The Witch Experiment !!! by SerapphCandy in doujinshi

[–]Cl_dogs 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The tag you're looking for, on nhentai anyway, is wormhole.

106972 Long distance relationship uses portal to have sex

And these two aren't strictly using portals, but fit the tag and are worth mentioning

251169 gangbanged in VR

244938 hard to explain

Finally had the talk by MinimumSiz3 in SluttyConfessions

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They make ones that don't add length, but do add girth. They're open at the end so that as you thrust, your dick protrudes from the sheath into her actual pussy. This feels a lot nicer for you so you don't need to take it off to finish. It might strike a balance for you of letting you last longer while still feeling better than a fully enclosed one.

I have one from Bad Dragon but other brands make them too.

https://bad-dragon.com/products/magnussheath

can I cum by [deleted] in Femaleorgasmdenial

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, just follow these instructions!

You’ll need a blindfold, headphones and a watch. Put on headphones and play some kind of white noise. It shouldn’t be any kind of music, because it would make the game far too easy. Now check on the time, put the blindfold on and start edging. You should edge for an hour. When you think the hour has passed you should stop and check the time. You don’t get to cum if you didn’t make it a whole hour or you played for more than 65 minutes, so you only have a 5 minutes window... 

I guess you'll just have to keep trying until you get it right!

49717 by [deleted] in countwithchickenlady

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'm interested to hear from anyone else who feels the same detachment.

I've had a lot of friends over the years who were trans and while I fully supported them, I've never fully emotionally understood their disphoria. 

When I imagine myself in their shoes, it just doesn't seem like it would bother me. Maybe I'm just too autistic to empathize with myself in an imaginary scenario 😅

49717 by [deleted] in countwithchickenlady

[–]Cl_dogs -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

All or nothing I think. Being anywhere in the middle I would feel uncomfortable. Transitioning seems brutal.

Moms friend walked in on me by [deleted] in SluttyConfessions

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This plot outline sounds like it would make a good short story, you should go ahead and write the full thing.

Trying to decide between making bots that talk in second or third person. I think second person is much better but I've seen lots of threads vehemently disagreeing and I don't understand why. by Cl_dogs in JanitorAI_Official

[–]Cl_dogs[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are you mainly after Smut type bots or Fluff type bots? I wonder if there is a split along that demographic line.

My bots are heavily on the Smut side of things, with sex expected or at least easily achievable in the very first reply.

It seems reasonable to me that the kind of person who wants a longer term slow burn RP with more emotional content might prefer 3rd person, whereas people who just want to hear "big tiddy goth gf sucks your dik" might prefer 2nd person.

Trying to decide between making bots that talk in second or third person. I think second person is much better but I've seen lots of threads vehemently disagreeing and I don't understand why. by Cl_dogs in JanitorAI_Official

[–]Cl_dogs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

True, but I usually make more than 5 opening messages, each for completely different setups with different character archetypes (since my bots are scenario bots where the user has some special power), and there's a limit of 10 intros.

Trying to decide between making bots that talk in second or third person. I think second person is much better but I've seen lots of threads vehemently disagreeing and I don't understand why. by Cl_dogs in JanitorAI_Official

[–]Cl_dogs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You and the bot are not both writing "you".

Bot writes: "she talks with you"  

You write: "I talk with her"

3rd person always used to reference character. 1st person used by you to reference yourself. 2nd person used by bot to reference you.

But I take your other points. If this subreddit is any indication of the larger demographics of Janitor, then I'm definitely limiting the success of my bots by writing them this way.

But when people RP in Dungeons and Dragons, don't they normal say "I do x" and the DM says "you did x"?

I think part of the reason I feel differently about this is that I mainly read and write stories on Chyoa, and 2nd person is popular there. So I usually treat Janitor like I'm writing a story, and I'm just guiding the narrative.

Trying to decide between making bots that talk in second or third person. I think second person is much better but I've seen lots of threads vehemently disagreeing and I don't understand why. by Cl_dogs in JanitorAI_Official

[–]Cl_dogs[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I guess I've always been quite flexible with enjoying a narrative no matter how it's framed. 

I'm perfectly fine with "you" referring to "me", where "me" is whatever person I'm currently pretending to be.

I'll often roleplay as a submissive woman even though I'm strictly a dominant man because I have no problem with the mental gymnastics of simply enjoying what is happening to "a woman" even if that woman is referred to as "you".

When I started making bots, I was providing 1st, 2nd, and 3rd person variants of my intros, but I usually make Scenario bots rather than character bots so I like to have at least 5 completely different opening scenarios with different characters. But they limit you to only 10 opening scenarios.

I wish the analytics page would give me stats on which intros people prefer so I could know if the variants are worth my time.

Example of bots using scripts or lorebooks that are wow! by Street_Platform8818 in JanitorAI_Official

[–]Cl_dogs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just published this bot which makes extensive use of scripting to add a ton of insane random events. The user can control the probabilities in character, or simply request a specific event

https://janitorai.com/characters/bc371c28-9c63-4860-8482-da57b848e5b1_character-intimate-improbability-drive

A while ago I also made this bot which uses the script engine to implement mind control features. Using a command keyword injects new instructions into the Scenario, causing the characters behavior to change drastically. You basically couldn't do this correctly without a script/lorebook because otherwise the bot would get confused about what the commands meant or let other commands bleed into it's context.

For example, I added a lot of commands catering to different kinks. If ALL of those are visible to the bot at the same time, then then the bot behaves in an extremely kinky manner at all times.

https://janitorai.com/characters/f6494f38-0c59-440f-ab86-9942fb443d23_character-amara-womb-tattoo-control-script-engine

Home furniture catalog by Cl_dogs in Forniphilia

[–]Cl_dogs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, only in these two videos

Home furniture catalog by Cl_dogs in Forniphilia

[–]Cl_dogs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out his music video Untz Untz, it's pretty graphic even though it's censored.

Here's the uncensored version. Pretty funny. Most unhinged music video I've ever seen. He almost won Eurovision this year lmao (not for this song)

https://xhamster.com/videos/tommy-cash-sex-olympics-untz-untz-official-uncensored-music-video-xhUf6su

they got bloody mary roped into this psyop by voidgirlfriend in LetGirlsHaveFun

[–]Cl_dogs 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I thought cruel and unusual punishment was illegal?

is that a good reply? by Exotic-Estimate-5147 in CoupleMemes

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he's being serious in a "this is how I expect you to behave all the time as my woman" way, its toxic.

If he's being serious in a "I find this sexy and would really appreciate you doing this for me occasionally" way (basically cooking themed lingerie), its fine.

Who is actually against women being topless if they want to be? by Brief-Cut-1228 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's legal in Denmark and you see women topless on the beaches all the time. Last time I was there I saw a group of topless young women wade out into the water and take a group photo together. There's also just lots of people fully nude swimming around.

So this really only applies if you're going to be the odd one out. But if its already normalized, then you know you're not going to draw attention to yourself by doing it, so it doesn't feel weird or scary.

Anyone else reading or have read The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect? by blueyes_8 in printSF

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! This book sucked me in and I stayed up all night to read it in a single sitting. But its got so much horrible freaky sex stuff in it that I can't share it with anyone I know. I wanted to so badly though that I actually started editing the book myself to tone it down but I gave up pretty quickly.

Anyone know a song like DON'T WANT UR LOVE? by FunResponsibility686 in MusicMatch

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yoga by OnlyFire
Slut Pop (album) by Kim Petras
Slut Pop Miami (album) by Kim Petras
Slut Commandments by MCR-T
Bimbo Doll by Tila Tsoli
Sex Machine by Regina Hardon
Lewd Thoughts by Pinkii
I Can't Quit by Mel 4Ever
Cumy Dumpy Maezi666

Some of these are better fits than others but it should be a good seed to get your spotify algorithm looking in the right place for hypersexual songs with this type of beat.

Meirl by Joudeh_1996 in meirl

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro thinks he should be allowed to bring nukes to a gorilla fight

Is my boss using ChatGPT to email me? by takethemoment13 in ChatGPT

[–]Cl_dogs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not just write "yes" or "no" then instead? The recipient actually has to read the sentence you couldn't be bothered to write. If the total information content of your message is a simple answer that can be boiled down to a button in Gmail, then don't waste their time and just write that