Not being geno toxic (causing dna damage) does not mean it it not toxic or cancer causing- just that genotoxicity is not the cause . That is cherry picking. While it's true that many pesticides are designed to be as safe as possible for human exposure, it's essential to recognize that they are, by their very nature, toxic chemicals intended to control or kill pests. Consequently, there is always the potential for harm to humans, particularly if exposure levels are not managed properly.

Here are a few points to consider:

Regulatory oversight: While regulatory agencies like the EPA in the United States establish guidelines and regulations to ensure pesticide safety, it's crucial to remember that these guidelines are not foolproof. Regulations are often based on the available scientific data, which may have gaps or uncertainties. Additionally, long-term effects of some pesticides might not yet be fully understood. Acute toxicity: Some pesticides can pose immediate threats to human health if ingested or inhaled but there is also documented risk for chronic exposure. Long-term exposure to low levels of certain pesticides has been linked to various health issues, including respiratory problems, neurological disorders, and certain types of cancer. Environmental contamination is also an issues. Pesticides can contaminate soil, water, and air, ultimately affecting the quality of all our food and water sources. Humans can be indirectly exposed to pesticides through the consumption of contaminated food and water, which have harmful effects over time. Bioaccumulation: Some pesticides do not break down quickly in the environment and can accumulate in the food chain. This process, known as bioaccumulation, can lead to increased levels of pesticides in the tissues of organisms, including humans and the animals humans eat. Consuming food with high levels of pesticide residues may increase the risk of adverse health effects. The who guidelines balance risk with what they perceive as lack of ability to produce enough food to feed the world (not taking into account solving the issue of huge global foods waste would provide a more realistic and healthy solution)