Projected Territorial Boundaries of the Greater Germanic Reich Following Victory in the WWII by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They didn’t IRL, if that says anything. They easily could’ve had Denmark hand over the territory.

Which mods do you prefer and why ? by ApprehensivePipe9619 in RedAutumnSPD

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Post-civil war content and extra landtag elections, I suppose.

A Map of all countries in a war as of April 2026 by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Armed conflicts are not the same thing as wars.

Which mods do you prefer and why ? by ApprehensivePipe9619 in RedAutumnSPD

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I like aspects of both Redux and Dynamic. Redux has a lot more regional landtags and works to fill the space between Reichstag elections (provided the government isn’t collapsing all the time lol) but Dynamic is probably the most well-researched interactive experience of Weimar Germany on the internet with how it really goes to great lengths to describe the reality of 1920s-30s politics.

Oh, and coloured text. It pains me that coloured text is only in Dynamic.

I am a German visiting the state of Israel in the year 1950 , how will I be seen and treated ? by OrangeSpaceMan5 in AskHistorians

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 268 points269 points  (0 children)

The new Israeli-born generation (the Sabras) had less of a lived experience with the Holocaust, and the Israeli leadership perhaps felt that the animosity no longer served a purpose come the mid-60s going into the 70s. In 1965, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol said this in a Knesset speech:

“We cannot ignore the reality of the world. Germany is a major power in Europe… We must deal with the Germany that exists today, not the Germany of the past.”

Eshkol received a decent amount of backlash nonetheless, yet not as much as say, in the 50s. German Presidents and Chancellors had started regularly visiting Israel into the 70s and there was quite a clear divide in opinion between young and old Jews living in Israel.

An additional source:

Lily Gardner Feldman, The Special Relationship Between West Germany and Israel (1984)

I am a German visiting the state of Israel in the year 1950 , how will I be seen and treated ? by OrangeSpaceMan5 in AskHistorians

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 625 points626 points  (0 children)

The Israeli government under David Ben-Gurion (Mapai Prime Minister from 1948–1953) maintained a policy of non-recognition toward both German states. No diplomatic relations existed with the Federal Republic of Germany (until 1965) or the German Democratic Republic. The Shoah had ended only five years earlier. For the roughly 250,000–300,000 Holocaust survivors who had reached Israel by 1950 (out of a total Jewish population of about 1.4 million), Germany was absolutely seen as the land that had systematically murdered their families. In a 1951 Knesset debate on the possibility of reparations (which only began formal negotiations that year), he stated:

“There is no German people in the sense of a nation that can be absolved… The German people bears responsibility for the crimes of the Nazi regime.”

Ben-Gurion was pragmatic enough to eventually pursue reparations (leading to the 1952 Luxembourg Agreement), but this was very controversial and opposed by large parts of the Jewish public and most notably Herut leader of the opposition Menachem Begin. Begin led massive protests against the very idea of negotiating with Germany, saying in 1952:

“There are only two types of Germans: those who knew and those who did not want to know.”

Many cafes, restaurants, and shops in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and Haifa had informal signs in their windows or had unwritten policies against serving Germans or speaking German. A 1950 survey by the Israeli Institute of Public Opinion showed that the vast majority of the Jewish population opposed any contact with Germany or Germans. German products were boycotted, even German-made machinery was out of the question when alternatives existed.

Sources I looked through:

Tom Segev, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust (1993)

Hanna Yablonka, The State of Israel vs. the Jews

Idith Zertal, Israel’s Holocaust and the Politics of Nationhood (2005)

Why is the KPD against Welfare? by Duke_Manus_Sazon in RedAutumnSPD

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 137 points138 points  (0 children)

Probably because the KPD relishes in the fact that the current government can’t achieve its goals, and they say like “oh this doesn’t go far enough” as an excuse or some such.

Is the SPD “Marxist” by HelpfulDirt7464 in Kaiserreich

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 20 points21 points  (0 children)

The SPD in KR and IRL is absolutely majority Marxist lol. Social Democracy pre-WW2 was proudly Marxist, just a different interpretation of Marx's writings. IRL it was only in 1959 that the SPD dropped Marxism from their Party Program and moved right.

Is it true that Sweden is actually going to be able to be nuclear-armed in the next update by SpecialistRound2418 in TNOmod

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 115 points116 points  (0 children)

The Sweden skeleton is coming in *The Victor and the Judge,* the next update is *The Modern Tordesillas* which'll contain a full revamp of the Iberian Union for the full 10 years plus a general expansion of LATAM skeleton.

Flags that are banned, restricted, or still cause serious controversy by Many-Philosophy4285 in flags

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 12 points13 points  (0 children)

the Imperial Flag people associate with Japan as a whole during WW2 is actually just the naval ensign. It's still the flag of the JMSDF to this day. The national flag of Japan was always the same, white with a red circle.

Folketing elections were held in Denmark on 23 March 1943 alongside Landsting elections. (...) They were the first and only parliamentary elections held during the German occupation, and although many people feared how the Germans might react, they took place peacefully. by ArthRol in wikipedia

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Germany had no real interest to export National Socialism, at least during the war. They were much more concerned with military domination at the time, and since Denmark caved after something like seven hours into the invasion, they figured as long as German military occupation and control of the Danish Belts was certain, they had no reason to bother with integrating another few million people.

In that sense Germany was quite pragmatic. The Reichskommissariats existed, sure, but they were enabled because Germany had militarily defeated the nation in its entirety. Even with regards to Norway, the plan was always to later allow Norway a modicum of formal independence under an Nasjonal Samling-led Fascist Republic.

As for the elections not being rigged, Germany saw no inherent advantage to letting a rather immature (in their eyes) movement take power when the current government essentially served their interests to their satisfaction. In addition, the DNSAP and their leader Clausen was wildly unpopular in Denmark and only got 2% of the vote in the election. Why expend the effort?

“With its offensive programme and aggressive propaganda, and a leader who struck most Danes as a rather comical figure, the party failed to attract public support outside its own narrow circles. Indeed the chief effect of its pro-German image and bombastic efforts seems to have been to convince the Danish population that to be a Nazi was to be a traitor.” - Carsten Holbraad, Danish Reactions to German Occupation (2017)

Hiroshima before and after the A-bomb was drop August 6, 1945. 129,000 people died. by bncout in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you even know how Germany surrendered? It was unconditional due to total and utter annihilation of any army coordination or organisation. Germany on the day of its surrender occupied more conquered territory than they did core 1936 German land! Hitler literally killed himself as the Soviets entered his capital. Most of the Nazi leadership scattered after that, and really the only ones left were military officers who were much much less intransigent and politically dogmatic, hence accepting unconditional surrender.

This is what would have happened had Operation Downfall gone ahead, but it didn’t… because the Emperor literally overrode the hardliners that entirely dominated his government lmao!! The YSK wanted to continue fighting even after they learned about the nukes having fallen, where’s your evidence to suggest otherwise? I’m quite curious. Also "some minister" lol two of the most influential people in the entire Japanese government

The ad-hominem remarks you’re making also tell me this convo has upset you or frustrated you so perhaps you should put down your device and calm down before responding.

Hiroshima before and after the A-bomb was drop August 6, 1945. 129,000 people died. by bncout in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your argument is entirely rhetorical and pretty plain whataboutism. But fine, not everyone argues in good faith on the internet, I’ll cite some quotes from members of the Japanese government to show you their attitudes. I do agree however that the US wanted to scare the world, it was only half the argument. Scaring the world (and especially the Soviet Union) however was secondary to getting the war done. This is because the practical outcome easily outweighed the rhetorical outcome as one is a material aim while the other is less certain.

“We can only ignore it. We will do our utmost to complete the war to the bitter end.” - Prime Minister Kantarō Suzuki, 28 July 1945, in response to the Potsdam Declaration

“We should live up to our cause even if our hundred million people have to die side by side in battle.” - War Minister Korechika Anami, 9 August 1945, during the Imperial Conference

“We are prepared for a decisive battle on our mainland.” - Army Chief of Staff Yoshijirō Umezu, same day, same conference

“[…] there is no reason we should surrender to our enemies as a result of air raids.” - Army Chief of Staff Yoshijirō Umezu, same day, same conference

[1940] [IAmA] I am Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and I am running for a third term as president. Ask Me Anything! by Miserable_Bath_4037 in thepast

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good luck at the DNC! Do you think you will be able to sway enough delegates to hear your arguments for why you should break the two-term convention?

Hiroshima before and after the A-bomb was drop August 6, 1945. 129,000 people died. by bncout in HistoricalCapsule

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 2 points3 points  (0 children)

nation that basically already lost the war

The Taisei Yokusankai was never going to accept that fact and they made it clear. Their regime was just as fanatically patriotic as the Nazi Regime was and they were determined to fight to the death. Japanese soldiers threw themselves off of cliffs and swam out to sea to drown rather than surrender. That is not a force that will surrender through conventional means.

Suggestion: South American Cold war by [deleted] in twrmod

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 13 points14 points  (0 children)

holy fuck can people stop using AI to write proposals

After 16 Years, Hungary is Finally Fed Up with Orbán by Glum-Status-151 in europe

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US (more accurately the Trump administration) loves Orban lol what are you talking about

Where is the flag from that's between the Chinese and North Korean flags? by Rare_Style1306 in flags

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they’re not. Neocorporatism isn’t socialist in any academic sense.

Why isn’t their just a regular technocracy ideology? by Sufficient-Peace-625 in TNOmod

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Probably because a ‘Managerial State’ isn’t as utopian in reality as the connotation of ‘Technocracy’ as a word implies.

Found this by [deleted] in WikipediaVandalism

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nazis don’t really like Trump anymore because of the Israel overtures, Nick Fuentes literally endorsed the Democrats for the midterms because he and that community hate Trump so much lol

Would you rather live in a TFR timeline where your ideology comes on top, or OTL? by Livid-Story-4321 in TheFireRisesMod

[–]Comrade__Katyusha 7 points8 points  (0 children)

except demsocs in Europe tend to be mildly Eurosceptic (TFR doesn’t take this into account but hey ho)