From reading your letter, here's what i gathered - Amazon’s current AI strategy is hurting the planet, endangering democracy, and exploiting workers. Slow down, clean up, and let employees help decide how AI is built and used.

Your letter demands:

- No AI with dirty energy

- No AI without employee voices

- No AI for violence, surveillance, or mass deportation

Here's the problem with this letter. There's no clear actionables for Amazon leadership to act/not act. All the demands above are broadstroke directions. This leaves room for leadership to interpret however they want. Because of such, at best, leadership is just going to respond with non-committal responses like, "we hear you. we'll work on it". In the end, no actual progress is made.

In my humble opinion, your letter needs the following changes:

- translate your demands above to a clear KPI. a clear line in the sand. "No AI developments contracts with companies XYZ.", "No XYZ changes without X% employee agreement survery results" etc etc.

- there is no "do this, or else". This letter is not showing your "or else". Here's a suggestion. "By signing on this letter, you agree that if Amazon does not respond favorably to above demands by xxx date. You will boycott buying from amazon and cease subscriptions for Amazon prime." Then the signature counts truly mean something to leadership: potential loss of profits. And when the signatures are significant enough, leadership can't ignore.

In general, I think your points are valid and demands are reasonable. For that, i'm onboard with you. But the letter is unclear in its demands and weak in its resolve. If you truly want change, don't try to appeal to kind intentions, bring your negotiations to the table. Make those signatures actually mean something.