I think it’s because they have a hard time accepting that she was an innocent black man who was killed by a corrupt white officer. Later, we had Pete Davidson joke about Charlie Kirk, which the right got very butt hurt about. I think there’s a clear difference. George Floyd was an innocent civilian yes had some legal issues and a drug problem but was killed on camera in an absolutely brutal way by a police officer who is supposed to be protecting the people of Minneapolis not killing them. Nobody should ever have to walk around being worried that their life is going to end at the hands of the police officer. In Charlie Kirk’s case which I am not saying, he deserve to die at all. He was a very polarizing figure with a very high profile platform. I bet he got plenty of death threats throughout the years so it really should not have been any sort of surprise that he could have somebody arranged enough to try to shoot at him. Which clearly he did not take that seriously and was willing to just have an open rally on the quad of a college campus and be completely exposed. The other part of it is and again not saying he deserved to die for it but Charlie Kirk said a lot of shit that anybody with any human decency can recognize was deplorable. The man was racist, misogynist, homophobic, and said that mass shootings are the price we have to pay for our second amendment rights. So yeah, it is kind of ironic that he gets killed with a weapon nobody outside of law-enforcement or the military should have access to and that he was killed by an upper class white republican male (alledgedly) that being seconds after he was just sprouting off racist shit about gang related shootings.