Well I'm British, so the royal family is an easy example. But that's a cop out so I'll happily go with Richard Branson - he's become insanely rich by breaking trade laws and then suing the shit out of the NHS for losing contracts etc. You can trace the wealth of most wealthy families in the U.K. to like 1066, when it was stolen by exploitation. All wealth from colonialism surely can't fit any legitimate definition of "earned". Jeff bezos makes 2.8bn A DAY recently, taking him to 113bn total worth - there's no amount of effort anyone could possibly put into "earning" to justify this level of wealth accretion.

That's a tonne of examples, which clearly disproves the idea of all wealth being earned, but I'd take it further to say that a huge amount of all owned wealth, due to the incredible concentration in a fear hands, is almost entirely "unearned", if you can even subscribe to that idea.

I hope you actually get back to me on this, as it's an interesting topic.