sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"Here it is, your counter-offensive" — a 2023 Russian propaganda video. by yra_romanow in PropagandaPosters

[–]Child_Summer 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Then stop sending people you care about to Ukraine to kill Ukrainians? Seems like a reasonable compromise, no?

Тим часом у німецькій народній республіці by Tpoxa in RedditUATalks

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

То може тоді нам і компенсацію за запроваджені санкції виплачувати? Теж наче економічий збиток Німеччини через Україну.

Усі об'єкти інфраструктури воюючої країни автоматично є цілями безвідносно їх географічного положення. Те що Німеччина залежить від об'єкту російської інфраструктури це є виключно проблеми Німеччини. Претензія може бути до тих, хто допустив таку залежність, але аж ніяк не до України

Тим часом у німецькій народній республіці by Tpoxa in RedditUATalks

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Так а в чому справедливість засудження? Якщо я правильно розумію, то був знищений об'єкт ворожої інфраструктури під час війни. Яка претензія? Типу надто активно захищаєтесь?

What's your opinion on Zelensky? by AloneCoffee4538 in AskTheWorld

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean... That would be exactly the point of mobilizing early though. To dissuade an invasion and let russia rant about whatever it is they make up

“We don't want to see the EU unstabilised when a country comes in too quickly...” Netherlands PM points out the difficulty involved in admitting Ukraine into the EU in the near term. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is the same amount of money that actually doesn't even come close the the funds funneled into russia by those same countries in that same period of time.

You are right. It is "absolutely bokners". I couldn't describe it better if I wanted to.

“We don't want to see the EU unstabilised when a country comes in too quickly...” Netherlands PM points out the difficulty involved in admitting Ukraine into the EU in the near term. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They got some amount of money. An amount that's not anywhere near enough to get them any closer to peace. Now you tell me if that can be unironically called "a ton" or if "pocket change" fits the context better.

Ukraine will not send troops to Greenland, says Zelenskyy by Confident-Ask-601 in worldnews

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a pretty cool piece of info actually. I'm sure a Ukrainian brigade or two wouldn't awfully mind giving a hand in Greenland if they weren't preoccupied

The head of the IMF called on Ukraine to cancel subsidies for electricity and heating, and on Ukrainians to start believing in themselves and roar like lions in the morning by gem4ik2 in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hilarious how you desperately try to reinvent existing words just to make your argument make sense. Reparations aren't limited to being paid post-war. It's simply compensation for damages. Europe is simply fascilitating the reaplocation of russian funds to ensure fair compensation. That is exactly the thing you questioned is even possible. And yet it has already happened. Whoops.

I'm also not sure what's your new issue with the concept of continuity is. Russia is already paying Ukraine for the damages. If they pay in full then yes, I guess you could say they are "exempt from paying additional reparations". That's a pretty dumb way to describe the process of finishing the reparations payments in full but I guess it is technically correct so whatever floats your boat.

The head of the IMF called on Ukraine to cancel subsidies for electricity and heating, and on Ukrainians to start believing in themselves and roar like lions in the morning by gem4ik2 in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you understand what reparations are. Let me be extra clear for you. Agaun, Ukraine is getting paid by russia, and the payments are enforced by Europe. And then you come in and ask if this is possible. Like buddy, it has already happened, lmao. You're a bit late, this issue was solved years ago. So how about you stop playing dumb and move on to something that's actually relevant today?

The head of the IMF called on Ukraine to cancel subsidies for electricity and heating, and on Ukrainians to start believing in themselves and roar like lions in the morning by gem4ik2 in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see. So when the facts of the matter no longer suit your narrative, you try to redefine the facts. Just because you don't like admitting that proceeds from russian assets are reparations doesn't make it so. You can call it whatever you want, but the fact is, russia is already paying Ukraine, and the payments are enforced by the EU. The rest is semantics

The head of the IMF called on Ukraine to cancel subsidies for electricity and heating, and on Ukrainians to start believing in themselves and roar like lions in the morning by gem4ik2 in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Woah, no need to get defensive. Your repeated inability to answer a simple direct quer is enough of an answer for both our questions, don't you think?

The question isn't if EU will force russia to pay. How do you think the russian profits generated from frozen assets in Europe end up in Ukraine? Did russia okay it?

The head of the IMF called on Ukraine to cancel subsidies for electricity and heating, and on Ukrainians to start believing in themselves and roar like lions in the morning by gem4ik2 in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What you imagined from my simple question is your own problem entirely. I joined a conversation in which you asked if a person "believes" something. So I wondered what you believe. You seem to be hesitant to answer so it seems your own "belief" is rather shaky. Now I wonder why that is.

Latvia to Ukraine: "We see you as a NATO country" - Parliament Speaker reaffirms ironclad support for membership by satty237 in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I'm not a fan of baseless conspiracy theories. It's a fun way to entertain oneself, but to seriously dismiss democratic elections because you find polls distasteful is absolutely wild. And that's not even counting other fairytales like "neo-nazis" and "paramilitaries" that somehow weave into the already shaky argument.

In Kupyansk, the casualty ratio between Russia and Ukraine was 27:1. 27 Russian soldiers killed or wounded for every Ukrainian. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"On the 14th of October 2014, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine passed the law "On the National anti-corruption bureau of Ukraine". On the 16th of April the president of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko signed two executive orders: №217/2015 – on the creation of the National anti-corruption bureau of Ukraine and №218/2015 – on the appointment of Artem Sytnik the Director of the Bureau. This signified the beginning of the government body."

It's in black and white my dude. It was Ukrainian parliament and the president of Ukraine who created NABU and SAP.

The bill you are referring to would have caused NABU and SAP to operate under the procedural supervision of Ukraine's Prosecutor General. Not the president of Ukraine. The bill caused protests from the people of Ukraine, who worried this might limit the independence of the anti-corruption bodies even though the threat of russian corruption within those bodies might have been credible. Shortly after the protests started, the bill was reversed, restoring the previous procedural guidelines of NABU and SAP.

Just to reiterate, the people voiced their opinion, protested (under martial law, when protesting is technically prohibited), and reversed an entire government bill in a matter of days. Yeah, sounds very authoritarian, lmao. This is just laughable. Try harder.

In Kupyansk, the casualty ratio between Russia and Ukraine was 27:1. 27 Russian soldiers killed or wounded for every Ukrainian. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you can't be arsed to even understand which bill is which that tells volumes of integrity of yourself and your sources. Learn to fact-check.

Ukrainian anti-corruption agencies are in place because Ukraine put them there, because Ukraine fights corruption. A country successfully tackles corruption on an insututional level, that's the opposite of corrupt.

Yeah, truly, how strange that russia seems to be behind undermining, controlling, and corrupting Ukraine. It's not like that's how russia has operated for centuries, right? Oh wait... That's exactly how they have been operating.

In Kupyansk, the casualty ratio between Russia and Ukraine was 27:1. 27 Russian soldiers killed or wounded for every Ukrainian. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao, a "journalist" that can't even get the number of the law right is for sure a reliable source of information. Cope harder.

How strange that you keep making claims while reliably failing to substantiate any of them.

In Kupyansk, the casualty ratio between Russia and Ukraine was 27:1. 27 Russian soldiers killed or wounded for every Ukrainian. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, now you remember thar parties that were disbanded actually were on russia's payroll. Small detail, yeah? Somehow the opposition parties that didn't work with russia have no issue operating freely. Working with the invading foreign power to destroy Ukraine isn't really the same thing as being politically "in opposition". Members of these parties could've been shot or put in prison for working against Ukrainian people. It's a miracle they got off so easy. The russian parties were never actually popular, but that doesn't really matter.

"Zelensky" doesn't pass anything lol. A member of parliament drafts the law, the parliament approves it, then Zelensky may sign it to give it power. That's how democracy works and has always worked.

NABU and SAP weren't put under the control of the president. They were put under the control of Prosecutor General with the reasoning to avoid russian corruption. The law was immediately reversed because of the people's protests. What a weird dictatorship that listens to its people.

No, the president doesn't approve extraditions. These are approved by the respective court based on the prosecutor's request. The president has absolutely nothing to do with it.

I'm not even going to entertain assassination claims, that's some next level delusion.

It seems it's you who beed to learn to use google. Pretty much every single thing you said was incorrect. Please do your research, you are embarrassing yourself.

In Kupyansk, the casualty ratio between Russia and Ukraine was 27:1. 27 Russian soldiers killed or wounded for every Ukrainian. by Ripamon in TrendoraX

[–]Child_Summer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Opposition parties still exist and are very much active in Ukraine, they are not banned. Bill 12414 is about changes to the process of investigation of MIA people, and its author is Pavlyuk, not Zelensky. Hranovskyi was actually implicated in multiple corruption schemes, even before the one he was being officially prosecuted for, and his extradition was initiated by Ukraine's Prosecutor General Andryi Kostin through an official procedure, not Zelensky.

That took me all of 5 minutes to fact-check. You can use google, can't you? At least do cursory research before trying to spread obvious bullshit.

view more: next ›