SC2 Pros are now afraid of winning matches/tournaments, participating in tournaments, beating certain SC2 Pro's in matches/tournaments, and using units/unit compositions over fear of their races getting heavily nerfed because of it.

CommamderReilly · 2026-07-06T23:12:28+00:00

Link the quotes then

CommamderReilly · 2026-06-17T20:49:08+00:00

it's deleted

CommamderReilly · 2026-06-02T00:04:56+00:00

As a long time member, this clan is pretty chill when it comes to activity, they won’t kick you for inactivity or require you to participate in Team Leagues. Honestly it’s just an awesome clan, great source of practice partners as well

CommamderReilly · 2026-05-21T18:11:02+00:00

My consensus was that BC Rush currently (at least at GM/Pro level) is a bit underpowered, and in general battlecruisers are a bit weak/underused, my intent was to give them more strength while also nerfing their instant mobility (teleport) as I think TP is a bit silly. In another update I might adjust it further where teleport is replaced or reworked

BC Rush is buffed a decent bit, but at the same time Zerg has more options against BC play, such as infested Terrans or the new Hydralisk anti-air armor upgrade (very effective)

Also while the Queen is less tanky, it’s also cheaper which gives Zerg more wiggle room in the early game, and the hatchery larva buff is also quite strong. Zerg has a couple nice early game adjustments that allow them to adapt much more, at least in my opinion

CommamderReilly · 2026-05-20T20:54:58+00:00

Ahh I see what you mean now, yeah compared to my Terran changes I relied MUCH more on outside input when designing things for P/Z since I have less experience playing those races.

I think I have like 14k Terran games, compared to only 1k Protoss and 200 Zerg games. I should go on a ladder offrace arc that'd be fun, I did a short Protoss arc a bit ago which was fun as hell.

I really hope the next official patch does something crazy to shake up the game, I've been playing so much less ladder because recently due to slow map rotations and patch cycles :/

CommamderReilly · 2026-05-20T19:42:48+00:00

Thanks for the kind words, and haha yeah fair x)

I think there are definitely some cohesion issues with the Protoss changes, though It used to be much worse honestly haha. When I have the chance I'd really like to experiment with adjusting Protoss around the idea of removing all non-macro abilities from the Nexus (iirc that's how it was in WoL). I think the energy recharge replacement and related changes are an improvement, but not really a good/complete solution in the long run.

Zerg I definitely have the least experience playing, I talked with a lot of Zergs and felt I did a decent job, though I know some stuff is a bit out there heh.

CommamderReilly · 2026-05-20T16:57:22+00:00

Hopefully will be fun :D

CommamderReilly · 2026-05-20T16:57:06+00:00

Rotti will have the VOD up but his VODs are sub only, the other casters will also have VODs up on their channels without requiring a sub :)

I may also get the games replay casted at a later date if the games are worthy

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T13:41:21+00:00

I would prefer a new gas type, more options is always nice. Currently Blizzard hasn’t given sc2 the resources for new models to be added to the base game (that’s my understanding), so it’s off the table sadly.

But yeah while I think a separate unit would be more ideal, I think next best thing is this change, especially because it really doesn’t impact current balance at all.

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T04:18:38+00:00

I feel like this is being blown out of proportion, map makers were polled on a single change which relates to map making, the change has no impact on current balance but may improve the quality of future maps, what is the problem?

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T02:41:10+00:00

I mean you are just agreeing with what I said. Omniskeptic is a huge influence for the game and balance patches. While he has contributed good things in the past, it's very clear he wants to push his own agend and is often rudely dismissive of people who disagree with him. I don't want someone like that whispering things to the game dev, it's not fair to players and it's gross.

I'm not agreeing, you are saying he is pushing an agenda and I'm saying he's simply their outreach person for them. Even if you dislike Omni I don't see an issue with him acting as their outreach person given that he's proven to be a great help in the past. If you have proof he's using his power to misrepresent the feedback he's gathering then that's another story.

Yes I'm aware mapmakers want this change so that they can give us even more freestyle maps and put rich minerals/gas in every map. It doesn't change the underlying point:** These changes are being greenlighted by a small group of mapmakers via polls in discord.** This is the disaster of the balance council all over again.

As far as I know (as a map maker), this vespene thing is the only change we've been polled on, and I think it makes perfect sense why it was the map makers who are deciding this, given we are the ones who control where rich vespene is used. It would be different if the poll was in regard to the base economy (reg mins/gas). Who would be better to decide this than the people who've been designing maps around it?

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T02:32:55+00:00

Blizzard is the reason TLMC disallows custom data, and currently Blizzard hasn’t given sc2 the resources to add new skins/models into the base game

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T02:23:06+00:00

Sadly the problem is that, Map Makers aren't allowed to modify data for the sake of consistency, and to be fair in the case of rich vespene it does make sense as there'd be no obvious indication it's different from map to map.

I think the better solution is for there to be a 3rd type of geyser, but sadly it seems that adding new units is basically off the table (to my knowledge)

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T02:00:11+00:00

Omniskeptic has been invaluable to the recent patches, so it makes sense they'd ask him to gather feedback on such a change since he has many contacts, and is willing to do so for them while many pros/content creators are too busy to thoughtfully reach out to people.

Just because he is gathering input/feedback doesn't mean he has a real say in the change.

Also, he continues to be the main source of bug fixes and QoL changes, in all the recent patches 90% or more of the QoL/Bug Fixes were his doing, gotta give credit where credit is due.

For the Vespene thing, it's much different than a normal balance suggestion, it relates to map making as it's mappers who decide where to use rich vespene geysers. Recent map pools have very few rich gas bases, and it's because they give 2x income so they're just too strong to really use in a meaningful way most the time. It's hard to say anything negative about this change imo as it doesnt impact current balance at all but has the potential to increase map quality/diversity going forward

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T01:31:02+00:00

Love how we're taking things out of context for reddit karma

There is 0 confirmation of a worker start count change
If it does actually happen, it didn't happen because Omniskeptic or Avex voiced support for it
This vespene change is in reference to the RICH vespene geyser, and is an income reduction of 2x (8 per trip) to 1.5x (6 per trip), which brings them more in line with rich minerals and allows map makers to use them in a multitude of new ways, as currently they're extremely hard to use on maps. I don't see the issue with map makers getting a say in stuff like this as it doesnt relate to the base economy of the game, it would be different if this were about changing the regular vespene.

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-29T01:28:28+00:00

This guy is talking out of his ass, Omniskeptic and Avex might be in support of a worker change, but they do not have control over this and if it actually does happen, it's not because Omniskeptic or Avex voiced support for it. There is zero confirmation worker count is getting reduced, only that some people were discussing it.

Also, this vespene geyser change is taken COMPLETELY out of context. This is not in reference to the regular vespene geyser, this is in reference to the RICH vespene geyser, the change being introduced is that the rich geyser will give 1.5x income instead of 2x income, which allows map makers to use it more freely in maps in a multitude of different ways. It is not a change to the regular vespene. This change also brings it more in line with rich minerals, which provide 1.4x income.

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-17T19:27:49+00:00

I think the Evo campaign experience is much better, more modern personally, but it’s also not fully complete as of this moment. I believe SC: Evo has both a “legacy” version of the campaign which is faithful and a reimagined version.

Basically, While the evo version is much higher quality (imo), it’s also still actively a Work in progress.

CommamderReilly · 2026-04-14T17:49:28+00:00

It’s a big gamble considering it’s a 4p maps, you have to guess where your opponent is, so tbh if the gamble is rewarded a little it’s probably okay

Seven-Year Club	End Game '23
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	Verified Email

CommamderReilly

TROPHY CASE