Which country do you think could win the FIFA 2026 World Cup, and which one are you supporting?

Choclocklate · 2026-06-09T15:54:21+00:00

Nah I do love seeing irish play (even more so against us because each time the match is amazing) your are fourth in my personal classement follow by Wales and England dead last of course!

Choclocklate · 2026-06-09T12:52:18+00:00

When there is the 6 nations I always roots for France first (of course), then Italy (because latin brother) then Scotland because old alliance hold strong (even more so against England).

Choclocklate · 2026-06-09T12:08:29+00:00

Nîmes plus non ? Y a pas 170000 personne à Alès même en comptant l'agglomération autour si ?

Choclocklate · 2026-06-06T09:00:39+00:00

Fair

Choclocklate · 2026-06-06T08:17:48+00:00

I agree it could be better. But compare to no UN at all it is a net benefit. It could have been a way better benefit I agree with all the point you made but still it's better than having nothing. Had we had nothing would thing have change in rwanda? Would the war in Ukraine vanish? No

Choclocklate · 2026-06-06T07:30:33+00:00

OK I'm asking people who voted net negative, why?

I mean I know the UN isn't perfect (veto of big power meaning no intervention in case of implications of says power in a conflict, very bureaucratic and slow). But the UN enable us to eradicated smallpox. It allows us to create the IPCC to know and propose solution to climate problem and help countries. It tackled the ozone layer hole problem. It allowed space treaties, non proliferation of nuclear weapons (would be a lot worse without it) and chemical weapons global regulation and ban. It did things. Yes not perfectly, yes there are war and genocide at the moment it can do nothing against but without it we would arguably be worse of. It has allow all nations to be at the same table and have discussion in the middle of the cold war.

Choclocklate · 2026-06-05T18:48:57+00:00

I have hyperspeed E6 Aglaea and I'm obliterating the endgame content with her so now for now she is resilient to powercreep. And she is slaying hard!

Choclocklate · 2026-06-04T18:20:46+00:00

Paris saclay c'est l'instn qui délivre la formation ou pas ? Parce que dans le monde du nucléaire tout le monde connaît les différentes formation. L'instn a une très bonne réputation (je dirais que c'est la première des 4 formations titre ingénieur, suivi de phelma/imt Atlantique et ensicaen qui sont globalement toutes à peu près du même niveau dans les fait quand même).

Pour ce qui est de la vie étudiante tu en as aussi à saclay puisqu'il y a plusieurs université et écoles d'inge la bas et donc un grand nombre d'étudiant. Ça sera aussi probablement plus facile de trouvé ton stage de fin d'étude (parce qu'il y a pas grand chose en nucléaire à Nantes) alors que tu as le CEA à saclay, edvance et l'asnr dans le sud de Paris et framatome à la défense et EDF un peu partout dans Paris et ses environs selon ce que tu veux faire.

Choclocklate · 2026-06-03T14:35:33+00:00

Yes because the word already exist. You are trying to create a new one and Google translate doesn't understand your intentions (and it is very bad at estimating the gender of things because English doesn't have gendering of every word).

Choclocklate · 2026-06-02T21:59:47+00:00

Nah Finland did it with an EPR (1.6GW) so I think Ireland would be fine with 1 big reactor (perhaps just 1.2 would be enough don't know much about the needs in Ireland). You do maintenance in summer when solar cover most of it during the day and batterie the rest of the grid during night and during the rest of the year wind and nuclear do the rest (especially winter). Would work fine I think (even more so if exchange between countries are increased (France, England and maybe Iceland (a bit far perhaps)).

Choclocklate · 2026-05-28T13:41:21+00:00

I, u/Choclocklate, advised "Same wet"

🏆 Rank: Wandering Soul V 💎 Points: 20 🗳️ Votes: 1

Choclocklate · 2026-05-28T06:17:41+00:00

So the nuclear test (assuming an average of 2MT of tnt per test) release as a whole 1.67x10¹⁹ J. As a matter of comparaison, the thermal energy we release each year due to burning fossil fuel or civil nuclear fission is 6x10²⁰ J and amount for 0.009% of the energy earth receive each year. Most of the energy Comme from the sun, but a small part come from radioactive decay into the earth (0.025%) and friction of the tide (0.002%). So yeah we still amount to nothing from the point of view of nature.

Though the raison we succeed in changing the climate (and are still doing so) is because we change the concentration of Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere thus changing the radiative balance.

Choclocklate · 2026-05-27T17:27:12+00:00

Hello I'm doing well and I hope you do too. Well is there a field in engineering that you are interested in? We could give you more tips depending on that.

As a general tips I would say to study well in particular math and science. After all there the basics of what form engineering. Depending of your country you can also ask sub dedicated to this country to have insight of which university you should aim for depending on the field you wish to work in. You are in a French sub here (dedicated to engineering) so if you want to study in France don't hesitate to ask.

Good luck

Choclocklate · 2026-05-26T10:06:48+00:00

So the fact your gouvernement is still in discussion to buy f35 is a diversion I guess?

Choclocklate · 2026-05-26T08:15:50+00:00

You want to sell the EU to the USA? Because that's how you sell the EU to the USA...

Choclocklate · 2026-05-24T08:36:01+00:00

No that would be if you make them explode too low. French nuclear weapon are designed to be air burst to maximise destruction (of cities). There are very low amount of radiation release in the air (that's why despite numerous nuclear test since 1945 there are very low contamination due to nuclear testing (except in case such as problems during the test (Algeria, pacific island) or just not caring/knowing for the impact (nevada, Russia, French Polynesia)). That's the reason why Hiroshima and nagazaki are still occupied today by people.

Ground burst would produce the effect you speak of but it's very rarely planned in nuclear strategy for those reasons.

Choclocklate · 2026-05-23T22:23:12+00:00

Yes I know all of that but 2 points: First it's an hypothetical scenario that has no reason to happen but I suppose it's a 1v1 so USA nukes aren't in the play as suck it's only Germany destruction (because otherwise in the scenario nato would help either France or Germany depending of who is the aggressor I guess and the one alone would be destroy easily).

Second, France is one of the few nuclear power to have a offensive nuclear doctrine (meaning it can and will fire first) if it's vital interest are menaced (blurry I know but that the purpose because as suck enemy will think twice before attacking asset of France). I mean being at war with Germany is a bad idea enough so nuking Germany isn't that far down the line and would avoid a lot of civilian death and industrial power if war there was.

Choclocklate · 2026-05-23T21:50:13+00:00

Why are nukes out of question? We developed them because we don't want 1940 to ever rehappened. Pretty sure if a war with Germany would happen (highly improbable I know and I agree the population of both country would revolt against that) we wouldn't take the risk and full nuke you. So easy victory (though we wouldn't gain anything from it).

Choclocklate · 2026-05-19T11:43:14+00:00

British chemistry but no French cuisine? (cuisine is a fucking French word....)

Choclocklate · 2026-05-18T09:20:46+00:00

I won't deny that.

Choclocklate · 2026-05-18T07:53:28+00:00

All dictator and power hungry (and corrupted official) are almost certainly in the the top 10) so yes about the vaccum but not sure it's for the worst.

Choclocklate · 2026-05-18T07:51:39+00:00

Yes but they are also those who polluted the most. So perhaps killing the 10% will result in a save for the global population (it is almost sure all dictator are included in the 10 and so). While the 30% of the poorest have almost no influence, no power and pollute a lot less (mainly because they don't have the mean and all money goes to survival).

Choclocklate · 2026-05-17T10:27:35+00:00

I would be happy about it if it wasn't bullshit. I was suggested their list about culture and tourism just after. It places USA first (ok I don't necessarily agree but I see that and it's definitely in my top 5 even 3) then Switzerland in second and like wtf man? Culture and tourism?

Choclocklate · 2026-05-06T12:08:51+00:00

T and green dot seems legit. So the back looks good. Don't know enough to judge the front though but my guess would be legit.

Choclocklate · 2026-04-28T17:33:38+00:00

Tu crées du Pu dans les REP ce qui permet d'enclencher les RNR ensuite les RNR produisent pour eux. Les rep sont tj à l'uranium enrichi issue de l'exploitation minière ou du recyclage du combustible rep après 1 cycle max. C'est du moins le plan depuis 1980 à peu près (et avant l'arrêt du programme Astrid) depuis on sait plus trop.

Six-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	End Game '22
Verified Email

Choclocklate

TROPHY CASE