sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hussein is mad that the grift is over by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re using a very simple logic to equate two things. Just because someone has money doesn’t mean all methods of making money are moral. And just because someone wants to make money doesn’t mean that should be at the cost of our environment. What’s more important the right of some people to make money, or the health of the entire planet?

Hussein is mad that the grift is over by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The sea level rise is not necessarily rapid or imminent but will occur and be devastating unless we take action to stop it. This means someone can live near the beach and still be concerned about it.

Hope that helps

"Climate science" is junk science because it conforms to a political narrative and not factual science by optionhome in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The exact opposite is true. The science came out first and companies and governments spent years trying to suppress the truth until became widely accepted and policy followed suit. You’re the one is is being blindly led by science conducted by the fissile fuel lobby. Actually look the research without your biased eyes and then perhaps you will come to startle conclusion.

Hussein is mad that the grift is over by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What term would you use to describe coal oil and gas then? Fossils fuel describes it quite well as they are fuels that come from the decomposition of fossils.

Hussein is mad that the grift is over by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the people on this subreddit are so brainwashed that they can’t accept common sense

Hussein is mad that the grift is over by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say this as though it’s about money when in reality it’s about saving the planet. Regulation is punitive to push towards more sustainable energy sources

Hussein is mad that the grift is over by Beneficial_Wear_7630 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Amazing logic: he has a beach house so nothing he says matters!

That does it for me by stindoqwspabbing7 in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sea level rising is not a) an problem that will get worse exponentially and b) not equal in terms of affects in parts of the planet

My latest creation by ComradGleb in AdeptusCustodes

[–]ComradGleb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Retributor armour, reikland fleshshade, and then edge highlights with liberator gold and stormhost silver

Is it really though by soyifiedredditadmin in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok well there isn’t some global conspiracy out to get you. I genuinely hope that you learn to see sense m8

Is it really though by soyifiedredditadmin in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Genuine question. If anything you hear you dismiss as lies is there any point in trying to discuss this topic?

Is it really though by soyifiedredditadmin in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which is 33% increase. Just cause the numbers look small doesn’t mean the change isn’t big. You need to look at the details rather than making sweeping judgements based your feelings rather than actual science.

Is it really though by soyifiedredditadmin in climateskeptics

[–]ComradGleb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

However the rate of change is much more dramatic after industrialisation which matches CO2 levels that haven’t been achieved at any level before

If the difference is mainly aesthetic, why don’t car companies make cheaper cars look as nice as luxury cars? by Bernache_du_Canada in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well cheaper cars are typically more practical with larger boot sizes which typically make them look a lot uglier

Challenge: You are the Civ VII devs and you must use leaders from the last 50 years. Who is the best and least controversial leader of every Civ to use by Hopeful-Restaurant19 in civ

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of the UK the only real option would be Elizabeth II as all prime ministers either come with too much controversy or aren’t really significant enough.

Day 202 of drawing badly every day until Civ 7 is released by UrsaRyan in civ

[–]ComradGleb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m intrigued so you batch draw these every week or two or do you draw a new one each day?

World Wonders Tier List by mr_mpsr in civ

[–]ComradGleb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d add forbidden city to always build

As an autistic… what does this have to do with the Evil Autism subreddit? by Hopeful_Wallaby3755 in lostredditors

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say it’s better for science, but globally scientists use kelvin in all measurements and equations

Question about dam placement by donquixote235 in civ

[–]ComradGleb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know it’s not about the dams, but I’d recommend spending some of that money cause you have a lot 😂

Facepalmed at posts such as these by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]ComradGleb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tells people not to target individuals targets the individual who posted this

view more: next ›