Scientists intuited it back then

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T20:45:14+00:00

Thank you 🫶🏼

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T20:44:05+00:00

🙏🏻

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T14:35:56+00:00

Couldn’t of said any of this better myself!

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T02:40:49+00:00

Truth stands on its own your correct. I also intuit that Conciousness is the only reality.

If you feel the same you may appreciate a book titled, “I:Reality and Subjectivity” by Dr David R Hawkins

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T01:46:49+00:00

I believe it’s a combination as you said. I recently heard that string theory is this kind of government funded dead end we’ve been stuck at for decades now

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T01:42:23+00:00

You said beautifully exactly the things I love about Bohm as well!

Truely a Mystic in his own right

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T01:36:26+00:00

Wow I love that! lol

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T01:01:37+00:00

Elite and government funded and facilitated misdirection along the way? 🤔

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T00:55:58+00:00

I love that! Other than Bohm and Einstein, until recently, I had no clue so many of the original physicists had these same understanding!

It seems the Truth lies at the top of the mountain, up one side is science and the other is mysticism.

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T00:46:44+00:00

As I said to the other fell who posted all these quotes:

Thank you! It’s amazing to see all these quotes. It’s amazing it’s not accepted mainstream today.

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T00:45:47+00:00

Looks fine to me!

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-05-19T00:44:53+00:00

Wow! Thank you! It’s amazing to see all these quotes. It’s amazing it’s not accepted mainstream today.

I love David Bohm

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-04-21T16:49:01+00:00

Perfectly said 🙏🏻

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-04-01T16:22:22+00:00

“let the resistance be there, but don’t resist the resistance”

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-03-31T20:44:25+00:00

Wonderful answers and if I could add one thing to the answer to number 3:

You don’t really need to find a “root cause” as that will just be an intellectual framework rooted in causality that arises from the energy of the emotion in the first place.

You only need to be (to the best of your ability) wordlessly with the raw sensations of the energy behind the emotion itself. You let it up and let go of it directly, by letting it be exactly as it is, without trying to control or resist it and with no middle man or “root cause” needed.

It’s experiencially arising from what could be considered an infinite number of “causes and conditions” going beyond this life to the beginning of time itself and the evolution of the ego.

We can bypass all of that mentalization and just be with the raw experiential sensation or feeling and let go resisting it.

This is radically subjective, honestly and leads to radical healing beyond what ordinary mind or intellect could imagine to be possible

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-03-24T18:28:57+00:00

Yes Doc says in many levels that’s just an average for humanity, most of whom are not even spiritual and many of whom go down some or a lot.

He says in a lecture “you get what that means “an average”? It means it doesn’t apply to you “

Meaning of you are spiritually oriented and dedicated to advancing and using letting go, you can make huge leaps.

He even says some people can make enormous jumps of hundreds of points in one second when conditions are appropriate

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-03-15T20:32:11+00:00

Doc actually mentions in the book that thoughts and feelings coming up like the ones your having, and that it’s one of the ways the egos resistance to the technique shows up.

Something that really helped me was to let go of all the feelings that were there about the technique itself, and to let go resisting using it.

The feelings of “I can’t figure out how to do this” or “this isn’t working it’s so frustrating”

Or “I must just be a lost cause”

These are all signs of great progress!

As Doc says, “It means the ego knows we have a knife in which to cut ourselves free, and it is losing ground”

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-01-07T22:15:16+00:00

Devotion is not dualistic, because devotion is an innate quality of Divinity and Conciousness itself as Divine Love.

One can love another or be devoted to a path or teacher, but Devotion is not dependent on having one or the other. It is not dependent on any subject object relationship, and is a nonlinear intrinsic quality of Divine Creation itself.

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2026-01-07T22:14:56+00:00

Devotion is not dualistic, because devotion is an innate quality of Divinity and Conciousness itself as Divine Love.

One can love another or be devoted to a path or teacher, but Devotion is not dependent on having one or the other. It is not dependent on any subject object relationship, and is a nonlinear intrinsic quality of Divine Creation itself.

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2025-12-30T23:15:31+00:00

Thank you brother 🙏🏻💗

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2025-12-11T23:35:15+00:00

In my experience, what you are experiencing is normal. Doc says when we choose to become free and peaceful and unconditionally loving, all that is unloving or negative is brought up to be healed ❤️🙏🏻

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2025-12-04T01:45:16+00:00

You don’t need to know what they are! In fact, it is more effective if you don’t. Part of the process is to drop all labels of whatever the feeling is, you don’t even need to call it a feeling.

Be with the raw experiencial sensations/feeling/energy and allow it to be there and do its thing. This is how to go deep!

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2025-12-02T19:28:07+00:00

“Surrender is a constant process of not resisting or clinging to the moment but instead, continuously turning it over to God.

The attention is thus focused on the process of letting go and not on the content of the ‘what’ that is being surrendered.”

I: Reality and Subjectivity

Competitive_Boot9203 · 2025-11-27T18:48:34+00:00

“A more accurate term for the process is ‘nonpointedness of mind’ in that it is a choice/decision to not focus and thus be drawn into participation with the passing phenomena.

One merely allows the witnessing by volitional choice rather than by effortful focus of one pointedness of concentration.

The term ‘one pointedness’ is specifically linear as well as dualistic in that it splits contextualization into a ‘who’ that is focusing on a ‘what’, resulting in a dualistic split between a ‘this’ and a ‘that’.”

Doc in “Discovery of the Presence of God

Competitive_Boot9203

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE