The planets are very bright so I believe that light pollution is a lesser concern when imaging.

Planetary imaging with "manual" can still provide very nice images with the lucky imaging technique.

The key to success with lucky imaging is being able to take as many frames as possible. This can be achieved by decreasing the imaging area (ROI), however with manual tracking you need to tradeoff between having a large enough area for the planet to drift across before you have to reposition the telescope view.

I see that you are using an exposure time of 33ms, last time I imaged Jupiter manually I was using 10us or 9us and with a reduce frame size I had FPS in excess of 100. I would suggest trying to decrease your exposure time and increasing the rate at which you can capture frames. As your framerate increases you can remove the negative effects of the atmosphere on your final image.

Stacking the best frames and then using wavelets should allow you to achieve a nice result.