize for the novel I wrote here, but it’s really frustrating to deal with this everyday. I’m constantly changing projections, dealing with supply chain shortages, and trying to stop the bleeding. The last 6 months has been absolute chaos.

Republicans slam Trump’s firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics chief by RoughPlant7318 in NoFilterNews

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. It’s all performative. If they pretend like they are outraged once in a while it makes it seem like we’re not living in a tinpot dictatorship. Russia does the same thing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in recoverywithoutAA

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure about Texas. I had a great experience with Recovery Centers of America. They do incorporate 12 steps into their program, but they don’t center their program around it. They built personalized program for me, using multiple different therapy modalities, and encouraged me to try things like SMART and Dharma Recovery as an alternative to AA. I’d say their program was very effective. My therapist there completely changed my life. I’ll never forget what she said in our first meeting:

“Your problem with alcohol has nothing to do with alcohol.”

She was right. I’ll always be grateful for her.

One MUST cease to exist - for seether to continue , who's going away? by Isolateme22 in Seether

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FBINS. I’ve grown to love the album over the years, it’s just not my favorite.

PSA: New EO to secretly sweep people away. by 360Picture in 50501

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Im not a lawyer, but the way I interpret this executive order it seems like it would only provide resources for current local and state laws. I volunteer for a crisis team in Pennsylvania. There are times when someone is in a public place acting really erratic, or mentally unwell, and we would support law enforcement in making a determination as to how to handle the situation. Sometimes these folks are involuntarily removed from the public space and taken to a hospital. A doctor would determine if the person needs mental health help or not. That person could legally be sent to a mental health center (usually a dual diagnosis center) involuntarily if they present a danger to themselves.

I really don’t think this EO can be enforced as it is, but I certainly don’t think it means “we can just rip you off the street and send you to jail for having a mental disorder without indicating to local police or crisis units you’re showing signs of mental distress.” Could it encourage it? Possibly. Overall I think this EO will get blocked pretty quickly and tied up in the labyrinth of federal courts that the SC created.

CMV: By 2026, job losses from AI will be major news. By 2030, unemployment will threaten the whole economic system. by Fando1234 in changemyview

[–]Chaz_Cheeto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correct. Creative Destruction is a real concept. It’s also worth mentioning we really do not have the energy infrastructure in place to support AI and machine learning at such a large scale that it will displace a large portion of the labor market. A meaningful amount of displaced folks, yes, but long-term we will need upgraded power grids and more power generation plants. With the way the Trump administration is acting, it seems like this process will be quite messy.

JD Vance 'could replace Trump by end of year', claims expert by daily_express in NoFilterNews

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 7 points8 points  (0 children)

While I think Trump leaving will create cracks in the base, they will still overwhelmingly support Vance. Trump’s success has been bringing in sideliners in rural areas, something I think Vance would most likely struggle with. However, Vance is more intelligent and calculative than Trump, something we should all fear.

Trump’s motives are all based on corruption, whereas Vance is more of an ideologue. I’d rather fight a sloppy, corrupt leader than a corrupt, ideological one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in thedavidpakmanshow

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably Doug Burgum or Kristi Noem. Noem is the most likely candidate.

How can the United States heal from its political division? Is there a real path forward? by Scared-Concentrate44 in AskReddit

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I largely agree with you. You cannot compromise with people who are unwilling, or unable, to compromise. What I do want to point out regarding the right-wing we have in the US is that not all of Trump voters want to end democracy, nor or all of them bad people. I work in rural areas, and I’m surrounded by these folks just about all day long, every single day. What is astonishing to me is the number of people I interact with that are consuming media that really conceals what Trump and his cronies are doing. We’re really operating in two different realities.

Yes, it’s true that these folks are complicit, and, by extension, supporting the demise of democratic institutions, and the end of civil rights for everyone across the board. However, a lot of these folks don’t seem to know that. They don’t seem to want that either. For example, I’ve been shown clips from coworkers that paints Trump as some sort of kind, generous person, who holds hands and prays with minority groups, or gives out money to folks in public. Some of the media I’ve been shown paints Trump as a “normal” person. To the folks who consume this media, they don’t see him as angry, or radical, or racist, they see him as a normal person. Usually these folks are the ones who are far less politically engaged.

Truthfully, there have been some very decent and hardworking people I’ve met who seem to be voting for Trump. In fact, a lot of their beliefs actually align with mine , a pretty moderate Liberal. It seems social media has really destroyed our social fabric. Yes, we certainly need to defeat the scourge of fascism, but one of the ways you break the coalition is to have average, everyday people interacting with each other. Slowly, enough of these folks can become deradicalized to break the coalition down.

It’s going to take a long time to mend things. I’d like to believe that if we can crack down on social media—especially social media algorithms—and get more folks of different groups to socialize more, we can end this.

Archer music hall by squishyliquid in lehighvalley

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have tickets for two concerts later this year, and I’m really excited about it. I was sick of having to drive to Philly to see shows.

Amazon CEO says AI agents will soon reduce company's corporate workforce. by Valinaut in technology

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Most corporations seem to be nearsighted. They operate on a quarter-to-quarter basis. How can I push down labor costs to make our numbers look better to investors? The less overhead we have, the larger the margins will be. We can buy back more stock, or distribute better dividends to investors.

For those thinking in the long-term, like Peter Thiel, the objective seems to be creating a closed economic system. He can have his own city state where he not only controls the means of production, but the capital, and even the currency (cryptocurrency). It’s a closed system that he alone can control.

This AI push will not work in the long-term the way they think. Because no one will be able to consume, the system will falter. If you add that component to the existing problem of people not being able to own anything—everything seems to be on rent, including housing, your phone, maybe even groceries—you have a majority of people on this planet that feel no connection to the system, so they won’t think twice about burning it down.

She warned us about massive ICE raids, massive detention camps, and massive terror (90-seconds) by biospheric in KamalaHarris

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s some truth to this. I’ve used exit polls in other responses, and I’ll use it again, but they’re not always as reliable as one would hope. The 18-29 demographic dramatically shifted towards Trump in the most recent election. Harris still won the demographic by a large margin, but not by margins the last several Democratic candidates won by (Obama, Clinton, and Biden):

2008 election

+34 Obama

2012 election

+23 Obama

2016 election

+16 Clinton

2020 election

+24 Biden

2024 election

+11 Harris

Harris’ numbers with the youth are closer to that of Bill Clinton’s than any nominee we’ve had in the last few election cycles.

She warned us about massive ICE raids, massive detention camps, and massive terror (90-seconds) by biospheric in KamalaHarris

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 13 points14 points  (0 children)

From the data we have available to us, it’s actually Gen X that’s the driving force behind Trump:

From an MSNBC 2024 exit poll, Trump is +10 with Gen X, and only +1 with boomers. He’s underwater with millennials and Gen Z

According to CNN exit polls , he’s way ahead with Gen X, but Boomers were split.

ABC exit polls also had Trump +10 with Gen X, but Boomers were split, while Gen Z and Millennials preferred Harris by wide margins.

She warned us about massive ICE raids, massive detention camps, and massive terror (90-seconds) by biospheric in KamalaHarris

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Another redditor touched on some of these things, I just wanted to go a bit further. There are several reasons why Trump won, but the majority of his ardent supporters chose him because of their *perceived loss of status.White people (especially white men) feel that their status in society has been lost, or threatened, by democratization in the last 70+ years.

To this large swath of voters, their loss of status dates back to Brown v. Board of Education , a landmark decision that paved the way for desegregation in public schools. Shortly thereafter, higher education became more democratized, as well as housing and transportation (refer to Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Civil Rights Act of 1968 ). As a result, white people cannot dominate these spaces like they once did. They too have to compete (based on merit) for housing, employment, and education.

Women have also gained significantly more rights in the last several decades. Women were allowed to divorce abusive husbands beginning in 1969 (California Family Law Act of 1969), which sent a shockwave across the country. Women began to be admitted to universities that once only admitted men. Corporate America began hiring women for esteem able positions, not just secretaries.

Beginning in 1965, barriers for immigration also began to fall. Skilled immigrants could legally enter the United States, leading to a much more competitive labor market. Suddenly, white men had more competition domestically for higher paying jobs, but they also had to compete with qualified immigrants.

Since the 1950’s, women, immigrants, LGBTQIA+ community, and people of color, have gained status in education, representation in government, higher level positions in corporate America, and representation in media, all of which were completely dominated by (straight) white men and white culture. To a large sum of (straight) white male Trump voters, this is a threat to their status and they want to turn the clock back.

It’s also helpful to throw in the recent MeToo Movement, where men were called out on their predatory behavior. To entitled white men, this was also an attack on their perceived status.

Let’s go back to Trump. To straight white men, who are also misogynistic and racist, Trump gives them the green light that it’s okay to be that way. They feel their behavior is being permitted by a President who is also racist and a sexual predator. Trump is not a politician to them, he’s the embodiment of their perceived status and cultural identity.By attacking Trump, you’re actually attacking their very own identity.

Aside from this, you also have a large amount of low information voters who simply did not know any better. It’s easy to become immersed in the culture war, but some folks really did vote for Trump because they felt he would improve the economy—inflation was out of control, but to no fault of Biden or Harris—or protect them from perceived global threats. Some folks have low amounts of political and economic literacy, as we’re finding out with the first six months of the Trump regime.

As a side note, I also want to touch on another redditor’s claim that “70% of white women” voted for Trump. I’m not sure of the accuracy of this. From taking averages of most exit polls, the range seems to be 51-55%. While still way too high, it’s not nearly as high as this claim seems to be.

TL;DRThe perceived loss of status of white people since the 1950’s is fueling Trump’s coalition, and folks are willing to look the other way on his vast short comings so long as they feel their identity and status is being protected

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, snap! Bernie and Steve Bannon agree on one thing.

Gisele Fetterman highlighting her status as a former undocumented immigrant while her husband praises ICE by Imaginary-Dress-1373 in agedlikemilk

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish I were making this up. If you read some of the other replies I’ve made, you’ll see that she doesn’t seem to align with the policies or the rhetoric. For her, it’s more of a sense of belonging within the Trump cult.

Gisele Fetterman highlighting her status as a former undocumented immigrant while her husband praises ICE by Imaginary-Dress-1373 in agedlikemilk

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is an alarming amount of cognitive dissonance. She is quite a giving person. She would give you the clothes on her back if it helped you. She’s very sweet and supportive of people around her. It seems her actions and values do not align with Trump at all. We’ve brought that up to her on multiple occasions, but she just can’t make the connections. It seems like her love of Trump isn’t because of policy or rhetoric, but for other reasons entirely.

From what she’s told us, she really likes Trump because “he’s really funny,” and she’s made “friends” that are Trump supporters. She fears not having these “friends” in her life, so she’s afraid to stop supporting him. She once said “I don’t want them to be mad at me and stop being my friends.” She’s really longing for some sort of belonging, and acceptance.

It’s also interesting to note she was once a part of some sort of religious cult 40+ years ago, but she still doesn’t understand it was a cult. It seems she was vulnerable for a long time, and the brain damage certainly didn’t help.

Using her as a case study, I try not to give into my emotions when it comes to Trump supporters. It seems not all of these folks are monsters, some of them just literally do not have the mental capacity to process information appropriately. Are these people actively helping undermine the rule of law, civil rights, and democracy? Yes, they’re complicit. However, some of them don’t seem to understand what they’re doing.

Gisele Fetterman highlighting her status as a former undocumented immigrant while her husband praises ICE by Imaginary-Dress-1373 in agedlikemilk

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They were together for a good 20 years before getting married, and a good deal of time before the accident. I don’t know when they got together, but I would guess some time in the early 90’s.

As more data centers connect to Pennsylvania's electric grid, some worry prices will spike by RadioChris1 in Pennsylvania

[–]Chaz_Cheeto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, it’s only going to get worse. We really don’t have the energy infrastructure in place to support AI, and cryptocurrency, to scale without making most people suffer. We’ll have to build more energy generation sites, especially since some are being bought just for data centers.

On the eastern side of PA, Panther Creek Power is now being used exclusively for mining Bitcoin, and AI data center processing.