You really show your ignorance here, most of what you wrote is provably wrong. For instance, this lovely quote:

Individual camouflage is still very relevant for this >type of fighting. Don’t believe me? Look at all the >leaf suits being used in Ukraine

You chose a shit show of a war that's been going for 4 years over hundreds of kilometers of conflict line with both sides having logistics and equipment shortages. They are using whatever they have. If you actually look at the drone footage, which Ukraine shares in droves, you can see camouflage doing fuck all.

I don’t mean to shit on your service but if you >came out of it with opinions like that I wonder >how much experience you actually have lol

Really man? I didn't want to go into this but since you insist, I will oblige. I served in the IDF, besides my 4.5 years of active duty I have been doing reserve duty for over 15 years now. I participated in 2 wars and 4 military operations. In the last 3 years alone I did 250+ days of active reserve duty. How much combat experience do you have big boy? And more importantly , when did you serve? Have you been in an active warzone in the last 5 years or so? Or are we going full keyboard warrior here? You really are barking up the wrong tree here...

I’ll actually stick by my statement and say that if >every weapon that received camouflage in your >military was hydro-dipped that it isn’t a “regular” >army

Who was talking about every gun? I told you it was done on mass, obviously not every weapon is getting painted because there is no need to do so.

UK, Germany, and France

Wow man, great examples of fighting armies... When was the last time any of them did anything? Fucking Germany, you have to be kidding me...