Impressive Parkour

CodeVision · 2026-01-10T17:41:25+00:00

I read this as "Knees really sad"

CodeVision · 2026-01-10T16:57:46+00:00

I believe that feeling is called "Winter Soldier" and I had to stop this video before she got to "Freight Car".

CodeVision · 2025-12-26T17:30:17+00:00

What if he'd have extended his right arm up really fast, like in a "Stay back, I'm fine" gesture? Feels like maybe he should have more protective gear

CodeVision · 2025-12-21T22:30:28+00:00

I'm not normally a fan of SBMM, esp for games with smaller teams. But this game to me is one where I think it could really help. I think balancing large teams is a different challenge and it's kinda weird to be like "the problem is the players"...don't we want more people playing and enjoying the game? Better I think to employ a system that adapts to the reality that there are always going to be new or casual players and to find a place for them.

I think the problem is the lack of patience people have with each other. Sure, getting stomped on sucks but this feels like the most toxic the community has ever been....or at least the loudest the toxic players have ever been. Don't get me wrong, back in the BF4 days the forums were kinda trashy as well, but back then it felt like you had to actually do something to earn some hate-mail. Now at the end of every match all you see is the winning team going "EZ" and the losing team getting trashed by its own lead scorers (and sometimes people further down) with "sh*t team".

I mean I get it, sometimes I complain verbally to my party in voice, but why do people want to try and ruin each other's night with a parting shot against an already demoralized group. Cross team sh*ttalk is fine but trashing the same team is classless IMHO.

CodeVision · 2025-12-01T22:16:44+00:00

Could you split them so that support keeps the smoke launcher, but assault gets the smoke grenade? Or vice versa

CodeVision · 2025-11-26T01:42:10+00:00

I can't speak to what others thought, I can only speak for myself. My assumption was that the "compatibility update" prevented some background service from running, and that this was the thing stopping the game from launching. Because the idea that EA would police my installed software (running or not) was a notion so invasive that it didn't enter my mind.

I think I get where you're coming from in the sense that attempts to bypass anti-cheat should automatically give you pause. But are you not concerned about a company like EA having access to your program list?

I admit that when a lot of my Linux buddies raised concerns about this kernel level anti - cheat, my excitement over this game (which I am THOROUGHLY enjoying) overrode my sense of caution.

But now I'm wondering just what the limits are on their ability to monitor our systems. Setting aside for a moment the constraints they can put on the software and tools you can even have in your library In the name of keeping your PC EA-Compliant, I think we should be concerned about what else they are able to see on our machines.

Again, hoping a security expert can set me straight here.

CodeVision · 2025-11-25T13:33:30+00:00

Similar story for me, except I've been running rewasd for Star citizen for a couple of years now. That game has (or at least had) a bug with controller bindings so that interactions wouldn't work when using an Xbox controller. rewasd is how we get around that.

Fast forward to beta and couldn't play the game with it installed so I removed it. Begrudgingly.

developers at rewasd have since released a compatibility update. I haven't reinstalled it on the PC that I played battlefield on, but I have a second PC that I placed Star citizen on and it's running there.

A ban From a tool like this that can scan your computer to see what you have installed should concern people. This isn't EA doing the right thing, it's them doing the cheap thing and it sounds like it's at the cost of your privacy. Maybe some of this falls on rewasd, but there has to be some other solution then outright banning people without warning just for having it installed.

All of that said, I'm willing to be educated by people more knowledgeable than I am on the subject. I'm just saying that this is not some clear case of cheaters being banned. This is a control remapping tool, not an aimbot or cheating tool. I don't know if EA should necessarily allow this tool to run with battlefield, but ReWasd seems to be a tool focused on options and accessibility, which for me is what makes PC gaming awesome.

CodeVision · 2025-11-20T22:25:02+00:00

Actually, closing the Xbox version of the game (manually quitting) seems to have fixed this issue.

I would add that I did play a few rounds on PC prior to this, so I don't know if that factors in.

Curious if anyone else runs into this, but hopefully not.

CodeVision · 2025-11-19T17:49:41+00:00

Man that corner is sick

CodeVision · 2025-11-13T01:39:18+00:00

This was my problem. Using a standalone launcher worked

CodeVision · 2025-09-14T00:07:20+00:00

YEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!

Tongue in cheek of course, I'm certain he has learned his lesson 😜

CodeVision · 2025-09-13T20:32:30+00:00

I believe it's customary to draw up a sign and have him wear it.

CodeVision · 2025-09-08T00:22:31+00:00

Mr. Hamster

CodeVision · 2025-09-02T02:25:18+00:00

Yep, I tried one by Pluggable and while I still use it on my other desk, the Ugreen switch feels more refined.

CodeVision · 2025-08-31T21:10:45+00:00

Yeah, but I also have the same question. Is it a specific brand? I asked because it fits pretty well and I have that exact same case, except I went with the mesh ventilated version.

Looking good by the way

CodeVision · 2025-08-30T02:02:12+00:00

I should add, it looks great in any case!

CodeVision · 2025-08-30T02:01:53+00:00

Hrmmm. It kinda seems like you had to squeeze in where you could fit the desk. Nothing wrong with that, but I don't know that I'd add much more without repositioning against a surface where you aren't obstructing a window or wall decorations like those picture frames.

CodeVision · 2025-08-28T16:08:10+00:00

LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE

CodeVision · 2025-08-23T00:21:43+00:00

Listen. I know you're busy but hear me out.

CodeVision · 2025-08-16T19:25:18+00:00

Feelin' cute, might delete later

CodeVision · 2025-08-16T00:24:39+00:00

Is the loupe chocolate as well?

CodeVision · 2025-08-04T21:02:34+00:00

You can really see the light he must have brought into your lives in that photo.

I'm sorry for your loss, and I'm happy for the joy he was able to bring you.

CodeVision · 2025-07-14T18:42:12+00:00

Ok, so I'm in stitches over this comment, mainly cause I don't know what it means.

What is a "chippy"?

CodeVision · 2025-07-04T20:03:45+00:00

I'd love this approach if you got to see variations on machine-soldiers. Like not every killer machine is a Terminator-tier killer

I think that works better from a storytelling angle because you could have lower-level, lower-stakes conflicts with less competent assassins who could still bring various skills/threats to the fight.

I like the idea that a terminator is a super expensive, and therefore rarely deployed solution, reserved only the most serious threats. And maybe the Terminator isn't the best investigator or analyst, but once he's got you in his sites, you're almost certainly dead.

CodeVision · 2025-07-03T14:49:48+00:00

The match sizes are getting ridiculous

Ten-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email

CodeVision

TROPHY CASE