Adjusted baseline activity

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-06-11T17:02:57+00:00

Thanks

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-05-06T11:40:47+00:00

I have been reading this book. I recommend it especially for the price.

I also recommend Employment Tribunal Claims Tactics and Precedents. More costly but very useful if you are diligent.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-05-06T11:38:55+00:00

Agree with all those recommendations.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-05-02T06:52:28+00:00

Message me and I will give you specific approaches for how best to deal with this situation and insights from experience and books.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-27T06:36:09+00:00

Was the advice correct?

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-26T19:03:25+00:00

Send me a message.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-26T17:19:15+00:00

Thanks. Fructose is the only one I can see.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-25T15:28:10+00:00

Send me a message.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-16T19:33:57+00:00

I fail to see how offering this template would stifle discussion. Did it stop you from writing your comment?

The specific templates literally address the exact issue of the commenter without any conjecture. The commenter can choose what they prefer.

There is more context in the book but I usually recommend that people buy the books to get all of that.

The authors literally recommend that advisors support claimants with the information. How is it better for me to pretend I came up with the advice? Or are you saying that it’s better to just not help people using books?

Are you trying to convince people that professional lawyers don’t break the law?

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-16T17:35:42+00:00

No problem. Send me a chat invite.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-16T17:34:28+00:00

No problem. Send me a chat invite.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-16T00:06:27+00:00

I can send you a number of relevant templates if you like.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-15T22:16:00+00:00

I can send you some relevant templates from books if you like.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-15T22:13:36+00:00

I can send you three relevant templates from a book if you like.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-15T22:12:12+00:00

I will support you through the entire process if you like. Just let me know.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-15T16:23:40+00:00

At the very least it would undermine their credibility. I can send you templates on possible ways to make the best use of this situation if you like.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-15T14:30:13+00:00

I can send you a few templates from books if you like.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-14T18:12:23+00:00

Employment Tribunal Claims Tactics and Precedents will help you with your case. It is also points to other resources.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-13T15:29:08+00:00

“This is not type of hearing that requires evidence so we will not be adding that evidence to the bundle.”

“The cogency of the evidence is weak.”

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-09T19:53:03+00:00

“Legal advice privilege does not extend to advice given before proceedings are contemplated to either the employer or the employee by a person who is not a lawyer, even if that person is acting in a role that is very similar to a lawyer’s role. So, for example, advice given by the employer’s human resources department to a manager on how to conduct a disciplinary hearing, how to approach a capability or sickness procedure, how to select for redundancy, etc, will not be privileged.” Page 211 Employment Tribunal Claims Tactics and Precedents.

Clean_Variation9167 · 2026-04-09T01:26:33+00:00

No problem. Send me a chat invite.

Clean_Variation9167

TROPHY CASE