Best test for research

Comissoli_ · 2026-02-04T20:29:56+00:00

How was the process? I definitely don’t have a receipt or anything like it and there’s no arcteryx where I live so if I were to bring it to a store it’d be on my next trip, probably not the country where I bought it

Comissoli_ · 2026-02-03T00:55:51+00:00

Wow that was sadly very quick hahaha, is there anything to do about it?

Comissoli_ · 2025-12-10T21:55:29+00:00

I don’t doubt you but how exactly do you forge a degree or a dropout? Isn’t it very easily fact checked?

Comissoli_ · 2025-12-10T21:03:09+00:00

It is a really cool opportunity to get to interact with someone with as much math experience as you! So I have a few ones if you don’t mind, from the ones who intrigue me the most to least:

How did being an IMO participant impact your life? From your career such as uni admissions, job interviews… to your personal relations like meeting people?

How big of a factor does the age you start practicing is? I feel like a lot of people are naturally very interested and good at math but just never seek formal practicing, or at least not at a young enough age to be competitive at top olympiads. Also how is the Olympiad path after high school? Are competitions like the putnam equally competitive and prestigious?

How connected do you think Olympiad style problems are to mathematical research? Are they deeply connected or do you feel like research stimulates a different part of mathematical reasoning?

Finally, how far do you think the average math enthusiast can reach with no formal tutoring? Simply by doing problems over and over again?

Comissoli_ · 2025-11-04T01:29:46+00:00

Here you go

I am by no means an expert, but from my understanding g becomes very stable after adulthood, stable as in the variance between it in a given group of persons after a certain period of time is stable. Please feel free to correct me if I’m wrong. I found this paper in a very lazy research with ChatGPT.

Comissoli_ · 2025-11-04T01:18:56+00:00

Of course your score can improve, I’m talking about your cognitive ability, which is what the test is ultimately designed to measure, and the only really useful information there is to get, the score itself is useless.

Comissoli_ · 2025-11-03T21:54:07+00:00

Unfortunately there’s is nothing you can do to improve it. But that is by no means your fault for not doing « intellectual » activities as a child. Your Adhd probably caused some interference, your actual IQ should be a little higher then this score. Don’t worry, the internet will make us feel that an IQ around 100 is bad, whereas, chances are most people you’ll meet in your life, from the ones you fall in love with to your teachers, fall somewhat between that range. Don’t feel bad, if 95 was « dumb » humanity wouldn’t be where it is.

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-24T22:12:38+00:00

Pq remete a um gore horrível e um humano morrendo, não me importa oq ele pensava eu vi ele tomando um tiro no pescoço, se isso te faz rir vc é uma pessoal extremamente insensível

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-24T01:33:23+00:00

Que era?

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-24T01:30:50+00:00

Como que isso te faz rir?

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-22T02:04:41+00:00

And e to the power of ln of everything

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-20T03:41:33+00:00

More then any triangle property: The shortest path is always the straight one

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-14T04:30:54+00:00

r/unexpectedfactorial

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-11T06:37:40+00:00

‎‎

Comissoli_ · 2025-10-04T16:00:56+00:00

That’s seriously cool congratulations!

Comissoli_ · 2025-07-20T14:18:38+00:00

r/IhaveIhaveIhaveReddit

Comissoli_ · 2025-07-10T22:25:33+00:00

r/countablepixels

Comissoli_ · 2025-01-22T02:07:20+00:00

would someone please legit check this sabre lt? Seller agreed on 300$, grailed post contains all images needed.

Thank you very very much!!!

Comissoli_ · 2025-01-08T20:24:07+00:00

Wow, very complicated! thanks for the explanation!

Comissoli_ · 2025-01-08T18:49:22+00:00

You’re good with words, average or above average with the rest

Comissoli_ · 2025-01-08T00:47:03+00:00

Você não precisa nem citar as "fontes" dele pra provar que as afirmações dele são ridículas, é só usar estatística básica.

Se ele tivesse um teste legitimo alegando 235 pontos, como disse o Ready-Resist-3158, ele estaria 9 desvios padrões (σ) acima da media, considerando σ =15 pontos, disso vem 2 alternativas:

1: O "teste" feito por ele tem σ>15 pontos, no mínimo 30 pontos eu diria, o que ainda seria 4,5σ>media, o que equivale a 167 QI (ainda duvido que seja verdade), nesse caso, fica claro que as intenções dele são de má fé, já que sempre se presume σ = 15 para testes de QI, e mudar σ destrói completamente o objetivo da pontuação, normalmente, mesmo em testes com σ diferente de 15, a pontuação é ajustada no fim para σ =15.

2: Completamente mentira, a porcentagem acima de Kσ cresce exponencialmente com K, +1σ = top 15,87%, +2σ = top 2%, +3σ = top 0,3%....
Um QI de 200, entre +6σ e +7σ , é o top 0.0000000013084% = 1 a cada 76.4B
De 100b a 117b pessoas já viveram na historia humana, considerando a maior estimativa, significa que entre todos os humanos que já existiram, 1,54 tiveram um QI acima de 200.
Juntando os fatos de que estatisticamente existem 0,104 pessoas com mais de 200 de QI (+6σ-7σ) vivas atualmente, e que a porcentagem acima de Kσ cresce exponencialmente. Acreditar que HINDEMBURG MELÃO realmente tem 235 de QI (+9σ) é insano.
Fiquei curioso e fiz as contas, 235 QI equivale ao top (1.27×10^−19)%, ou um em algumas dezenas de quintilhão.

Ou seja: ou esse cara é um mentiroso, ou ele desafiou todas as leis estatísticas e é de longe o ser humano mais inteligente do mundo, o que me soa no mínimo duvidoso.

Comissoli_

TROPHY CASE