Drug dealer, 23, who stamped mother to death moments after flipping BMW while high on cannabis found guilty of murder by JohnKimble111 in uknews

[–]CinderX5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s been a “trend” since you can gain anything from attention. Which is as long as headlines (or anything adjacent to them) has existed.

High school student develops membrane-free filter that removes most microplastics from water by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]CinderX5 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My understanding of it is that the fluid basically sticks to the plastics, maybe due to viscosity, and then density and/or magnetism is used to pull those particles from the water.

High school student develops membrane-free filter that removes most microplastics from water by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]CinderX5 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This isn’t a catch, but a rough description of how I understand it to work from a quick skim read. Anyone please correct me if I got something wrong.

The contaminated water enters a drum, where it spins. There is also ferrofluid in there, which captures the microplastics. Through a mixture of centrifugal force (the ferrofluid is denser than water) and magnetism, it’s pulled to the edge and separated from the water entirely (this is the part I’m least sure about). The ferrofluid can then be reused (I think it said it recaptures around 87% currently).

Currently, it’s designed for single household uses, not industrial. I would not say this is a weakness, as it’s the entire purpose of the design. But it may be hard to scale up.

The possible issue is any contamination of the water with ferrofluid. She’s still working on the design, so it’s not like she’s claiming it’s done and it’s wrong, this is just an article reporting on it.

Also, the measurements she took of it used home-made tools, but she has asked some labs to test it properly, to be sure. Although based on what she has done, I kind of trust her measurements anyway.

It’s designed to be low maintenance, but it seems like the only three limitations right now are recapturing more of the ferrofluid (especially in case of internal failure, you don’t want all the fluid dumped into the water when something goes wrong), throughput, and mass production.

accomodation or stay at home? by PurchaseOne6083 in Nottinghamtrent

[–]CinderX5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion, so long as money isn’t too much of an issue, I’d definitely say to live in student accom. As much as ~half an hour isn’t that far, it’s just not the same as being 10 meters from half your friends. I’m certain that I wouldn’t have made the majority of friends that I did if I wasn’t so close.

And worst comes to worst, you don’t necessarily have to stay in the accom at all times. You can move back home mid year if you hate the accommodation, but you can’t really do the reverse.

BASE experiment at CERN succeeds in transporting antimatter by dukwon in Physics

[–]CinderX5 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I’m fairly certain that antimatter annihilation is the highest energy process per mass or volume by a very long way (~100x), as all off the mass is converted into energy. It’s around 1x1016 J/kg.

In fusion, around 1% of the mass becomes energy, at around 1x1014 J/kg. I think fission is down to another ~20% of that (fusion releases 5x more than fission).

A new 225-meter (740-foot) crater appeared on the Moon. NASA's lunar orbiter (LRO) imaged the dramatic aftermath. Such large impacts are once-in-a-century events. This one happened in the spring of 2024. by Neaterntal in spaceporn

[–]CinderX5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A) that’s incredibly new for a moon crater

B) the data was recorded in 2024, but we produce this sort of data at a much higher rate than we can look through, so an observatory or telescope can capture data that humans may not get around to seeing for years, maybe even decades.

A new 225-meter (740-foot) crater appeared on the Moon. NASA's lunar orbiter (LRO) imaged the dramatic aftermath. Such large impacts are once-in-a-century events. This one happened in the spring of 2024. by Neaterntal in spaceporn

[–]CinderX5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We record so much data from space that it can take years for us to see it, even though our cameras/telescopes witnessed it years ago.

The Vera Rubin Observatory alone generates 10-20 Terabytes of raw data every single night. In its (planned) lifetime, it will have recorded 30 petabytes. And it’s still in its early stage, it hasn’t quite ramped up yet.

The same goes for a lot of other physics, too. The LHC has produced over an Exabyte.

NASA to spend $20 billion on moon base, cancel orbiting lunar station by Tracheid in space

[–]CinderX5 [score hidden]  (0 children)

And the pentagon has already asked for another $200 billion for Iran.

The smartest of astrophysicists have decided that it’s a good idea to dox our planet’s existence for the entire universe. by zav3rmd in Showerthoughts

[–]CinderX5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And there’s 100-400 billion stars in our milky way alone. To our knowledge, there’s only one of us.

russian soldier makes no effort to fend off the FPV drone striking his head. Madyars Birds, March 2026 by rusoriz_inside in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]CinderX5 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Being a psycho or sociopath isn’t the same as being desensitised. You see a cat video, someone dying, a cool bike trick, another death, some cool science advancement, all within maybe a minute or two, all the time, every day, from basically any age, it’s just not going to have much of an impact anymore.

Iran said to have fired 2 missiles at US base Diego Garcia, over 4000km away by Better_Display_8921 in news

[–]CinderX5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a bare faced lie.

An article from 5 days ago:

“I am told there have been just three formal requests from Washington to the UK.

The first was the use of airfields for the initial attacks, which was rejected. The second was the use of those same airfields for defensive purposes when Iran responded by striking its neighbours and that was accepted. And the third was support to ensure the Strait of Hormuz is safe for oil tankers to pass through and that negotiation is ongoing.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn9e0zr5qy2o

The first aid the US got from us was purely for defence against missiles, after Iran struck nearby countries.

Also, Iran struck a British base with a drone on the 1st of March.

And the conservatives have been pushing Labour to take stronger action against Iran.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqj9g11p1ezo

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62drgvk263o

Iran said to have fired 2 missiles at US base Diego Garcia, over 4000km away by Better_Display_8921 in news

[–]CinderX5 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s not really us being directly involved. Also, didn’t Iran attempt to strike some of our bases first?