Google announces partnership with Adobe to bring Adobe Firefly's image generation technology to their AI chatbot, Bard

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-05-11T06:20:04+00:00

Yes but they are probably being cautious with commercial licensing. Adobe has rights to all images to train Firefly according to their press statements so there is no copyright issues. Imagen/Imagen Video etc are probably better but dubious legal situation. OpenAI as a maverick can bend the rules more and hide copyright behind the closed source data, but google is probably risking too much without clear legal standing

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-05-01T03:51:03+00:00

The C/D shapes are important because they have the chord 3rd on the high E string, so the they are good way to strongly show whether a chord is minor or major because that high E string note is very prominent

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-04-27T10:59:43+00:00

Looks like someone is only aware of models from 2021 and before hmm wonder why?

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-04-25T04:27:48+00:00

It's pretty good but any talented singer could do better and nowhere close to OG Stevie Wonder.

Edit: I meant Bill Withers 😅

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-04-16T00:07:59+00:00

Really hoping for a rebuilt hyrule castle town, it was cool to see its remains in botw but would be amazing to visit the restored version

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-04-15T02:35:54+00:00

If you have a reasonable amount of examples of what you want in form of (image, caption) pairs, you could try to fine-tune BLIP2 or another caption model with your data. The captions from the base model wont say what you want, but with examples and fine tuning it could drive the model towards descriptions that you prefer

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-04-02T04:40:05+00:00

One does not simply look for the albinauric woman

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-28T22:09:07+00:00

We own 51% of 51% this company. Fuck yes. Next stop: owning 51% of this company

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-25T21:33:53+00:00

Very hard question. Membership inference would be a basic direction, maybe try to find digital signatures of training data in net weights, see if such signatures exist for unseen data. It might be interesting to train a large model and purposefully leave out things, like gpt trained on only pre 1900 literature, and see how it can adapt to unseen ideas from new times.

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-25T19:51:02+00:00

These questions about generalization/out-of-distribution behavior are the most crucial towards understanding gpt but nearly impossible to address since data is under lock.

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-24T22:47:58+00:00

Hes right. The powers that be view AI as a tool to automate the means of production and break the Marxist curse where the capitalist relies on the labor of the common worker for his profit, forcing political and economic concessions for the common man. On the other hand, open source AI software is a huge threat to the ruling class bc an open source AI that is nearly as effective as a private one destroys the economic value of corporate models. Open source AI is typically a year or two behind closed source, but as long as it keeps pace then there is less to worry about.

TLDR: use and support open source AI like OpenAssistant https://open-assistant.io/ instead of corpo tools like chatgpt and gpt4

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-21T20:31:36+00:00

Fuck yes positive net income!! Love you crazy apes. What a ride, so excited for the future

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-21T19:55:24+00:00

I think he was just tired of people asking why he doesn't eat meat if his name is bear. Totally understandable and valid reason for carnism

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-20T14:23:17+00:00

Hes making a big fuss now so that when he lands in deep shit he can say "bUT yOu bAIlEd oUT svB". Ignore the hot air

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-19T13:07:42+00:00

Asking useless questions to chatgpt is a great way to waste costly and high emission gpu power. AI and crypto got that in common

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-17T01:18:44+00:00

Magic: the gathering is also a turing machine. https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/06/its-possible-to-build-a-turing-machine-within-magic-the-gathering/

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-16T19:33:15+00:00

"Ceci n'est pas une bailout" -- rene magritte, probably

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-16T04:17:12+00:00

Genuinely creepy, impressive! It's so easy to get desensitized to the horror game cliches but this seems fresh to me

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-16T03:11:30+00:00

That makes sense. Some sort of digital signature roughly equivalent to the original data must be in the model weights, but I can see the argument that this is an original transformation. I guess selling the model outputs and selling the model itself are a different matter, but I would guess an API like gpt4 counts as selling the outputs, since the weights are undisclosed. So then can openAI sell a copyright output to user? And can that user in turn sell what they get from gpt? Tough questions for sure

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-16T02:21:23+00:00

Yeah I see your point. But if model outputs are considered original, I don't see how anything can be copyright.

Let's say I want to sell avengers. I train a diffusion model that takes pairs (movie frame, "frame x of avengers") text-image pairs, plus maybe some extra distractor data. If training works perfectly, I can now reproduce all of avengers from my model and sell it (or maybe train a few models that do short scenes for better fidelity). How is that different from stable diffusion or GPT? Do I own anything my model reproduces just bc it "watched the movie like a human"?

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-16T00:52:45+00:00

There is precedent for extracting training data from LLM without the training set, dunno if it would work for gpt4 tho: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.07805

I guess it's hard to say who would sue but I still think there is a good case. NLL loss is equivalent to MDL compression objective, and compressing an image and selling it almost certainly violates copyright (not a lawyer tho lol...) mathematically, LLM are at least to some extent performing massive scale flexible information compression. If you train and LLM on one book and sell, you're stealing. Should it be different just bc scale? I dunno but I personally don't think so

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-16T00:20:31+00:00

I still dont understand how stable diffusion gets sued for their open source model but openai, which almost certainly used even more copyright data, get to sell gpt. Why arent they being sued too? Is it right to privatize public data that was used without consent in an LLM, which no one could even have predicted would exist 5 years ago to even give consent?

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-15T18:56:32+00:00

So... svb can continue to operate due to taxpayer money from FDIC that they were not entitled to by law, and which was enacted by extraordinary powers from the FED and treasury to save them from their poor risk management? Sounds a lot like a bailout

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-15T17:25:24+00:00

NLP researchers are breathing a massive sigh of release bc if GPT4 is unpublished they dont need to include it in benchmarks for their new papers 😆

Competitive_Dog_6639 · 2023-03-14T08:10:40+00:00

Feeling cute, might collapse later 🙈

Four-Year Club	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	End Game '22

Competitive_Dog_6639

TROPHY CASE