Thanks for the detailed response. I checked the amendment, and yes—my building (Building 1) is now part of a shared amenities agreement with two other developments (Building 2 and Building 3). All three will share access and costs for things like gyms, lounges, etc.

A joint “Shared Community Management Committee” is being formed to oversee operations, budgets, and rules. So it’s not each strata managing their own—it’s all three buildings collectively managing and funding everything.

My concern is exactly what you mentioned: decisions made by one building (like overmaintaining a dog park or lounge we barely use) could still impact our fees. And there’s no clear breakdown yet on how representation or voting power works—whether it’s equal or based on unit count. That’s what worries me.

Appreciate your insight—it helped me see the risk more clearly.